Abstract
During the last two decades, the European Union (EU) has not only developed an ever more comprehensive acquis in many policy areas, but has also engaged in extending these rules to non-EU members through ‘governance below the membership line’ (Friis and Murphy, 1999) or ‘external governance’ (Lavenex, 2004). In the realm of environmental policy, for instance, the EU has been promoting its rules, including those of environmental governance, in its neighbourhood for many years. In its efforts, the EU has not relied on bilateral approaches only but has also made use of multilateral fora in order to transmit its environmental acquis. One of these is the so called ‘Environment for Europe’ (EfE) process that emerged from a Czechoslovakian initiative in 1991. The achievement of greater policy co-ordination was among the major objectives of this process from the beginning. However, it was clear that policy co-ordination meant ‘one-way harmonization’ towards EU rules (Caddy, 1997).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (2006), Report of the Meeting. Addendum. Findings and Recommendations with Regard to Compliance by Belgium with its Obligations under the Aarhus Convention in Relation to the Rights of Environmental Organizations to have Access to Justice (Communication ACCC/C/2005/11 by Bond Beter Leefmilieu Vlaanderen VZW (Belgium)), ECE/MP.PP/C.1/2006/4/Add.2 (28 July).
Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (2011), Findings and Recommendations of the Compliance Committee with Regard to Communication ACCC/C/2008/32 (Part I) Concerning Compliance by the European Union (14 April).
Bugdahn, S. (2008), Travelling to Brussels via Aarhus: Can Transnational NGO Networks Impact on EU Policy?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 588–606.
Bulmer, S. J. (1998), ‘New Institutionalism and the Governance of the Single European Market’, Journal of European Public Policy, 5(3), 365–86.
Caddy, J. (1997), ‘Harmonization and Asymmetry: Environmental Policy Co-ordination between the European Union and Central Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4(3), 318–36.
Christiansen, T., Falkner, G. and Jørgensen, K. E. (2002), ‘Theorizing EU Treaty Reform: Beyond Diplomacy and Bargaining’, Journal of European Public Policy, 9(1), 12–32.
ClientEarth (2008), Communication to the Aarhus Convention’s Compliance Committee (Communication ACCC/C/2008/30).
Commission (1993), ‘Towards Sustainability. A European Community Programme of Policy and Action in Relation to the Environment and Sustainable Development (Fifth Environmental Action Programme)’, Official Journal of the European Communities, C138, 17 May 1993, 5–98.
Commission (1996), Implementing Community Environmental Law COM(96) 500 final, 22 October.
Commission (1998), Proposal for a Council Decision on the Signature by the European Community of the UN/ECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters COM(1998) 344 final. 2 June.
Commission (2002), Second Working Document. Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, 22 July, available at http://www.elaw.org/node/2680, date accessed 26 April 2011.
Commission (2003), Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Access to Justice in Environmental Matters COM(2003) 624 final, 24 October.
Commission (2009), ‘Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. Conference on “The Aarhus Convention: How are its Access to Justice Provisions being Implemented?”, 2 June 2008’. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Council (1997), Council Resolution of 7 October 1997 on the Drafting, Implementation and Enforcement of Community Environmental Law, Official Journal, C 321, 22 October 1997, 1–5.
Council (2004), Preparation of the Meeting of the Council (Environment) on 20 December 2004. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Application of the Provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to EC Institutions and Bodies = Political Agreement, 15153/04, 29 November.
Council (2005), Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Access to Justice in Environmental Matters — State of Play, 9967/05, 10 June.
Council (2006), Adoption of the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Application of the Provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to EC Institutions and Bodies — Statement, 10407/06 ADD 1 REV 1, 29 June.
Council (2009), International Conference on Practical Implementation of the Aarhus Convention (Brno, 16–17 April 2009) — Information from the Presidency, 11073/09, 16 June.
Cremona, M. (2006), ‘External Relations of the EU and the Member States: Competence, Mixed Agreements, International Responsibility, and Effects of International Law’, EUI Working Paper LAW No. 2006/22 (Firenze: European University Insitute).
