Abstract
In Chapter 1, we introduced an EU decision-making model for foreign and security policy. In a crisis, conflict, or natural disaster, EU and national officials respond to the inputs of state and non-state actors. Decision-makers consider contending interests and weigh the costs and benefits of options available to the EU. One possible output of the EU deliberation process is the member state decision to deploy a CSDP operation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
The challenge of peacekeeping in the post-Cold War world is addressed by Durch, W.J. and T.C. Berkman (2006) Who Should Keep the Peace?: Providing Security for Twenty-first-Century Peace Operations (Washington, D.C.: Henry L. Stimson Center); and Jones, S.G., J.M. Wilson, A. Rathmell and K.J. Riley (2005) Establishing Law and Order After Conflict (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation).
For a comparative analysis of the EU and US security strategies, see Penksa, S.E. (2005), ‘Defining the Enemy: EU and US Threat Perceptions After 9/11’ in H. Gartner and I. Cuthbertson (eds) European Security and Transatlantic Relations After 9/11 and the Iraq War (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
Penksa, S.E. (2010) ‘Security governance, complex peace support operations and the blurring of civil-military tasks’ in C. Daase and C. Friesendorf (eds) Rethinking Security Governance: The problem of unintended consequences (New York, NY: Routledge), p. 39.
Penksa, S.E. (2009) ‘Lessons Identified from Bosnia and Herzegovina: Strategies for Developing Domestic Reform Agendas’ in Seminar on Police Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Security Sector Reform and the Stabilisation and Association Process (Slovenia: Centre for European Perspective).
See Penksa (2006) and Friesendorf, C. and S.E. Penksa (2008) ‘Militarized Law Enforcement in Peace Operations: EUFOR in Bosnia and Herzegovina,’ International Peacekeeping, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 677–694.
Ibid.
Permanent Representation of France to the European Union (2008) Guide to the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) (Brussels, Belgium), p. 34.
Ibid.
Drent, M. and D. Zandee (2010) Breaking Pillars: Towards a Civil-Military Security Approach for the European Union (The Hague, The Netherlands: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’), p. 44.
Ibid., p. 47.
Ibid.
For a comparison of EU member state military capabilities in 1999 and 2009, see Grevi, G. and D. Keohane (2009) ‘ESDP Resources’ in Grevi, G., D. Helly and D. Keohane (eds) European Security and Defence Policy: The First 10 Years (1999–2009) (Condé-sur-Noireau, France: EU Institute for Security Studies), p. 81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Roy H. Ginsberg and Susan E. Penksa
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ginsberg, R.H., Penksa, S.E. (2012). The Internal Politics of CSDP Missions. In: The European Union in Global Security. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367524_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367524_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32047-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-36752-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)