Skip to main content

The ‘Porcupine in the Room’: Socio-Religious Entrepreneurs and Innovators within the Framework of Social Innovation

  • Chapter
Social Innovation

Abstract

In Parerga und Paralipomena (1851), Schopenhauer created a parable about the dilemma faced by porcupines in cold weather. He described a ‘company of porcupines’ who ‘crowded themselves very close together one cold winter’s day so as to profit by one another’s warmth and so save themselves from being frozen to death. But soon they felt one another’s quills, which induced them to separate again, and so on. The porcupines were ‘driven backwards and forwards from one trouble to the other’, until they found ‘a mean distance at which they could most tolerably exist’. Freud, and others, would later pick up on Schopenhauer’s metaphor related to the long-term nature of human relationships, and our desire to both crave and be repelled by intimacy and understanding in human relationships across cultures, settings, and times (see Prochnik, 2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldrich, H. and Zimmer, C. (1985), ‘Entrepreneurship through Social Networks’, in The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship, edited by Raymond Smilor and Donald Sexton, Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B., Boente, W. and Tamvada, Jagannadha P. (2007), Religion and Entrepreneurship. Jena Economic Research Papers in Economics, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Max-Planck-Institute of Economics, pp. 2007–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avis, P. (2009), ‘Review of Religion in Public Life: Must Faith be Privatized?’, by R. Trigg, Ecclesiastical Law Society, 11(3), pp. 352–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., Berger, B. and Kellner, H. (1973), The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness, New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biema, D. Van (2008), ‘The Global Ambition of Rick Warren’, Time Magazine, 18 August 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, D. (2005), So You Want to Change the World? Toronto: Hart House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, Don B.III, Drinkwater, Dawn, Rubach, Michael J. (2007), ‘Spiritual and Religious Entrepreneurs: Studying Christian Entrepreneurs as Opportunity Exploiters and Social Entrepreneurs’, paper presented at the International Conference of the Academy of Entrepreneurship, Jacksonville, Florida, 11–14 April 2007. (Unpublished paper.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2008), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods, Approaches Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. (1998), ‘The Meaning of ‘Social Entrepreneurship’, Report for the Kauffman Centre for Entrepreneurial Leadership, Accessed on 14 November 2011 at: http://www.fuqua.duke.edu/centers/case/documents/dees_SE.pdf.

  • Dodd, S. Drakopoulo and Seaman, P. T. (1998), ‘Religion and Enterprise: An Introductory Explanation’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (1) (Fall 1998), pp. 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drayton, B. (2007), Everyone a Changemaker, Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D., Vos, Ronald J. and Wright, K. P. (2003), Biblical Holism and Agriculture, Pasadena: William Carey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1985), Religion as a Cultural System in Religion and Ideology, Edited by R. Bocock and K. Thompson. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, G. and Zahra, S. A. (2002), ‘Culture and Its Consequences for Entrepreneurship’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26 (4) (Summer 2002), pp. 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golstein, J. A., Hazy, J. K. and Silberstang, J., ed. (2009), ‘Complexity Science & Social Entrepreneurship: Adding Social Value Through Systems Thinking’, 3, Litchfield, AZ: ISCE Publishing, pp. 529–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goossen, R. J. (2004), ‘Entrepreneurship and The Meaning of Life’, The Journal of Biblical Integration in Business, Fall 2004, 11, pp. 21–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (2000), ‘The Economic Sociology of Firms and Entrepreneurs’, Entreprenership: The Social Science View, 11, pp. 244–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenier, P. (2002), ‘The Function of Social Entrepreneurship in the UK’, Draft paper presented at the ISTR Conference, Cape Town, July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, R. (2007), ‘Understanding Social Entrepreneurship’, Industry & Higher Education, 21 (1), pp. 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, D. L., Haskell, J. H. and Kwong, J. W. (2007), ‘Spiritual Resources for Change in Hard Places: A Values-Driven Social Entrepreneurship Theory of Change’, in Complexity Science & Social Entrepreneurship, Vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., Hazy, J. and Higgins, A. (2007), ‘In Europe, God is (Not) Dead’, Wall Street Journal, 14 July 2007, A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberstang, J. (eds) (2009), Complexity Science and Social Entrepreneurship: Adding Social Value through Systems Thinking. A Volume in the Exploring Organizational Complexity Series: Volume 3. Edited by: Jeffrey A. Goldstein, James K. Hazy and Joyce Silberstang. (2009) ISCE Publishing, Litchfield Park, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, M. (2007), ‘Religion and Value-Driven Social Entrepreneurship’, Conference Presentation, 3rd International Social Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark, 18–19 June 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, D. M. (2008), ‘Evangelicalism Rebounds in Academe’, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 9 May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loanzan, J. (2007), ‘Toward Equity: The Poor and University Students’, Political Theology, 8 (3), pp. 341–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, T. (2010), ‘Social Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Link between Concept, Definition and Application in Christian University Business Programs’, Paper Presentation at the Christian Business Faculty Association, Southeastern University, Lakeland, Florida, October 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J. and Marti, I. (2006) ‘Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction and Delight’, IESE Business School, Navarra, Spain. Revised April 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. and Osberg, S. (2007), ‘Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition’, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5, 2 (Spring 2007), pp. 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. and Denton, E. A. (1999), A Spiritual Audit of Corporate America: A Hard Look at Spirituality, Religion, and Values in the Workplace, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohd Jan, N. B. (2009) ‘Theories and Concepts of Entrepreneurship’, Course lecture and presentation for Entrepreneurship 300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (ed.) (2006), Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. and Cho, A. (2006), ‘Social Entrepreneurship: The Structuration of a Field’, in A. Nicholls (ed.) Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osella, C. and Osella, F. (2007), ‘Muslim Entrepreneurs between India and the Gulf’, ISIM Review, 19, Spring 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, P. B. (2003), ‘Belief in Control: Regulation of Religion in China’, The China Quarterly, No. 174, Religion in China Today ( June 2003), pp. 317–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochnik, G. (2011), ‘The Porcupine Illusion’, Accessed 20 November 2010 at http:www.cabinetmagazine.org/isues/26/prochnik.php.

  • Roberts, D. and Woods, C. (2005), ‘Changing the World on a Shoestring: The Concept of Social Entrepreneurship’, University of Auckland Business Review, 7 (1), pp. 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roxburgh, A. and Regele, M. (2000), Crossing the Bridge: Church Leadership in a Time of Change, Chicago: Percept Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, R. (2006), ‘Social Entrepreneurship: A Different Model?’, International Journal of Social Economics, 33 (5/6), pp. 399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J., Alvy, G. and Lees, A. (2000), ‘Social Entrepreneurship – A New Look at the People and the Potential’, Management Decision, 38 (5), pp. 328–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelinsky, W. (2001), ‘The Uniqueness of the American Religious Landscape’, The Geographical Review, 91 (3), pp. 565–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Alex Nicholls Alex Murdock

Copyright information

© 2012 Randy M. Ataide

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ataide, R.M. (2012). The ‘Porcupine in the Room’: Socio-Religious Entrepreneurs and Innovators within the Framework of Social Innovation. In: Nicholls, A., Murdock, A. (eds) Social Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367098_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics