Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Leadership Hubris: Achilles’ Heel of Success

  • Chapter
Global Elites

  • 201 Accesses

Abstract

Rooted in mythology, ancient Greek society considered hubris as man’s capital sin (Wiener, 1973). Hubris (or hybris) is the pretension to be godlike, and thereby fail to observe the divine equilibrium among god, man and nature. The essential element of hubris is extreme confidence that can lead to arrogance and other dark side leadership attributes. In ancient Greek mythology, the gods relentlessly struck down those who were excessively confident, presumptuous, blindly ambitious or otherwise lacking humility (Grimal, 1986). Scholars have defined hubris as:

  • A state of mind in which man thinks more than human thoughts and later translates them into act. It is an offence against the order of the world (Grene, 1961: 487).

  • The arrogant violation of limits set by the gods or by human society (North, 1966: 6).

  • Having energy or power and misusing it self-indulgently (MacDowell, 1976: 21).

  • Behaviour that is intended gratuitously to inflict dishonour and shame upon others or to the values that hold a society together (Fisher, 1979: 32, 45).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abma, T. A. (2000) ‘Fostering Learning-in-Organizing through Narration: Questioning Myths and Stimulating Multiplicity in Two Performing Arts Schools’, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 9(2): 211–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini, V. and Bowman, C. (2001) ‘Tacit Knowledge: Some Suggestions for Operationalization’, Journal of Management Studies, 38 (6): 811–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beech, N. (2000) ‘Narrative Styles of Managers and Workers: A Tale of Star-Crossed Lovers’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36 (2): 210–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkovitch, E. and Narayanan, M. P. (1993) ‘Motives for Takeovers: An Empirical Investigation’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28: 347–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. M. (1998) ‘The Postmodern Turn from Stories-as-Objects to Stories-inContext Methods’, Research Methods Forum, 3. Available at http://www.aom.pace.edu/rmd/1998_forum_postmodern_stories.html (accessed 23 May 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J. (1988) Self-esteem at Work: Research, Theory and Practice (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. and Burgess, R. G. (eds.) (1994) Analyzing Qualitative Data (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C. and Meindl, J. R. (1991) ‘The Construction of Leadership Images in the Popular Press: The Case of Donald Burr and People’s Express’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 521–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, S. E. and Schwenk, C. R. (1991) ‘Self-serving Attributions, Managerial Cognition and Company Performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 12: 219–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortazzi, M. (2001) ‘Narrative Analysis in Ethnography’. In P. Atkinson (ed.), Handbook of Ethnography (London: Sage), 384–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K. (2001) ‘Stories as Case Knowledge: Case Knowledge as Stories’, Medical Education, 35 (9): 862–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, Richard A. (1990) ‘Top Managerial Prestige and Organizational Bankruptcy’, Organization Science, 1: 123–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, I. (1993) Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. and Bourgeois, L. J. (1988) ‘Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory’, Academy of Management Journal, 31: 737–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, B. (1998) ‘Toward a Rhetoric of Change’, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 12 (2): 217–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felton, R. F. (2004) ‘What Directors and Investors Want from Governance Reform: A Survey of Directors and Institutional Investors Shows that Board Governance Has a Long Way to Go’, McKinsey Quarterly, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954) ‘A Theory of Social Comparison Processes’, Human Relations, 7: 117–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M. (1980) ‘Takeovers, Shareholder Returns and the Theory of the Firm’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94: 235–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, N. R. E. (1979) ‘Hybris and Dishonour: II’, Greece and Rome, 26 (1): 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. (1998) ‘Same Old Story or Changing Stories? Folkloric, Modern and Postmodern Mutations’. In D. Grant, T. Keenoy and C. Oswick (eds.), Discourse and Organisation (London: Sage), 84–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, D. (1961) ‘Herodotus: The Historian as Dramatist’, Journal of Philosophy, 58 (18): 477–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimal, P. (1986) The Dictionary of Classical Mythology (New York: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, L., Berscheid, E. and Walster, E. (1971) ‘Self-esteem and attraction’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17: 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. (1972) Victims of Groupthink (New York: Houghton Mifflin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse, N. K. and Kakabadse, A. P. (2005) ‘Discretionary Leadership: From Control/Coordination to Value Co-Creation’. In C. L. Cooper (ed.), Leadership and Management in the 21st Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 57–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse, A. P., Kakabadse, N. K. and Lee-Davies, L. (2007) ‘Three Temptations of Leaders’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28 (3): 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keasey, K., Short, H. and Wright, M. (eds.) (2005) Corporate Governance: Accountability, Enterprise and International Comparisons (Chichester: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keay, A. R. (2006) ‘Enlightened Shareholder Value, the Reform of the Duties of Company Directors and the Corporate Objective’, Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 3: 335–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1971) Attribution in Social Interaction (New York: General Learning Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kets de Vries, M. F. R. and Miller, D. (1985) ‘Narcissism and Leadership: An Object Relations Perspective’, Human Relations, 38 (6): 583–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Linde, C. (2001) ‘Narrative and Social Tacit Knowledge’, Journal of Knowledge Management, 5 (2): 160–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDowell, D. M. (1976) ‘Hybris in Athens’, Greece and Rome, 23 (1): 14–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. and Simon, H. A. (1958) Organizations (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1988) The Long Interview (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. R. and Dukerich, J. M. (1985) ‘The Romance of Leadership’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 78–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis: A New Sourcebook of Methods (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1997) Images of Organisation (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • North, H. (1966) Sophrosyne: Self-Knowledge and Self-Restraint in Greek Literature (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. A. (1997) ‘Decisions Made in the Absence of Formal Delegation of Power’, Local Government Law Journal, 2, LBC Information Services, Sydney, NSW: 225–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1981) Apology, ed. J. J. Helm (New York: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988) Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences (New York: State of New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J. (1993) ‘Current Concepts in the Narcissistic Personality: Implications for Political Psychology’, Political Psychology, 14 (1): 99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. K. (1993) Narrative Analysis (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1986) ‘The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers’, Journal of Business, 59: 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronfeldt, D. (1994) Beware the Hubris–Nemesis Complex: A Concept for Leadership Analysis (Santa Monica: Rand).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. J. and Rubin, I. S. (2005) Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data (2nd edn.) (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R. and Ragan, J. W. (1986) ‘Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil’s Advocacy and Consensus’, Academy of Management Journal, 29: 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheard, A. G., Kakabadse, A. P. and Kakabadse, N. K. (2009) ‘Organisational Politics: The Shadow Side of Leadership’, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance, Hellenic American University, Athens, Greece, 5–6 November, 232–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953) Science and Human Behavior (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. H. and Milliken, F. J. (1988) ‘Executives’ Perceptual Filters: What They Notice and How They Make Sense’. In D. C. Hambrick (ed.), The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press), 35–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M. (1976) ‘Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A Study of Escalating Commitment to a Failing Course of Action’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16: 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. I. and Callahan, A. (1987) ‘The Stigma of Bankruptcy: Spoiled Organizational Image and its Management’, Academy of Management Journal, 30: 405–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M., Sigafoos, J. and Bushell, H. (1998) ‘Use of Noncontingent Reinforcement in the Treatment of Challenging Behavior’, Behavior Modification, 22: 529–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P. and Seward, J. K. (1990) ‘On the Efficiency of Internal and External Corporate Control Mechanisms’, Academy of Management Review, 15: 421–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, P. P. (1973) Dictionary of the History of Ideas (New York: Scribner).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. A. G. Sheard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nada K. Kakabadse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew P. Kakabadse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Doughty Centre, Cranfield University’s School of Management, UK

    Andrew Kakabadse (Professor of International Management Development) (Professor of International Management Development)

  2. University of Northampton, Business School, UK

    Nada Kakabadse (Professor in Management and Business Research, Visiting Professor at US, Australian, French, Kazakhstani and Chinese universities) (Professor in Management and Business Research, Visiting Professor at US, Australian, French, Kazakhstani and Chinese universities)

Copyright information

© 2012 A. G. Sheard, Nada K. Kakabadse and Andrew P. Kakabadse

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sheard, A.G., Kakabadse, N.K., Kakabadse, A.P. (2012). Leadership Hubris: Achilles’ Heel of Success. In: Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N. (eds) Global Elites. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362406_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation