Skip to main content

Labor Market Institutions, Skills, and Innovation Style: A Critique of the ‘Varieties of Capitalism’ Perspective

  • Chapter

Abstract

Recent work on innovation performance within the national systems of innovation (NSI) framework has sought to go beyond the focus in the seminal contributions on science-industry links and the R&D activities of industrial firms (Nelson, 1993) or on the nature of user-producer relations promoting interactive learning (Lundvall, 1992). The more recent work has sought to widen the NSI perspective by exploring the way labor market institutions and systems of social protection impact on employee learning and innovation outcomes (Lorenz and Lundvall, 2006; Holms et al., 2010). A focus on the institutional determinants of the innovative performance of firms is also a hallmark of research on the varieties of capitalism (VoC) by Hall and Soskice (2001), who were perhaps the first to emphasize the way labor markets and vocational training systems shape differences in innovation style across nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akkermanns, D., Castaldi, C. and Los, B. (2009), ‘Do “liberal market economies” really innovate more radically than “coordinated market economies”? Hall and Soskice reconsidered’, 2009, Research Policy, 38, 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arundel, A., Lorenz, E., Lundvall, B.-Å. and Valeyre, A. (2007), ‘How Europe’s economies learn: a comparison of work organization and innovation mode for the EU-15’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(6), 1175–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, M. (2009), ‘Asset specificity, institutional complementarities and the variety of skill regimes in coordinated market economies’, Socio-Economic Review, 7(3), 375–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class, New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (2001), Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, A.M. (2008), ‘Rethinking the link between labour market flexibility and corporate competitiveness: a critique of the institutionalist literature’, Socio-Economic Review, 6, 637–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, J.E., Lorenz, B-A., Lundvall, B.-Å. and Valeyre, A. (2010), ‘Organisational learning and systems of labour market regulation in Europe”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(4), 1141–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (2006), ‘The Learning Organisation and National Systems of Competence Building and Innovation’, in E. Lorenz and B.-Å. Lundvall (eds) How Europe’s Economies Learn: Coordinating Competing Models, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, K. (2009), ‘Institutional embeddedness and the strategic leeway of actors: the case of the German therapeutical biotech industry’, Socio-Economic Review, 7(2), 181–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (eds) (2006), How Europe’s Economies Learn: Coordinating Competing Models, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (2009), ‘Measuring Creativity in the European Union’, in E. Villalba (ed.) Can Creativity be Measured, EUR Report, DG Education and Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979), The Structuring of Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1996), Beyond Boundaries: Open Labor Markets and Learning in Silicon Valley, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (1991), ‘On the institutional conditions of diversified quality production’, in E. Matzner and W. Streeck (eds), Beyond Keynesianism, Aldershot, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (1992), Social Institutions and Economic Performance: Studies of Industrial Relations in Advanced Capitalist Economies, London, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2004), ‘Empirical evidence against Varieties of Capitalism’s theory of technological innovation’, International Organization, 58, 601–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg, M. (1990), ‘A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations’, The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. and Anderson, P. (1986), ‘Technological discontinuities and organizational environments’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(3), 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Edward Lorenz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lorenz, E. (2012). Labor Market Institutions, Skills, and Innovation Style: A Critique of the ‘Varieties of Capitalism’ Perspective. In: Asheim, B.T., Parrilli, M.D. (eds) Interactive Learning for Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362420_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics