Skip to main content

Innovation and Competence Building in the Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy

  • Chapter
Interactive Learning for Innovation

Abstract

The idea that knowledge matters for the economy is far from new. Adam Smith (1776) refers to the division of labor among specialized ‘men of speculation’ as an important source of innovation. Friedrich List (1841) argues that the most important form of capital is ‘mental capital’. Karl Marx (1868) pointed to science as an important productive force. In the twentieth century the British scholar Bernal (1936) proposed that raising investments in R&D from 0.2 to 2% in Great Britain would stimulate the economy and bring a new kind of economic growth, and a similar message was formulated in The Endless Frontier by Vannevar Bush (1945), which laid the foundation of post-war science policy in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abramowitz, M. and David, P. (1996), ‘Technological change and the rise of intangible investments: The US economy’s growth path in the twentieth century’, in Foray, D. and Lundvall B.-Å. (eds.), Employment and Growth in the Knowledge Based Economy, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. and Cohendet, P. (2004), Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1962a), ‘The economic implications of learning by doing’, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. XXIX, No. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1962b) ‘Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention’, in Nelson, R.R. (ed.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1971), ‘Political and economic evaluation of social effects and externalities’, in Intrilligator, M. (ed.), Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1974), The Limits of Organisation, New York, W.W. Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal J.D. (1939), The Social Function of Science, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V. (1945), Science: The Endless Frontier, A Report to the President, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B. and Stankiewitz, R. (1991), ‘On the nature, function and composition of technological systems’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R., P.A. David, D. Foray (2000), ‘The explicit economics ok knowledge codification and tacitness’, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 9, pp. 211–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D. (2000), The Economics of Knowledge, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D. and B.-Å. Lundvall (1996), ‘The knowledge-based economy: from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy’ in Foray, D. and B.-Å. Lundvall (eds.), Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-based Economy, OECD Documents, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand, O. (2004), ‘Innovation and intellectual property rights’ in Fagerberg, J., D.C. Mowery, and R.R. Nelson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., Lorenz, E. and Lundvall B.-Å. (2002) ‘Why all this about codified and tacit knowledge?’, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, F. (1841): Das Nationale System der Politischen Ökonomie, Basel: Kyklos (translated and published under the title: The National System of Political Economy’ by Longmans, Green and Co., London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1985), Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction, Aalborg, Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A. (2002), ‘The university in the learning economy’, DRUID Working Paper no. 6, Aalborg Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (2006), ‘Interactive learning, social capital and economic performance’, Foray, D. and Kahin, B. (eds.), Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. Å. (2007), Higher Education, Innovation and Economic Development, Paper presented at the World Bank’s Regional Bank Conference on Development Economics, Beijing, 16–17 January 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. and Borras, S. (2005), ‘Science, technology, innovation and knowledge policy’, in Fagerberg, J., D. Mowery and R.R. Nelson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Norfolk, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å and Johnson, B. (1994), ‘The learning economy’, Journal of Industry Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2, December 1994, pp. 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å, Rasmussen, P. and Lorenz, E. (2008), ‘Education in the learning economy: a European perspective’, Policy Futures in Education, Vol. 6, No. 2., 681–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen A. (1996), ‘Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts’, Economic Geography, Vol. 72, No. 3, 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A.P. (1923), Industry and Trade, London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R.J. and Nelson, R.R. (1984), ‘Production and innovation when techniques are tacit’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, Vol. 5, pp. 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. (1959), ‘The simple economics of basic economic research’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 67, pp. 323–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. and E. S. Phelps (1966), ‘Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth’, American Economic Review, Vol. 56, No. 1/2, pp. 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R.N. (2007), Innovation, human resources, and academic labour: Introduction of highly educated labour in small Danish firms, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Business Studies, Aalborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1963), Science, Economic Growth and Government Policy, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1971), Science, Growth and Society, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1992), Technology and the Economy, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1994), The OECD Jobs Study — Facts, Analysis, Strategies, Paris, OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1996), Transitions to Learning Economies and Societies, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1999), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 1999: Benchmarking Knowledge-based Economies, Paris, OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2000), Knowledge Management in the Learning Society, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001), The New Economy: Beyond the Hype, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1998), ‘Technologies, products and organisation in the innovating firm: What Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn’t’, paper presented at the DRUID 1998 Summer conference, Bornhom, June 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1959/1995), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1982), Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. (1977), ‘The characteristics of successful innovators and technically progressive firms’, R&D Management, Vol. 7, No 3, pp. 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. and Varian, H.R. (1999), Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Boston, Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of Learning, New York, Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, M. (1999), ‘The learning economy and embodied knowledge flows in Great Britain’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958/1978), Personal Knowledge, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966), The Tacit Dimension, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1975), ‘The value of the ability to deal with disequilibria’, Journal of Economic Literature, pp. 827–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999), Development as Freedom, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776/1904), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (5th edition), London, Methuen and Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinding, A.L. (2004), ‘Human resources, absorptive capacity and innovative performance’, in Christensen J.L. and Lundvall, B.-Å. (Eds.), Product Innovation, Interactive Learning and Economic Performance, Amsterdam, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, S. and Nabeshima, K. (eds.) (2007), How Universities Promote Economic Growth, Washington, DC, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Bengt-Åke Lundvall and Edward Lorenz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lundvall, BÅ., Lorenz, E. (2012). Innovation and Competence Building in the Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy. In: Asheim, B.T., Parrilli, M.D. (eds) Interactive Learning for Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362420_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics