Skip to main content

Is Europe Turning into a ‘Technological Fortress’? Innovation and Technology for the Management of EU’s External Borders: Reflections on FRONTEX and EUROSUR

  • Chapter

Abstract

Once upon a time, in an era where the states defined themselves as ‘sovereign’, there was a border point. The border point was a place where a guard or a police-like officer used to ask to check a document called passport, which entitled a person to cross the border. States’ ambitions to enhance controls over the flux of non-citizens entering their territories led them to raise the requirements and ask for an extra document, the visa, a form of permission required before arriving at a state’s port or entry.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Ryan, B., ‘Extraterritorial immigration control: what role for legal guarantees?’ in B. Ryan and V. Mitsilegas (eds), Extraterritorial Immigration Control. Legal Challenges (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff 2010), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Guild, E., Moving the Borders of Europe, inaugural lecture, available at: www.jur.ru.nl/cmr/docs/oratie.eg.pdf; see also K. Groenendijk, E. Guild and P. Minderhoud (eds), In Search of Europe’s Borders (The Hague: Kluwer, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sapelli, G., ‘Disoccupazione, rivolte e immigrazione’, Corriere della Sera, 19 February 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dijstelbloem, H. and A. Meijer, Migration and the New Technological Borders of Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Brouwer, E., Digital Borders and Real Rights: Effective Remedies for Third-Country Nationals in the Schengen Information System (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Guild, E., S. Carrera and F. Geyer, The Commission’s New Border Package. Does It Take Us One Step Closer to a ‘Cyber-Fortress Europe’?, CEPS Policy Brief, No. 154/2008.

    Google Scholar 

  7. These practices emerged in the context of policing external borders in connection with the fight against undocumented migration. See E. Guild and D. Bigo, ‘The transformation of European border controls, in B. Ryan and V. Mitsilegas (eds), Extraterritorial Immigration Control: Legal Challenges (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010), pp. 258–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guiraudon, V., ‘Before the EU Border: Remote Control of the ‘Huddled Masses’’, in K. Groenendijk, E. Guild and P. Minderhoud (eds), In Search of Europe’s Borders (The Hague: Kluwer, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. On surveillance see M. Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Vintage Books, 1995). Playing on the concept of Bentham’s panopticon, see

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Hayes, NeoConOpticon: The EU Security-Industrial Complex. Avaialable at http://www.statewatch.org/analyses/neoconopticon-report.pdf, date of retrieval: 4 April 2011. Transnational Institute and Statewatch, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For a comment on the draft programme, see E. Guild, S. Carrera and A. Faure Atger, ‘Challenges and Prospects for the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, CEPS Working Document No. 313/2009. See also

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. A. Wessel, L. Marin and C. Matera, ‘The external dimension of the EU’s area of freedom, security and justice’, in C. Eckes and Th. Konstadinides (eds), Crime within the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: A European Public Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 272–300.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Curtin, D., Executive Power of the European Union Law, Practices, and the Living Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 146, 147, describes agencies as the ‘satellite executive power’.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. See Baldaccini, A., ‘Extraterritorial border controls in the EU: the tole of FRONTEX in operations at sea’, in B. Ryan and V. Mitsilegas (eds), Extraterritorial Immigration Control. Legal Challenges (Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010), p. 233.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cf Wessel, R. A., L. Marin and C. Matera, ‘The external dimension of the EU’s area of freedom, security and justice’, in C. Eckes and Th. Konstadinides (eds), Crime within the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: A European Public Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 294.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tondini, M., ‘Fishers of men? The interception of migrants in the Mediterranean Sea and their forced return to Libya’, INEX Paper, October 2010, available at: www.inexproject.eu, 16. Accessed on 4 April 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klepp, S., ‘A contested asylum system: The European Union between refugee protection and border control in the Mediterranean Sea’, 12 European Journal of Migration and Law (2010), pp. 1, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Trevisanut, S., ‘The Principle of Non-Refoulement at Sea and the Effectiveness of Asylum Protection’, in A. Von Bogdandy and R. Wolfrum (eds), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, vol. 12. (http://www.brill.nl/max-planck-yearbook-united-nations-law-volume-12–2008 Leiden-Boston-Tokio: Brill, 2008), pp. 205, 245;

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Trevisanut, ‘Maritime border control and the protection of asylum seekers in the European Union’, Touro International Law Review, vol. 12 (2009), pp. 157, 159.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See ex multis, see the complete and accurate reconstruction by V. Moreno Lax, ‘Seeking asylum in the Mediterranean: Against a fragmentary reading of EU Member States’ Obligations Accruing at Sea, International Journal of Refugee Law, vol. 23 (2011), pp. 174–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Besters, F. W. A. Brom, ‘Greedy’ Information Technology: The Digitalization of the European Migration Policy, European Journal of Migration and Law, vol. 12 (2010), pp. 455–70, at 457 ff.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hayes, B., (NGO Statewatch), ‘The robot armies at our borders’, for the Economist’s European Voice, 2 December 2010, available at: http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/imported/the-robot-armies-at-our-borders/69598.aspx. Accessed on 4 April 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Léonard, S., ‘FRONTEX and the Securitization of Migrants through Practices’, paper presented at the Migration Working Group Seminar, European University Institute, Florence, 9 February 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Agamben, G., ‘Al di lâ dei diritti dell’uomo’, Mezzi senza fine, Turin 1996, pp. 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Michiel A. Heldeweg and Evisa Kica

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marin, L. (2011). Is Europe Turning into a ‘Technological Fortress’? Innovation and Technology for the Management of EU’s External Borders: Reflections on FRONTEX and EUROSUR. In: Heldeweg, M.A., Kica, E. (eds) Regulating Technological Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367456_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics