Abstract
This chapter summarizes research within Young Lives into early childhood transitions,2 looking at children’s experiences within early childhood and primary education in three of the four Young Lives study countries. Numerous lines of research have converged to produce a compelling case for prioritizing early childhood care and education (ECCE) services. Research demonstrates that the earliest years of a child’s life are a crucial period of biological, neurological, psychological, social, and emotional growth and change; that poverty and other disadvantages can impact in numerous (and in some respects irreversible) ways on ‘developmental potential’ and that well-planned early interventions can have long-term positive outcomes for children. Economic analyses have shown that access to high-quality early childhood care and education is not only good for children’s development, it is also an important pro-poor strategy capable of increasing equity. It can also be cost-effective, with some well-designed programmes calculating high rates of return from early ‘investment in human capital’. Underlying all these persuasive lines of analysis is the principle on which all initiatives should be built — that young children have a right to development and to education in their best interests, without discrimination (summarized in Woodhead 2006; and Siraj-Blatchford and Woodhead 2009: see also Chapters 6, 8, and 9 in this volume).
The early transitions stream within Young Lives has been supported by the Bernard van Leer Foundation, which funds and shares knowledge about work in early childhood development and child rights (www.bernardvanleer.org). Many Young Lives colleagues contributed to the research reported in this paper, especially Yisak Tafere and Workneh Abebe (Ethiopia); Uma Vennam and Anuradha Komanduri (Andhra Pradesh, India); Patricia Ames and Vanessa Rojas (Peru); and Gina Crivello, Laura Camfield, Natalia Streuli, Lita Cameron and Karin Heissler (Oxford).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ames, P., V. Rojas and T. Portugal (2009) Starting School: Who is Prepared? Young Lives’ Research on Children’s Transition to First Grade in Peru, Working Paper 47, Oxford: Young Lives.
Ames, P., V. Rojas and T. Portugal (2010) Continuity and Respect for Diversity: Strengthening Early Transitions in Peru, Working Paper 56, The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.
Arnold, C, K. Bartlett, S. Gowani and R. Merali (2007) Is Everybody Ready? Readiness, Transition and Continuity: Reflections and Moving Forward, Working Paper 41, The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.
CIRCUS (2006) Focus on Children under Six, New Delhi: Citizen’s Initiative for the Rights of Children under Six.
Government of India (2009) ‘The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009’, New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development.
Murray, H. (2010) Early Childhood Care and Education as a Strategy for Poverty Reduction: Evidence from Young Lives, Policy Brief 9, Oxford: Young Lives.
OECD (2001) Starting Strong: Early Childhood Education and Care, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
OECD (2006) Starting Strong II: Early Childhood Education and Care, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Orkin, K., W. Abebe et al. (forthcoming) Delivering Quality Early Learning in Low-resource Settings: Progress and Challenges in Ethiopia, Working Paper, The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.
Siraj-Blatchford, I. and M. Woodhead (2009) Effective Early Childhood Programmes, Early Childhood in Focus 4, Milton Keynes: Open University.
Streuli, N, U. Vennam and M. Woodhead (2011) Increasing Choice or Inequality? Pathways through Early Education in Andhra Pradesh, India, Working Paper 58, The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (2005) ‘General Comment No. 7: Implementing Child Rights in Early Childhood’, CRC/C/GC/7/Rev.l., Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
UNESCO (2007) Education For All by2015: Will We Make It? Global Monitoring Report 2008, Paris: UNESCO.
Vennam, U., A. Komanduri, E. Cooper, G. Crivello and M. Woodhead (2009) Early Childhood Education Trajectories and Transitions: A Study of the Experiences and Perspectives of Parents and Children in Andhra Pradesh, India, Working Paper 52, Oxford: Young Lives.
Vogler, P., G. Crivello and M. Woodhead (2008) Early Childhood Transitions Research: A Review of Concepts, Theory, and Practice, Working Paper 48, The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.
Woodhead, M. (2006) ‘Changing Perspectives on Early Childhood: Theory, Research and Policy’, International Journal of Equity and Innovation in Early Childhood 4.2: 5–48.
Woodhead, M. and P. Moss (2007) Early Childhood and Primary Education, Early Childhood in Focus 2, Milton Keynes: Open University.
Woodhead, M., P. Ames, U. Vennam, W. Abebe and N. Streuli (2009) Equity and Quality? Challenges for Early Childhood and Primary Education in Ethiopia, India and Peru, Working Paper 55, The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Martin Woodhead
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woodhead, M. (2012). Pathways through Early Childhood Education in Ethiopia, India, and Peru: Rights, Equity, and Diversity. In: Boyden, J., Bourdillon, M. (eds) Childhood Poverty. Palgrave Studies on Children and Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362796_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362796_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33982-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-36279-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)