Abstract
Our beliefs often fail to meet even very minimal epistemic conditions: they fail to be true, or they fail to be justified. Even where some belief is both true and justified, the believer may hold it for the wrong reasons; That is, the reasons he adduces may not be those which in fact justify the belief. The project of identifying and evaluating our reasons for — and sources of — belief is central to contemporary philosophy, but its present-day form first found expression in Plato’s early ‘Socratic’ dialogues. These dialogues aim less at positive conclusions than at negative critique, many of them ending with an aporia, leaving their central question unresolved. They typically pose definitional problems — What is beauty? What is piety? What is virtue?, but seldom yield conclusive answers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Ausland, H. W. (1997) ‘On Reading Plato Mimetically’, The American Journal of Philology, 118, 371–416.
Butcher, S. H. (trans.) (1898) The Poetics of Aristotle, 2nd rev. edn (London: Macmillan).
Dorter, K. (1973) ‘The Ion: Plato’s Characterization of Art’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 32, 65–78.
Fowler, H. N. (trans.) (1913) Plato, with an English Translation; Vol. 1: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus (London: William Heinemann).
Ha’Ezrahi, P. (1964) On The Perfect Being (Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Press).
Halhwell, S. (1992) Plato in D. Cooper (ed.) A companion to Aesthetics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Janaway, C. (1998) ‘Plato: Survey of Thought’ in M. Kelly (ed.) Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, vol. 3 (Oxford: Oxford UP).
Jowett, B (trans.) (1953) The Dialogues of Plato, 4 vols, 4th edn (Oxford: Clarendon).
LaDriere, C. (1951) ‘The Problem of Plato’s Ion’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 10, 26–34.
Lamb, W. R. M. (trans.) and H. N. Fowler (trans.) (1975) Plato, with an English Translation; Vol. 8: The Statesman, Philebus, Ion (London: William Heinemann).
Murdoch, I. (1990) The Fire and the Sun: Why Plato Banished the Artists (New York: Viking Penguin). Excerpts reprinted in this volume.
Nightingale, A. W. (1993) ‘The Folly of Praise: Plato’s Critique of Encomiastic Discourse in the Lysis and Symposium’, Classical Quarterly, 43, 112–30.
Pappas, N. (1989) ‘Plato’s Ion: The Problem of the Author’, Philosophy, 64, 381–9.
Pappas, N. (2008) ‘Plato’s Aesthetics’ in E. N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2008 edn, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fa112008/entries/plato-aesthetics/, accessed on 28 April 2011.
Partee, M. H. (1970) ‘Plato’s Banishment of Poetry’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 29, 209–22.
Ranta, J. (1967) ‘The Drama of Plato’s Ion’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 26, 219–29.
Woodruff, P. (1982) ‘What Could Go wrong With Insprration? Why Plato’s Poets Fail’ in J. Moravcsik and P. Temko (eds) Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield).
Woodruff, P. (1998) ‘Plato: Plato’s Use of Poetry’ in M. Kelly (ed.) Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, vol. 3 (Oxford: Oxford UP).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Dorit Barchana-Lorand
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barchana-Lorand, D. (2012). ‘A Divinity Moving You’: Knowledge and Inspiration in Plato’s Ion. In: Denham, A.E. (eds) Plato on Art and Beauty. Philosophers in Depth. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230368187_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230368187_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33965-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-36818-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)