Advertisement

Linking Up Levels of Governance: Agencies of the European Union and their Interaction with International Institutions

  • Martijn Groenleer
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

The creation of semi-autonomous European Union (EU) agencies is arguably one of the most prominent institutional innovations at EU level in recent history. Since the early 1990s in particular, the EU and its member states have delegated a wide range of tasks to a quickly growing number of agencies. EU agencies have now become pervasive features of an emerging European executive order (Busuioc, Groenleer and Trondal, 2012; Groenleer 2009).

Keywords

European Union Member State International Institution United Nations Environment Programme European Food Safety Authority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D. (1998), ‘Why States Act through Formal International Organizations’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, H. E. (1976), ‘Resource Dependence and Interorganizational Relations’, Administration and Society, 7, 419–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich, H. and Whetten, D. A. (1981), ‘Organisation Sets, Action Sets, and Networks. Making the Most of Simplicity’, in P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck (eds) Handbook of Organizational Design (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, M. N. and Coleman, L. (2005), ‘Designing Police: Interpol and the Study of Change in International Organizations’, International Studies Quarterly, 49(4), 593–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, M. N. and Finnemore, M. (2004), Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  6. Börzel, T. A. (1998), ‘Organizing Babylon — on the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks’, Public Administration, 76(2), 253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Busuioc, M. (2010), The Accountability of European Agencies: Legal Provisions and Ongoing Practices (Delft: Eburon).Google Scholar
  8. Busuioc, M., Groenleer, M. and Trondal, J. (eds) (2012), The Agency Phenomenon in the European Union: Emergence, Institutionalisation and Every-Day Decision Making (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  9. Carpenter, D. P. (2001), Forging Bureaucratic Autonomy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  10. Chiti, E. (2004), ‘Decentralisation and Integration into the Community Administrations: A New Perspective on European Agencies’, European Law Journal, 10(4), 402–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiti, E. (2009), ‘An Important Part of the EU’s Institutional Machinery: Features, Problems and Perspectives of European Agencies’, Common Market Law Review, 46(5), 1395–442.Google Scholar
  12. Curtin, D. and Egeberg, M. (2008), ‘Tradition and Innovation: Europe’s Accumulated Executive Order’, West European Politics, 31(4), 639–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dai, X. (2005), ‘Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism’, International Organization, 59(2), 363–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dehousse, R. (1997), ‘Regulation by Networks in the European Community: The Role of European Agencies’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 246–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1983), ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Downs, A. (1967), Inside Bureaucracy (Boston: Little, Brown and Co.).Google Scholar
  17. Eberlein, B. and Grande, E. (2005), ‘Beyond Delegation: Transnational Regulatory Regimes and the EU Regulatory State’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12(1), 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eberlein, B. and Newman, A. L. (2008), ‘Escaping the International Governance Dilemma? Incorporated Transgovernmental Networks in the European Union’, Governance, 21(1), 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Egeberg, M. (eds) (2006), Multilevel Administration: The Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  20. Everson, M., Majone, G., Metcalfe, L. and Schout, A. (1999), ‘The Role of Specialised Agencies in Decentralising EU Governance’, Report Presented to the Commission, available at http://ec.europa.eu/governance/areas/group6/contribution_en.pdf, date accessed 26 April 2011.
  21. Flinders, M. (2006), ‘Public/Private: The Boundaries of the State’, in C. Hay, M. Lister and D. Marsh (eds) The State: Theories and Issues (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  22. Geradin, D. and Petit, N. (2004), ‘The Development of Agencies at EU and National Levels: Conceptual Analysis and Proposals for Reform’, Jean Monnet Working Paper, No. 01/04 (New York: New York University School of Law).Google Scholar
  23. Groenleer, M. (2009), The Autonomy of European Union Agencies: A Comparative Study of Institutional Development (Delft: Eburon).Google Scholar
  24. Groenleer, M., Kaeding, M. and Versluis, E. (2010), ‘Regulatory Governance through EU Agencies? The Implementation of Transport Directives’, Journal of European Public Policy, 17(8), 1212–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hofmann, H. C. H. and Türk, A. (eds) (2006), EU Administrative Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  26. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2001), Multi-Level Governance and European Integration (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield).Google Scholar
  27. Jönsson, C. (1986), ‘Interorganization Theory and International Organizations’, International Studies Quarterly, 30(1), 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jordan, A. and Schout, A. (2006), The Coordination of the European Union: Exploring the Capacities of Networked Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kassim, H. (1994), ‘Policy Networks, Networks and European Union Policy Making: A Skeptical View’, West European Politics, 17(4), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelemen, R. D. (2002), ‘The Politics of Eurocratic Structure and the New European Agencies’, West European Politics, 25(4), 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelemen, R. D. and Tarrant, A. (2011), ‘The Political Foundations of the Eurocracy’, West European Politics, 34(5), 922–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keohane, R. O. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  33. Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. (2000), Power and Interdependence. World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little, Brown and Company).Google Scholar
  34. Krause, G. A. (1999), A Two-Way Street: The Institutional Dynamics of the Modern Administrative State (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).Google Scholar
  35. Lewis, J. (2005), ‘The Janus Face of Brussels: Socialization and Everyday Decision Making in the European Union’, International Organization, 59(4), 837–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Majone, G. (1997), ‘The New European Agencies: Regulation by Information’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 262–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayntz, R. (1993), ‘Modernization and the Logic of Interorganizational Networks’, Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 6(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meier, K. J. and Bohte, J. (2006), Politics and the Bureaucracy: Policymaking in the Fourth Branch of Government (Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing).Google Scholar
  39. Metcalfe, L. (1994), ‘International Policy Co-Ordination and Public Management Reform’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 60(2), 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Metcalfe, L. (2000), ‘Linking Levels of Government: European Integration and Globalization’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(1), 119–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1977), ‘Institutionalizing Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Milward, A. S. (1992), The European Rescue of the Nation-State (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  43. Moravcsik, A. (1998), The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  44. Niskanen, W. A. (1971), Bureaucracy and Representative Government (Chicago: Aldine-Atherton).Google Scholar
  45. Oliver, C. (1990), ‘Network Relations and Loss of Organizational Autonomy’, Human Relations, 44(9), 943–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oliver, C. (1991), ‘Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions’, Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241–65.Google Scholar
  47. Olsen, J. P. (2003), ‘Towards a European Administrative Space?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 10(4), 506–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ott, A. (2008), ‘EU Regulatory Agencies in EU External Relations: Trapped in a Legal Minefield between European and International Law’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 13(4), 515–40.Google Scholar
  49. Peters, B. G. (1992), ‘Bureaucratic Politics and the Institutions of the European Community’, in A. Sbragia (ed.) Euro-Politics (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution).Google Scholar
  50. Peterson, J. (1995), ‘Decision-Making in the European Union: Towards a Framework for Analysis’, Journal of European Public Policy, 2(1), 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978), The External Control of Organizations (New York: Harper and Row).Google Scholar
  52. Pollack, M. (1997), ‘Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community’, International Organization, 51(1), 99–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Provan, K. G. and Milward, H. B. (1995), ‘A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Provan, K. G. and Milward, H. B. (2001), ‘Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks’, Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Radaelli, C. (2002), ‘The Domestic Impact of European Union Public Policy: Notes on Concepts, Methods, and the Challenge of Empirical Research’, Politique Europeenne, 5(1), 105–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Randall, E. (2006), ‘Not That Soft or Informal: A Response to Eberlein and Grande’s Account of Regulatory Governance in the EU with Special Reference to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13(3), 402–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996), ‘The New Governance: Governing without Government’, Political Studies, 44(4), 652–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rijken, C. (2001), ‘Legal and Technical Aspects of Co-operation between Europol, Third States and Interpol’, in V. Kronenberger (eds) The European Union and the International Legal Order: Discord or Harmony? (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press).Google Scholar
  59. Schout, A. (2008), ‘Agencies and Inspection Powers — the Case of EASA as New or More of the Same?’, in E. Vos (ed.) European Risk Governance: Its Science, Its Inclusiveness and Its Effectiveness (Connex Book Series) (Mannheim: Mannheim University Press).Google Scholar
  60. Slaughter, A.-M. (2004), A New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  61. Stone Sweet, A., Sandholtz, W. and Fligstein, N. (2001), The Institutionalization of Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thelen, K. (1999), ‘Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thompson, J. D. (1967), Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
  64. Vos, E. (2003), ‘Agencies and the European Union’, in L. Verhey and T. Zwart (eds) Agencies in European and Comparative Law (Maastricht: Intersentia).Google Scholar
  65. Wilson, J. Q. (1989), Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  66. Wincott, D. (1995), ‘Institutional Interaction and European Integration: Towards an Everyday Critique of Liberal Intergovernmentalism’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 33(4), 597–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yataganas, X. A. (2001), ‘Delegation of Regulatory Authority in the European Union: The Relevance of the American Model of Independent Agencies’, Jean Monnet Working Papers, No. 03/01 (Cambridge: Harvard Law School).Google Scholar
  68. Zito, A. R. (2001), ‘Epistemic Communities, Collective Entrepreneurship and European Integration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), 585–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martijn Groenleer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martijn Groenleer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations