Skip to main content

Switzerland: Citizens’ Initiatives as a Measure to Control the Political Agenda

  • Chapter
Book cover Citizens’ Initiatives in Europe

Part of the book series: series ((CDC))

Abstract

Switzerland formed as a modern state out of 25 cantons and half-cantons in 1848, with universal (male) suffrage. The new state was initially designed as a representative system. Although the first constitution had a clause that constitutional amendments have to be the subject of a popular vote, the so-called compulsory referendums, and it was possible to ask for a total revision of the constitution through collecting signatures, it was never the intention of the constitution makers that there would be regular and frequent amendments to the constitution. The mandatory referendum was mainly a concession towards the Catholic minority to make sure that constitutional amendments could not easily be pushed through by the national legislatures (Rappard, 1912). After the adoption of the first constitution in 1848, it took 18 years until the first amendments to the constitution became unavoidable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • von Beyme, K. (1982) Parteien in westlichen Demokratien (München: Piper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, S. and T. Donovan (2006) ‘Direct Democracy and Political Parties in America’, Party Politics, 12(5), 649–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I. (2001) ‘Political Parties in Direct Democracy’ in M. Mendelsohn and A. Parkin (eds) Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites, and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns (Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bützer, M. (2007) Direkte Demokratie in Schweizer Städten: Ursprung, Ausgestaltung und Gebrauch im Vergleich (Baden-Baden: Nomos).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freitag, M., A. Vatter and C. Müller (2003) ‘Bremse oder Gaspedal? Eine empirische Untersuchung zur Wirkung direkter Demokratie auf den Steuerstaat’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 44(3), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, E. R. and S. Hug (2001) ‘Legislative Response to Direct Legislation’ in M. Mendelson and A. Parkin (eds) Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites, and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 88–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, T. (2002) A Government by the People: Direct Democracy in America, 1890–1940 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruner, E. (1977) Die Parteien der Schweiz (Bern: Francke).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hug, S. (2004) ‘Occurrence and Policy Consequences of Referendums’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 16(3), 321–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immergut, E. M. (1992) Health Politics. Interests and Institutions in Western Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, B. et al. (2004) Guidebook to Direct Democracy in Switzerland and Beyond (Bern: Initiative and Referendum Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchgässner, G. et al. (1999) Die direkte Demokratie: Modern, erfolgreich, entwicklungs- und exportfähig (Basel/Genf/München: Helbing & Lichtenhahn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobach, K.W. (1993) The Referendum. Direct Democracy in Switzerland (Dartmouth: Aldershot).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kölz, A. (1992) Neuere Schweizerische Verfassungsgeschichte. Ihre Grundlinien vom Ende der Alten Eidgenossenschaft bis 1848 (Bern: Stämpfli).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kölz, A. (2004) Neuere schweizerische Verfassungsgeschichte. Ihre Grundlinien in Bund und Kantonen (Bern: Stämpfli).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H. (2005) Direct Democratic Choice: The Swiss Experience (Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto and Oxford: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H. and D. Wisler (1995) ‘Social Movements and Direct Democracy in Switzerland’, European Journal of Political Research, 30(1), 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladner, A. and M. Brändle (1999) ‘Does Direct Democracy Matter for Political Parties?’, Party Politics, 5(3), 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladner, A. and M. Bühlmann (2007) Demokratie in den Gemeinden. Der Einfluss der Gemeindegrösse und anderer Faktoren auf die Qualität der Demokratie in den Gemeinden (Zürich/Chur: Rüegger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1984) Democracies. Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, W. (2005) Schweizerische Demokratie. Institutionen, Prozesse, Perspektiven (Bern: Haupt).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, G. (2006) ‘The Interaction between Direct and Representative Democracy in Switzerland’, Representation, 42(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, G. and D. Strohmann (1998) Wahl- und Abstimmungsrecht in den Kantonen (Bern: Haupt).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neidhart, L. (1970) Plebiszit und pluralitäre Demokratie. Eine Analyse der Funktionen des schweizerischen Gesetzesreferendums (Bern: Francke).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neidhart, L. (1986) ‘Funktions- und Organisationsprobleme der schweizerischen Parteien’, Schweizerisches Jahrbuch für politische Wissenschaft, 26, 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Y. (1991) ‘Quel rôle pour les petits partis dans la démocratie dirécte?’, Annuaire suisse de science politique, 31, 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Y. (1998) Démocratie directe (Paris: Economica).

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Y. (2001) ‘How does Direct Democracy Matter? The Impact of Referendum Votes on Politics and Policy-Making’, West European Politics, 24(2), 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. F. (1967) The Concept of Representation (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappard, W. E. (1912) ‘The Initiative, Referendum and Recall in Switzerland’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 43, 110–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, J. (2010) Mit Machtverzicht zum Einheitsstaat. Eine politökonomische Analyse zum institutionellen Wandel in der Schweiz (Zürich/Chur: Rüegger-Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T. (2002) A Government by the People: Direct Democracy in America, 1890–1940 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trechsel, A. (2000) Feuerwerk Volksrechte: die Volksabstimmungen in den schweizerischen Kantonen 1970–1996 (Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trechsel, A. and U. Serdült (1999) Kaleidoskop Volksrechte: Die Institutionen der direkten Demokratie in den schweizerischen Kantonen (1970–1996) (Basel/Genf/München: Helbing & Lichtenhahn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatter, A. (2002) Kantonale Demokratien im Vergleich. Entstehungsgründe, Interaktionen und Wirkungen politischer Institutionen in den Schweizer Kantonen (Opladen: Leske, Budrich).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Georg Lutz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lutz, G. (2012). Switzerland: Citizens’ Initiatives as a Measure to Control the Political Agenda. In: Setälä, M., Schiller, T. (eds) Citizens’ Initiatives in Europe. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230369900_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics