Skip to main content

The Background as Intentional, Conscious, and Nonconceptual

  • Chapter
Knowing without Thinking

Part of the book series: New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science ((NDPCS))

Abstract

The common understanding of intentionality and consciousness is still so dominated by thought and linguistic representation that even those who see that thought and language require a background of more basic know-how often conceive it as being pre-intentional, non-representational, and non-conscious. In this chapter, I want to argue that the background is non-conceptual rather than non-representational and non-conscious, and that it is conscious and intentional in the sense that background know-how essentially manifests itself in conscious and intentional episodes and performances, in perceptual and actional experiences with non-conceptual intentional content, in experiences of familiarity or surprise, or in the sense of being ready and knowing how to do things.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baillargeon, R. (2004) ‘Infants’ reasoning about hidden objects: evidence for event-general and event-specific expectations’, Developmental Science, 7, 4, 391–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. (2002a) ‘Intelligence without representation — Merleau-Ponty’s critique of mental representation’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 367–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. (2002b) ‘Refocusing the question: Can there be skilful coping without propositional representations or brain representations?’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 413–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1982) The Varieties of Reference (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1963) Das Unbewußte. Schriften zur Psychoanalyse (Frankfurt: S. Fischer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1982) Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith A (1992) Beyond Modularity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R. (1987) Foundations ofCognitive Grammar, Uolume I, Theoretical Prerequisites (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • LePore, E. and R. van Gulick (eds.) (1991) John Searle and his Critics (Cambridge: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangan, B. (2001) ‘Sensation’s ghost: The nonsensory fringe of consciousness’, Psyche, 7 (18). http://www.theassc.org/files/assc/2509.pdf.

  • Pacherie, E. (2011) ‘Nonconceptual representations for action’, Social Psychology, 42, 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proust. J. (2003) ‘Action’ in B. Smith (ed.) 102–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • ,Recanati, F. (2003) ‘The limits of expressibility’ in B. Smith (ed.), 189–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, M. (2007) ‘The microstructure view of the brain/consciousness relation’ in H. Bohse and S. Walter (eds.) Selected Contributions to GAP.6 (Paderborn: Mentis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, M. (2011) ‘Limits of the conscious control of action’, Social Psychology, 42, 93–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1969) Speech Acts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1979) Expression and Meaning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1980) “The background of meaning” in J. Searle, F. Kiefer, and M. Bierwisch (eds.), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics (Dordrecht: Reidel).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1983) Intentionality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1991) ‘Response: The background of intentionality and action’ in E. LePore and R van Gulick (eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1992) The Rediscovery of the Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1995) The Construction of Social Reality (New York: Free Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (2003) (ed.) John Searle (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, G. (1994) Mental Reality (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, R. (1991) ‘The Background of Thought’ in E. LePore and R. van Gulick (eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L (1958) The Blue and Brown Books (Oxford: Blackwell)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1984) Philosophische Untersuchungen (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Michael Schmitz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmitz, M. (2012). The Background as Intentional, Conscious, and Nonconceptual. In: Radman, Z. (eds) Knowing without Thinking. New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230368064_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics