Skip to main content

Avoiding Unambiguity: Tensions in School Governing

  • Chapter
Hybrid Forms of Governance

Abstract

As in many countries, the Danish public school system has in recent years been involved in a variety of assessments and international comparisons. Organizations such as the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have conducted a number of PISA investigations and reviews of specific subjects either comparing national school systems or explaining factors in single countries. In a political context as well as in a broader public sense these assessments have resulted in a great deal of attention with their findings of how Danish public schools lack a culture of evaluation. In fact the final conclusion of an OECD review from 2004 stated that a culture of evaluation ‘is the one single factor that it is most important to achieve if standards are to be raised’ (OECD 2004: 129).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Andersen, N. Å, and Thygesen, N. T. (2004) Styringsteknologier i den selvudsatte organisation [Steering technologies in the self-exposed organization]. GRUS, (73).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Danish Evaluation Institute (2004) L0bende evaluering af elevernes udbytte af undervisningen i folkeskolen [Continuous evaluation of pupils’ benefits from teaching in the public school]. Copenhagen: The Danish Evaluation Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Danish Ministry of Education (2004) The OECD Report about the Danish School System: Results and Implications. Copenhagen: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Danish Ministry of Education (2007a) Udvikling af skolens evalueringskapacitet [Development of the capacity of schools to evaluate]. Report on the development of evaluation in schools produced by the Danish Ministry of Education. www.evaluering.uvm.dk.

  • The Danish Ministry of Education (2007b) Evalueringskultur i skolen [A culture of evaluation in the school]. Report on the development of evaluation in schools produced by the Danish Ministry of Education. www.evaluering.uvm.dk.

  • The Danish Ministry of Education (2007c) Lærerlogbog [Teacher logbook]. An evaluation tool for teachers produced by the Danish Ministry of Education. www.evaluering.uvm.dk.

  • The Danish Ministry of Education (2007d) Almindelige test, prøver og opgave I skolen [Ordinary tests, exams and exercises in the school]. An evaluation tool for teachers produced by the Danish Ministry of Education. www.evaluering.uvm.dk.

  • The Danish Ministry of Education (2007e) Test er et værktøj for lærerne [The test is a tool for teachers]. Report on the development of evaluation in schools produced by the Danish Ministry of Education. www.evaluering.uvm.dk.

  • The Danish Ministry of Education (2007f) Evaluering og skoleudvikling [Evaluation and school development]. Report on the development of evaluation in schools produced by the Danish Ministry of Education. www.evaluering.uvm.dk.

  • The Danish Ministry of Education (2007g) Evaluering I undervisningen er en del af lærerens professionelle virke [Evaluation in teaching is a part of the teacher’s professional work]. An evaluation tool for teachers produced by the Danish Ministry of Education. www.evaluering.uvm.dk.

  • The Danish Ministry of Education (2007h) Undervisningsiagttagelse [Observation of teaching]. An evaluation tool for teachers produced by the Danish Ministry of Education. www.evaluering.uvm.dk.

  • The Danish Ministry of Education (2007i) Fremme af evalueringskulturen [Promotion of a culture of evaluation]. Report on the development of evaluation in schools produced by the Danish Ministry of Education. www.evaluering.uvm.dk.

  • Dean, M. (1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2003) Kulturstyring og individualisering [Culture governance and individualization], in C. Borch and L. T Larsen (eds) Perspektiv, magt og styring [Perspective, Power and Steering]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2007) Governing Societies: Political Perspectives on Domestic and International Rule. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1981): Giv tid [Give time]. Transcription of a lecture at Copenhagen University 16 February 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997) Technologies of the self. In The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, Vol. 1. New York: The New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2000) The subject and power, in j. D. Faubion (ed.) Michel Foucault: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M., Lingard, B., Rizvi, E, and Taylor, S. (2001). The OECD, Globalization and Education Policy. Oxford: IAU Press. Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, L. (2007) Hvem tester testen? en analyse af folkeskolens nationale it-baserede test med dansk/læsning som eksempel [Who will test the test? An analysis of the national it-based test in the public school using the Danish/ reading as an example]. In L. Moos (ed.), Nye sociale teknologier i folkeskolen: kampen om danneisen [New social technologies in the public school: the struggle of education] (p. 67). Frederikshavn: Dafolo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. and Grek, S. (2007) The OECD, indicators and PISA: An exploration of events and theoretical perspectives, fabricating quality in European education. Working Paper. www.ces.ed.ac.uk.

  • Lingard, B., Rawolle, S. and Taylor, S. (eds) (2005) Globalizing policy sociology in education: Working with Bourdieu. Journal of Educational policy 20. 6: 759–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990) Political Theory in the Welfare State. New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (1995a): Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995b) The paradoxy of observing systems. Cultural Critique 31.37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1998) Love as Passion: The Codification of Intimacy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2002): Deconstruction as second-order observation. In Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2004) Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1990) Governing Economic Life, Economy and Society, 19.1, 1–31. dx.doi.org.

  • Moos, L. (2007) Det offentlige: Djævelen ligger i detaljen [The devil is in the detail]. Comment in the Danish newspaper Information, 22 October 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004) OECD-rapport om grundskolen i Danmark — 2004 [OECD-report of the public school in Denmark — 2004]. Uddannelsesstyrelsens temahæfteserie nr. 5 — 2004. Copenhagen: The Danish Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, J. and Lingard, B. (2007) Globalization, education policy and politics. In The Routledge-Falmer Reader in Education Policy and Politics, ed. B. Lingard, and J. Ozga, pp. 65–82. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos (2003) Suspension of suspension: settling for the improbable. Law and Literature 15.3, pp. 345–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2003) At regere friheden: en analyse af politisk magt i avancerede liberale demokratier [To rule freedom: an analysis of political power in advanced liberal states], in C. Borch and L. T. Larsen (eds), Perspektiv, magt og styring [Perspective, Power and Steering]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., Rizvi, E, Lingard, B., and Henry, M. (1997). Educational Policy and the Politics of Change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (2006) Paradoxes and Inconsistencies in Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, Helmut (1992b) Prinzipien politischer Supervision. In Busshoff, H. (ed.) Politische Steurung. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, Helmut (1992a) Ironie des Staates: Grundlinien einer Staatstheorie Polyzentrischer Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, Helmut (1997) Supervision des Staates. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Justine Grønbæk Pors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pors, J.G. (2012). Avoiding Unambiguity: Tensions in School Governing. In: Andersen, N.Å., Sand, IJ. (eds) Hybrid Forms of Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230363007_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics