Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The External Effects of CSDP Missions

  • Chapter
The European Union in Global Security

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

  • 291 Accesses

Abstract

CSDP is a tool to help the EU and its member states to respond more rapidly and efficiently to regional and international crises, conflicts, and natural disasters. The rationale behind CSDP operations is to produce beneficial security outcomes for host states and societies, thereby reinforcing European and global security. Thus, Chapter 3 focuses on the external impact of CSDP operations on host states and societies: the government authorities and populations whom CSDP is designed to assist. CSDP is intended to improve security of the host state and society, to an extent that would not be achieved in the absence of a CSDP operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Aoi, C., C. de Coning and R. Thakur (2007) Unintended Consequences of Peacekeeping Operations (Tokyo: United Nations University Press); Carothers, T. (2006) ‘The Problem of Knowledge’ in T. Carothers (ed.) Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge (Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace); Daniel, D., P. Taft and S. Wiharta (2008) Peace Operations: Trends, Progress and Prospects (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press); Durch, W.J. and T.C. Berkman (2006) Who Should Keep the Peace?: Providing Security for Twenty-First-Century Peace Operations (Washington, D.C.: Henry L. Stimson Center); Goldsmith, A. and J. Sheptycki (2007) ‘Concluding Remarks’ in A. Goldsmith and J. Sheptycki (eds) Crafting Transnational Policing: Police Capacity-Building and Global Policing Reform (Portland: Hart Publishing); Holt, V.K. and T.C. Berkman (2006) The Impossible Mandate?: Military Preparedness, the Responsibility to Protect and Modern Peace Operations (Washington, D.C.: The Henry L. Stimson Center); Jones, S.G., J.M. Wilson, A. Rathmell and K.J. Riley (2005) Establishing Law and Order After Conflict (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation); Kirchner, E.J. (2007) ‘Regional and Global Security: Changing Threats and Institutional Responses’ in E.J. Kirchner and J. Sperling (eds) Global Security Governance: Competing perceptions of security in the 21st century (New York: Routledge); Moskos, C.C., J.A. Williams and D.R. Segal (2000) ‘Armed Forces after the Cold War’ in C.C. Moskos, J.A. Williams and D.R. Segal (eds) The Postmodern Military: Armed Forces after the Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press); Oakley, R.B., M.J. Dziedzic and E.M. Goldberg (eds) (2002) Policing the New World Disorder: Peace Operations and Public Security (Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific); Perito, R.M. (2004) Where Is the Lone Ranger When We Need Him?: America’s Search for a Postconflict Stability Force (Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press); Schnabel, A. and H. Ehrhart (2005) Security Sector Reform and Post-conflict Peacebuilding (Tokyo: United Nations University Press); Stromseth, J., D. Wippman and R. Brooks (2006) Can Might Make Rights?: Building the Rule of Law After Military Interventions (New York: Cambridge University Press); and Zaalberg, T.W.B. (2006) Soldiers and Civil Power: Supporting or Substituting Civil Authorities in Modern Peace Operations (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schulze, K.E. (2009) ‘AMM (Aceh, Indonesia)’ in Grevi, G., D. Helly and D. Keohane (eds) European Security and Defence Policy: The First 10 Years (1999–2009) (Condé-sur-Noireau, France: EU Institute for Security Studies), p. 272.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Helly, D. (2009a) ‘Operation ARTEMIS (RD Congo)’ in Grevi, G., D. Helly and D. Keohane (eds) European Security and Defence Policy: The First 10 Years (1999–2009) (Condé-sur-Noireau, France: EU Institute for Security Studies), p. 184.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Helly, D. (2009b). ‘EUFOR Tchad/RCA’ in Grevi, G., D. Helly and D. Keohane (eds) European Security and Defence Policy: The First 10 Years (1999–2009) (Condé-sur-Noireau, France: EU Institute for Security Studies), p. 345.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peral, L. (2009) “EUPOL Afghanistan” in Grevi, G., D. Helly and D. Keohane (eds) European Security and Defence Policy: The First 10 Years (1999–2009) (Condé-sur-Noireau, France: EU Institute for Security Studies), p. 332 and 336.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For an elaboration of this point, see Flessenkemper, T. (2008) ‘EUPOL Proxima in Macedonia, 2003–05’ in M. Merlingen and R. Ostrauskaite (eds) European Security and Defence Policy: An Implementation Perspective (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Major, C. (2009) ‘EUFOR RD Congo’ in Grevi, G., D. Helly and D. Keohane (eds) European Security and Defence Policy: The First 10 Years (1999–2009) (Condé-sur-Noireau, France: EU Institute for Security Studies), pp. 318–319.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Penksa, S.E. (2010) ‘Security Governance, Complex Peace Support Operations and the Blurring of Civil-Military Tasks’ in C. Daase and C. Friesendorf (eds) Rethinking Security Governance: The problem of unintended consequences (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Penksa, S.E. (2009) ‘Lessons Identified from Bosnia and Herzegovina: Strategies for Developing Domestic Reform Agendas’ in Seminar On Police Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Security Sector Reform and the Stabilisation and Association Process (Slovenia: Centre for European Perspective).

    Google Scholar 

  11. United Nations (2004) ‘A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility’ in Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change (United Nations Department of Public Information).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Council of the European Union (2008a) Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy: Providing Security in a Changing World (Council of the European Union S407/08).

    Google Scholar 

  13. For more information on the intersection of gender and security, see Vlachova, M. and L. Biason (eds) (2005) Women in an Insecure World: Violence against Women, Facts, Figures and Analysis (Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces).

    Google Scholar 

  14. United Nations Security Council (2000) ‘United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325’ (United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  15. United Nations Security Council (2008) ‘United Nations Security Council Resolution 1820’ (United Nations); United Nations Security Council (2009) ‘United Nations Security Council Resolution 1888’ (United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  16. United Nations Security Council (2009) ‘United Nations Security Council Resolution 1889’ (United Nations).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bastick, M. and D. de Torres (2010) Implementing the Women, Peace and Security Resolutions in Security Sector Reform (Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Council of the European Union (2008c) ‘Note from the GSC/Commission’ on Comprehensive approach to the EU implementation of the United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820 on women, peace and security (Council of the European Union 15671/1/08), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Council of the European Union (2008d) ‘Note from the Secretariat’ on Implementation of UNSCR 1325 as reinforced by UNSCR 1820 in the context of ESDP (Council of the European Union 15782/3/08).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Daase, C. and C. Friesendorf (2010) ‘Introduction: Security Governance and the Problem of Unintended Consequences’ in C. Daase and C. Friesendorf (eds) Rethinking Security Governance: The problem of unintended consequences (New York: Routledge); See Aoi et al.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Friesendorf, C. and S.E. Penksa (2008) ‘Militarized Law Enforcement in Peace Operations: EUFOR in Bosnia and Herzegovina’, International Peacekeeping, vol. 15, no. 5, 677–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA

    Roy H. Ginsberg (Professor of Government and Jean Monnet Chair in European Integration Studies)

  2. Westmont College, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

    Susan E. Penksa (Professor of Political Science)

Authors
  1. Roy H. Ginsberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan E. Penksa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2012 Roy H. Ginsberg and Susan E. Penksa

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ginsberg, R.H., Penksa, S.E. (2012). The External Effects of CSDP Missions. In: The European Union in Global Security. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367524_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation