Abstract
This chapter explores the peculiar phenomena associated with elites and the desire to be under surveillance. That is often understood as part of a broader desire to protect themselves and their possessions from harm, loss, etc. More specifically, the chapter focuses on surveillance as part of the ‘Fortress America’ movement that emerged as a topic of scholarly discussion from the neoclassical book by Blakely and Snyder (1997) examining gated communities in the USA. Specifically, there are two ideas emerging from this exercise, which have not made it to the forefront of discussions of elites and elite theory. The first involves the application of design strategies in gated communities that reflect Bentham’s (1995) concept of the panopticon. Briefly, the panopticon traditionally has been employed in the construction of hospitals and prisons. Oddly, these same panopticon designs have both in part and in total become commonplace in gated communities throughout the USA across multiple socio-economic strata. The second idea concerns the privatisation and commodification of the civic in general, along with an associated privatisation and commodification of public goods and services in particular. Both observations can be tied explicitly to our contemporary understating of elites and their associated trappings as part of a broader desire to buy ‘the good life’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Avila, E. (2005) Popular Culture in the Age of White Flight: Fear and Fantasy in Suburban Los Angeles (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Baudrillard, J. (2000) Simulacra and Simulation (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
Bentham, J. (1995) The Panopticon Writings, ed. M. Bozovic (London: Verso), 29–95.
Blakely, E. and Snyder, M. (1997) Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press).
Bowman, J., West, J. and Gertz, S. (2006) ‘Florida’s Service First: Radical Reform in the Sunshine State’. In J. Kellough and L. Nigro (eds.), Civil Service Reform in the States (Albany, NY: SUNY Press), 145–70.
Bybee, C. (1999) ‘Can Democracy Survive in the Post-Factual Age? A Return to the Lippmann–Dewey Debate About the Politics of News’, Journalism and Communication Monographs, 1 (1): 29–62.
Crawford, M. (1995) Building the Workingman’s Paradise: The Design of American Company Towns (New York: Verso).
Debord, G. (1967/1995) The Society of the Spectacle, trans. D. Nicholson-Smith (New York: Zone Books).
Edelman, M. (1988) Constructing the Political Spectacle (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Pantheon).
Foucault, M. (1994) The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception (New York: Vintage Books).
Francombe, J. (2010) ‘I Cheer, You Cheer, We Cheer’: Physical Technologies and the Normalized Body’, Television & New Media, 11 (5): 350–66.
Grant, J. and Mittelsteadt, L. (2004) ‘Types of Gated Communities’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31 (6): 913–30.
Lang, S. (2004) ‘The Impact of Video Systems on Architecture’. Dissertation submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich.
Lippmann, W. (2008) The Phantom Public (New Brunswick, CT: Transaction Publishers).
Low, S. (2001) ‘The Edge and the Center: Gated Communities and the Discourse of Urban Fear’, American Anthropologist, 103 (1): 45–58.
Marx, K. (1867/1984) Capital [Das Kapital], trans. S. Moore and E. Aveling, ed. F. Engels (Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.).
Mills, C. (1956/2000) The Power Elite (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Rindfleisch, A., Freeman, D. and Burroughs, J. (2000) ‘Nostalgia, Materialism, and Product Preference: An Initial Inquiry’. In S. J. Hoch and R. J. Meyer (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 27 (Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research), 36–41.
Rose, N. (2000) ‘Community, Citizenship, and the Third Way’, American Behavioral Scientist, 43 (9): 1395–1411.
Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S. and Earls, F. (1997) ‘Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy’, Science, 15 (277): 918–24.
Sanchez, T., Lang, R. and Dhavale, D. (2005) Security versus status? A first look at the cen-sus’s geted community data, Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (3) 281–291.
Sementelli, A. (2007) ‘Managing Blurred Environments: How Usufruct Can Help Address Postmodern Conditions’, Administration and Society, 38 (6): 709–28.
Smith, A. (1776 [1977]) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Somers, M. (2008) ‘Imperiled Citizenship and the Market (Critical Essay)’, The Hedgehog Review, 10 (3): 80–92.
Sugrue, T. (2005) The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Wilson-Doenges, G. (2000) ‘An Exploration of Sense of Community and Fear of Crime in Gated Communities’, Environment and Behavior, 32 (5): 597–611.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Arthur Sementelli
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sementelli, A. (2012). Panopticism, Elites and the Deinstitutionalisation of the Civic. In: Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N. (eds) Global Elites. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362406_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362406_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32655-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-36240-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)