Crossen, T. and Niessen, V. (2007), ‘NGO Standing in the European Court of Justice — Does the Aarhus Regulation Open the Door?’, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law (RECIEL), 16(3), 332–40.
Delreux, T. (2008), ‘The EU as a Negotiator in Multilateral Chemicals Negotiations: Multiple Principals, Different Agents’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15(7), 1069–86.
Delreux, T. (2009a), ‘The EU in Environmental Negotiations in UNECE: An Analysis of its Role in the Aarhus Convention and the SEA Protocol Negotiations’, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law (RECIEL), 18(3), 328–37.
Delreux, T. (2009b), ‘The EU Negotiates Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Explaining the Agent’s Discretion’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 719–37.
Dross, M. (2004), ‘Die Access-Studie: Konsequenzen für den Richtlinienvorschlag zu Klagerechten in Umweltangelegenheiten’, Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht (3/2004), 152–6.
Dross, M. (2005), ‘Access to Justice in EU Member States’, Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 2(1), 22–30.
Ebbesson, J. (2002a), ‘Comparative Introduction’, in J. Ebbesson (ed.) Access to Justice in Environmental Matters in the EU (The Hague: Kluwer Law International).
Ebbesson, J. (2002b), ‘European Community’, in J. Ebbesson (ed.) Access to Justice in Environmental Matters in the EU (The Hague: Kluwer Law International).
ECO (1996a), Brussels Declaration from the Pan-European ECOs Conference on Public Participation, 28 October.
ECO (1996b), ECO Report from the Second Negotiating Session, 30 October-1 November.
ECO (1996c), ECO Report on the First Meeting of the Ad hoc Working Group on the ECE Convention on Access to Environmental Information and Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making, 17–19 June.
ECO (1997a), ECO Report from the Fourth Negotiating Session, 17–21 February.
ECO (1997b), ECO Report from the Sixth Negotiating Session and Preparatory Meetings, 7–11 July 1997.
O. Elgström (2000), ‘Norm Negotiations. The Construction of New Norms Regarding Gender and Development in EU Foreign Aid Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 7(3), 457–76.
Environment for Europe (1991), Conclusions of the Conference ‘Environment for Europe’, Dobris Castle, Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, 21–3 June.
Environment for Europe (1993), Declaration, Lucerne, 30 April.
Environment for Europe (1995), Declaration by the Ministers of Environment of the Region of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Sofia, 25 October.
Epiney, A. (2003), ‘Zu den Anforderungen der Aarhus-Konvention an das europäische Gemeinschaftsrecht’, Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht, (Sonderheft 2003), 176–84.
European Economic and Social Committee (2004), Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, COM(2003) 624 final — 2003/0246 (COD) NAT/223, 29 April.
European Parliament (2004), ‘European Parliament Legislative Resolution on the Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, P5_TA-PROV(2004)0239, 31 March’, Official Journal of the European Union, C 103 E 29 April 2004, 626.
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2006), ‘Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the Application of the Provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community Institutions and Bodies’, Official Journal of the European Union, L 264, 25 September 2006, 13–19.
Franck, T. M. (1990), The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Friis, L. and Murphy, A. (1999), ‘The European Union and Central and Eastern Europe: Governance and Boundaries’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(2), 211–32.
Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. R. (1996), ‘Political Science and The Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies, 44, 936–57.
Hontelez, J. (2009), Letter to the Environment Ministers of Member States Concerning Input to the EU Environment Council meeting 25 June 2009 European Environmental Bureau, 27 May.
Jendrośka, J. (2005), ‘Aarhus Convention and Community Law: The Interplay’, Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 2(1), 12–21.
Krämer, L. (2006), ‘Umsetzung und Vollzug des Umweltrechts’, in T. Ormond, M. Führ and B. Regine (eds) Environmental Law and Policy at the Turn of the 21st Century (Berlin: Lexxion).
Lambert, L. and Bélier, S. (2011), Access to Environmental Justice — Aarhus Convention. Question for Written Answer to the Commission E-002454/2011.
Lavenex, S. (2004), ‘EU External Governance in “Wider Europe”’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 680–700.
Martin, L. L. (2008), ‘Book Review: Xinyuan Dai, International Institutions and National Policies’, The Review of International Organizations, 3(2), 201–6.
Pallemaerts, M. (2009), Compliance by the European Community with Its Obligations on Access to Justice as a Party to the Aarhus Convention, IEEP Report (Institute for European Environmental Policy).
Pernice, I. and Rodenhoff, V. (2004), ‘Die Gemeinschaftskompetenz für eine Richtlinie über den Zugang zu Gerichten in Umweltangelegenheiten’, Zeitschrift fïir Umweltrecht, (3/2004), 149–51.
Pierson, P. (1996), ‘The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis’, Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 123–63.
Pierson, P. (2004), Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Radaelli, C. M. (2002), ‘The Domestic Impact of European Union Public Policy: Notes on Concepts, Methods, and The Challenge of Empirical Research’, Politique européenne, (2002/01, No. 5), 105–36.
Raustiala, K. (1997), ‘States, NGOs, and International Environmental Institutions’, International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 719–40.
Risse, T. (2004), ‘Global Governance and Communicative Action’, Government and Opposition, 39(2), 288–313.
Rittberger, B. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2006), ‘Explaining the Constitutionalization of the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13(8), 1148–1167.
Schimmelfennig, F. (2001), ‘The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union’, International Organization, 55(1), 47–80.
Schimmelfennig, F. and Thomas, D. C. (2009), ‘Normative Institutionalism and EU Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective’, International Politics, 46(4), 491–504.
Slocock, B. (1999), ‘“Whatever Happened to the Environment?”: Environmental Issues in the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union’, in K. Henderson (ed.) Back to Europe. Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union (London: UCL Press).
Stec, S. and Casey-Lefkowitz, S. (2000), The Aarhus Convention: An Implementation Guide (New York, Geneva: United Nations).
Thelen, K. (1999), ‘Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404.
Thelen, K., and Steinmo, S. (1992), ‘Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics’ in S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (eds) Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Thomas, D. C. (2009), ‘Explaining the Negotiation of EU Foreign Policy: Normative Institutionalism and Alternative Approaches’, International Politics, 46(4), 339–57.
UNECE (1997), Report of the Eighth Session CEP/AC.3/16, 17 December.
United Nations (1992), Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, A/CONF.151/26 (vol. I).
Wates, J. (1996a), Access to Environmental Information and Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making. UN ECE Guidelines: from Theory to Practice (Brussels: European Environmental Bureau).
Wates, J. (1996b), ‘Towards an ECE Convention on Access to Information and Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making’, Elni Review (1/1996), 15–21.
Wates, J. (1997a), ‘The Convention Negotiations’, Participate, (2), 5–8.
Wates, J. (1997b), Germany’s Stance in the Public Participation Convention Negotiations (Brussels: European Environmental Bureau, 1 May).
Wates, J. (2005), ‘NGOs and the Aarhus Convention’, in T. Treves, M. Frigessi di Rattalma, A. Tanzi, A. Fodella, C. Pitea and C. Ragni (eds), Civil Society, International Courts and Compliance Bodies (The Hague: TMC Asser Press).
Ziehm, C. (2005), ‘Legal Standing for NGOs in Environmental Matters under the Aarhus Convention and under Community and National Law’, Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 2(4), 287–300.
Zschiesche, M. (2002), ‘The Aarhus Convention — More Citizens’ Participation by Setting out Environmental Standards?’, Elni Review (1), 21–9.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Anne Wetzel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wetzel, A. (2012). The Influence of International Institutions on Access to Justice in Environmental Matters in the EU and its Member States. In: Costa, O., Jørgensen, K.E. (eds) The Influence of International Institutions on the EU. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230369894_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230369894_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33973-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-36989-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)