Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Evolution of NATO’s Strategy in Afghanistan

  • Chapter
Pursuing Strategy

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges Series ((NSECH))

Abstract

Common wisdom has it that the Atlantic Alliance can hardly succeed in Afghanistan. It has too few troops to man the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), the Afghan government is too ineffi-cient to provide good governance, the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) are too corrupt to take over responsibility once ISAF switches to a supporting role, allies are too tired to continue the war effort. And the list goes on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aybet, G and Moore, R. (2010) NATO in Search of a Vision (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (2009) ‘How Obama Came To Plan For “Surge” in Afghanistan’, New York Times, 6 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. E. and Miller, G. (2009) ‘US Afghan Forces to Grow’, Los Angeles Times, 18 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, R. (2000) ‘Is Strategy an Illusion?’, International Security, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 5–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, S. (2009) ‘Is it Worth it? The Difficult Case for War in Afghanistan’, The American Interest, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canuela, H. (2009) ‘Of Ambiguous Symbolism and Variable Geometry: NATO’s Relevance to National Security in the Twenty first Century’, Journal of Transatlantic Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, R. and Farrell, T. (2011) ‘Campaign Disconnect: Operational Progress and Strategic Obstacles in Afghanistan’, International Affairs, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 271–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chansrasekaran, R. (2011) ‘In Afghanistan’s South, Signs of Progress in Three Districts Signal a Shift’, Washington Post, 16 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, P. (2004) ‘NATO: The Practice and Politics of Transformation’, International Affairs, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, C. (2009) War in Afghanistan: Strategy, Military Operations and Issues for Congress, Congressional Research Service Report to Congress (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, January).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, A. and Wallace, W. (2001) ‘What is NATO for?’, Survival, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 107–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallis, P. and Morelli, V. (2008) NATO in Afghanistan: A Test of the Transatlantic Alliance, Congressional Research Service Report to Congress (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. S. (2006) Strategy and History: Essays on Theory and Practice (Abingdon: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • The House of Commons, Defence Committee (2008) The Future of NATO and European Defence: Ninth Report of Session 2007–08. Report, Together with Formal Minutes, Oral and Written Evidence. Ordered by The House of Commons to be Printed 4 March 2008 (London: The Stationery Office Limited).

    Google Scholar 

  • The International Institute for Strategic Studies, IISS (2011) The Military Balance 2011 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • The International Security Assistance Force, ISAF (2008), ISAF (2008) ‘Campaign Plan Summary (Unclassified)’, http://smallwarsjournal.com/documents/isafcampaignplansummary.pdf, date accessed 16 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, I. D. (2010) ‘The Relevance of Heterogeneous Clubs in Explaining Contemporary NATO Politics’, Journal of Transatlantic Studies, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 337–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (2008) ‘The Rise of Afghanistan’s Insurgency’, International Security, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabul International Conference on Afghanistan (2010) ‘Communiqué, 20 July 2010’, http://www.isaf.nato.int/images/stories/File/official-texts/Communique%20-%20Kabul%20International%20Conference%20on%20Afghanistan%20-%2020%20July%202010.pdf, date accessed 16 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, S. and Khan, S. (2007) ‘NATO and Counter-insurgency: Strategic Liability or Tactical Asset?’, Contemporary Security Policy, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 163–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lellouche, P. (Rapporteur) (2004) ‘Operations in Afghanistan and the Expanding NATO Role’, NATO Parliamentary Assembly, 158 DSC 04 E, http://www.natopa.int/default.asp?SHORTCUT=504, date accessed 18 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, S. (2007) ‘Understanding State-Building and Local Government in Afghanistan’, Working Paper no. 14, LSE Crisis States Research Centre, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. (2011) ‘Cameron Details Afghan Drawdown’, Wall Street Journal, 18 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChrystal, S. (2009), S. (2009) ‘Commander’s Initial Assessment’, 30 August (unclassified), http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/Assessment_Redacted_092109.pdf , date accessed 17 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noetzel, T. and Schreer, B. (2009a) ‘Does a Multi-tier NATO Matter? The Atlantic Alliance and the Process of Strategic Change’, International Affairs, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 211–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noetzel, T. and Schreer, B. (2009b) ‘Missing Links: The Evolution of German Counterinsurgency Thinking’, RUSI Journal, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noetzel, T. and Schreer, B. (2009c) ‘NATO’s Vietnam? Afghanistan and the Future of the Atlantic Alliance’, Contemporary Security Policy, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 529–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NATO (2005) ‘Final Communiqué’, Ministerial Meeting of the North Atlantic Council, Brussels, 8 December, http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2005/p05-158e.htm, date accessed 16 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO (2008) ‘ISAF’s Strategic Vision’, Declaration by the Heads of State and Government of the Nations contributing to the UN-mandated NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan, 3 April, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_8444.htm?mode=pressrelease, date accessed 19 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO (2009) ‘Tactical Directive, 6 July’, http://www.nato.int/isaf/docu/official_texts/Tactical_Directive_090706.pdf, date accessed 18 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO (2010) ‘General Petraeus Issues Updated Tactical Directive’, News Release, 4 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO (2011) ‘International Security Assistance Force (ISAF): Key Facts and Figures’, http://www.isaf.nato.int/images/stories/File/Placemats/16%20May%202011%20Placemat.pdf, date accessed 16 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. (2009) ‘Doctrine and Reality in Afghanistan’, Survival, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 29–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. and Williams, M. (2008) ‘What Lies Beneath: The Future of NATO through the ISAF Prism’, Center for Strategic and International Studies/ Royal United Services Institute, 31 March, http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/080331_nato.pdf, date accessed 18 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, J. and Webber, M. (2009) ‘NATO: From Kabul to Kosovo’, International Affairs, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 491–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, H. (2010) ‘Strategy or Alibi? Obama, McChrystal and the Operational Level of War’, Survival, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 157–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traynor, I. (2010) ‘NATO Maps out Afghanistan Withdrawal by 2014 at Lisbon Summit’, Guardian, 20 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • The United Nations’ Security Council (2001) ‘Resolution 1386, 20 December’, http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N01/708/55/PDF/N0170855. pdf?OpenElement, date accessed 17 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • The United Nations’ Security Council (2003) ‘Resolution 1510, 13 October’, http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N01/708/55/PDF/N0170855. pdf?OpenElement, date accessed 18 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • The United States’ Department of Defense (2009), Statement of Defense Secretary, Robert Gates before the House Armed Services Committee, September 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • The United States’ Department of Defense (2011) Report on Progress Toward Security and Stability in Afghanistan, United States Plan for Sustaining the Afghan National Security Forces, Report to Congress, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • The United States’ Senate (2009) Statement of Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 3 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House (2009a) ‘Remarks by the President on a New Strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, 27 March’, http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-on-a-New-Strategy-for-Afghanistan-andPakistan/, date accessed 16 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House (2009b) Remarks by the President in Address to the Nation on the Way Forward in Afghanistan and Pakistan, West Point, 1 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House (2011) ‘Report to Congress on Afghanistan and Pakistan’, http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/UNCLASS%20Report%20on%20Afghanistan%20and%20Pakistan.pdf, date accessed 16 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, B. (2010) Obama’s War (London: Simon & Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Benjamin Schreer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, Sweden

    Håkan Edström (Research Fellow) & Dennis Gyllensporre (Research Fellow) (Research Fellow) &  (Research Fellow)

Copyright information

© 2012 Benjamin Schreer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schreer, B. (2012). The Evolution of NATO’s Strategy in Afghanistan. In: Edström, H., Gyllensporre, D. (eds) Pursuing Strategy. New Security Challenges Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230364196_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation