Advertisement

When Multilateralism Hits Brussels: Generalizations and an Agenda for Further Research

  • Knud Erik Jørgensen
  • Oriol Costa
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

The contributions to this volume suggest that the influence of international institutions on the EU can be significant. It has been demonstrated that international institutions shape EU policies, sometimes strongly. Similarly, they can act as a source of preferences and strategies for EU stances in international fora. International institutions can also influence policy-making processes by triggering the emergence of new actors and coalitions or differentially empowering some of them. The reinforcement of the Commission or the facilitation of agreements among member states can even foster small-scale processes of EU integration. Importantly, sometimes these effects are unintended or even undesired by the states that created the international institution in the first place, which shows that top-down processes are at least occasionally independent from previous bottom-up ones. In other words, the studies in this volume suggest that international institutions constitute the EU, and not only the other way around.

Keywords

Member State World Trade Organization International Institution Policy Entrepreneur Aarhus Convention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Costa, O. (2008), ‘Is Climate Change Changing the EU? The Second Image Reversed in Climate Politics’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21(4), 527–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Costa, O. (2010), ‘The Unexpected EU Leadership on Landmines. The Influence of the Ottawa Convention on the EU’, European Security, 18(3), 245–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Costa, O. and Meier, E. H. (2011), ‘Is the Downloading of the New Global IPR Regime Changing the EU? The Second Image Reversed of Intellectual Property Rights’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  4. Dai, X. (2005), ‘Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism’, International Organization, 59(2), 363–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Foot, R., MacFarlane, S. N. and Mastanduno, M. (eds) (2003), US Hegemony and International Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  6. Jönsson, C. Bjurulf, B., Elgström, O., Sannerstedt, A. and Strömvik, M. (1998), ‘Negotiations in Networks in the European Union’, International Negotiation, 3(3), 319–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Karns, M. P. and Mingst, K. A. (1990), The United States and Multilateral Institutions (London: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kohler-Koch, B. (2002), ‘European Networks and Ideas: Changing National Policies?’, European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 6(6), available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2005–002a.htm, date accessed 26 April 2011.
  9. Peterson, J. (1995), ‘Decision-making in the European Union: Towards a Framework for Analysis’, Journal of European Public Policy, 2(1), 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Risse, T. Ropp, S. C. and Sikkink, K. (1999), The Power of Human Rights. International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ruggie, J. G. (ed.) (1993), Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Schimmelfennig, F. (2001), ‘The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union’, International Organization, 55(1), 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schreurs, M. and Tiberghien, Y. (2007), ‘Multi-level Reinforcement: Explaining European Union Leadership in Climate Change Mitigation’, Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Slaughter, A. M. (2004), A New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  15. Underdal, A. (2004), ‘Methodological Challenges in the Study of Regime Effectiveness’, in O. R. Young and A. Underdal (eds) Regime Consequences. Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies (Dordrecht: Kluwer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Knud Erik Jørgensen and Oriol Costa 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Knud Erik Jørgensen
  • Oriol Costa

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations