Skip to main content

Contingent Valuation of Digital Identification Card and Electronic Signature Service in Luxembourg

  • Chapter
Internet Econometrics

Part of the book series: Applied Econometrics Association Series ((AEAS))

  • 318 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter refers to the concept of willingness to pay (WTP), defined as what an individual will agree to pay for a benefit (service, equipment, prevention program) funded entirely or in part by the community (Godfroid I., 1996). The concept may be illustrated using a method, the contingent valuation method (CVM) (Mitchell and Carson, 1989). The method relies on a conceptual framework based on the random utility model (RUM) (Haneman, 1984). It is generally limited to the fields of the environment (Loomis et al., 2000) and health (Chanel et al., 2004), and is little used in the field of innovation (Le Gal-Ely, 2003). One objective of the chapter is to show that it is possible to apply CVM in the field of innovation in information and communication technologies (ICT). The innovation this study focuses on is a digital identification card and electronic signature service (www.luxtrust.lu/solutions/choix/choix) and its adoption by individuals aged 16 to 74 years residing in Luxembourg. The service would safeguard electronic exchanges (purchases of books and DVDs, sales, bank transactions or exchanges of information with public services), first, by identifying merchants, suppliers and public services on the Internet and, second, by allowing the individual using the service to electronically sign for all transactions made online.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chanel, O., S. Luchini, A. Paraponaris, C. Protiere and J.-C. Vergnaud (2004) ‘Les consentements à payer pour des programmes de prévention sanitaire incluent-ils de l’altruisme? Enseignements d’une enquête concernant la fièvre Q’, Revue Economique, Vol. 55, No. 5, pp. 923–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droesbeke, J.J., M. Lejeune and G. Saporta (2005) ‘Méthodes statistiques pour données qualitatives’, —in M. Tenenhaus (ed.), Régression logistique, Paris: Technip, p. 276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, A. (2008) ‘Evaluation ex-ante du service offert par le RFId à la bibli-othèque’, La revue de l’innovation: La Revue de l’innovation dans le secteur public, Vol. 14(2), 2009, article 10, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, A. and A.-L. Mention (2007) ‘Quel marché pour la téléphonie mobile NFC à Luxembourg’, MIWIS: Montpellier International Workshop on Information Systems, ‘SI et création de valeur: déterminants, apports et mesures’, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfroid, P., L. Eeckhoudt and M. Marchand (1996) ‘Le consentement à payer’, excerpt from the thesis, ‘Risque de santé, médecine préventive et médecine curative’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, M.W. (1984) ‘Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses’, American Journal of Agricultural Econometrics, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 332–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gall-Ely, M. (2003) ‘Un test de validité de l’analyse conjointe et de l’évaluation contingente dans le cadre de l’évaluation d’un service sans référent de marché’, Laboratoire d’Economie et Sciences Sociales de Rennes (LESSOR), Université de Rennes II — Haute-Bretagne, Séminaire Méthodes quasi-expérimentales de l’IREIMAR, 18 November, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J., P. Kent, L. Strange, K. Fausch and A. Covich (2000) ‘Measuring the Total Economic Value of Restoring Ecosystem Services in an Impaired River Basin: Result from a Contingent Valuation Survey’, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, in Ecological Economics, No. 33, Boston: Boston University, pp. 103–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.C. and R.T. Carson (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington DC: RFF Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus M. (1998) La régression PLS : théorie et pratique, Paris: Technip.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus, M. (ed.) (2005) Régression logistique, Paris: Technip.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terra, S. (2005) ‘Guide de bonnes pratiques pour la mise en oeuvre de la méth-ode d’évaluation contingente’, Direction des études économiques et de l’évaluation environnementale, Série Méthode (http://www.ecologie.gouv.fr), 05-M04, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Alex Durand

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Durand, A. (2012). Contingent Valuation of Digital Identification Card and Electronic Signature Service in Luxembourg. In: Allegrezza, S., Dubrocard, A. (eds) Internet Econometrics. Applied Econometrics Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230364226_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics