Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Delicate Empiricism: An Action Learning Approach to Elite Interviewing

  • Chapter
Global Elites

Abstract

This chapter presents a practical framework useful to both young and well-seasoned researchers who are about to embark on qualitative research studies requiring interviews with the elite, ‘a short-hand term for those actors who [people] perceive as more powerful or privileged than some undefined group’ (Woods, 1998: 2101).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aberbach, J. D. and Rockman, B. A. (2002) ‘Conducting and Coding Elites Interviews’, Political Sciences and Politics, 35 (4): 673–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackroyd, S. and Hughes, J. A. (1981) Data Collection in Context (London: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Antle, B. J. and Regehr, C. (2003) ‘Beyond Individual Rights and Freedoms: Metaethics in Social Work Research’, Social Work, 48 (1): 135–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendell, T. (1997) ‘Reflections on the Researcher–Researched Relationship: A Woman Interviewing Men’, Qualitative Sociology, 20 (3): 341–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1908) The Works of Aristotle, ed. D. Ross, 12 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barfield, O. (1988) Saving Appearances: A Study of Idolatry (2nd edn.) (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. L. (2007) Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (6th edn.) (London: Pearson International Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. M. (2002) ‘Validity and Reliability Issues in Elite Interviewing’, Political Sciences and Politics, 35 (4): 679–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. S. Y. (1999) ‘Collecting Data by In-depth Interviewing’. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Sussex at Brighton, 2–5 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986) ‘The Forms of Capital’. In J. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (New York: Greenwood Press), 241–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2008) Social Research Methods (3rd edn.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, N. and McCaslin, M. (2003) ‘Meta-Inquiry: An Approach to Interview Success’, The Qualitative Report, 8 (4): 549–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covey, S. R. (1992) The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People: Restoring the Character Ethic (New York: Simon & Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. H. J. (2001) ‘Spies as Informants: Triangulation and the Interpretation of Elite Interview Data in the Study of the Intelligence and Security Services’, Politics, 21 (1): 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitz, J. and Halpin, D. (1995) ‘“Brief Encounter”: Researching Education Policy-Making in Elite Settings’. In J. Salisbury and S. Delamont (eds.), Qualitative Studies in Education (Aldershot: Avebury), 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethe, J. W. von (1781/2003) Wie herrlich leuchtet die Natur: Gedichte und Bilder (Berlin: Insel Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, M. L., Bowman, A. O., Lester, J. P. and O’Toole, J. L. (1990) Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation (London: Scott, Foresman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, K. (2002) ‘Getting in the Door: Sampling and Completing Elite Interviews’, Political Sciences and Politics, 35 (4): 669–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1992) ‘Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology’. In N. Nohria and R. G. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organisations: Structure, Form and Action (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, R. and Imber, J. B. (eds.) (1995) Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P. M. (1995) ‘Tales from the Field: Learning from Researchers’ Accounts’. In R. Hertz and J. B. Imber (eds.), Studying Elites Using Qualitative Methods (London: Sage), 40–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. (1993) ‘Local Knowledge and Local Power: Notes on the Ethnography of Local Community Elites’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22 (1): 36–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janesick, V. (1998) Stretching: Exercises for Qualitative Researchers (Thousand Oaks: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahl, J. (1957) The American Class Structure (New York: Rinehart).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse, N. and Kakabadse, A. (2009) ‘Thinking about Research’, Research Seminar, Copenhagen Business School (CBS), 19 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse, N., Kakabadse, A. and Kalu, K. (2007) ‘Communicative Action through Collaborative Inquiry: Journey of a Facilitating Co-Inquirer’, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 20 (3): 245–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, N. (1997) ‘Interviewing Joshua: On the Importance of Leaving Room for Serendipity’, Qualitative Inquiry, 3 (3): 326–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. (1995) Dangerous Fieldwork. Qualitative Research Methods Series, vol. 34 (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1942) ‘Field Theory and Learning’. In K. Lewin, Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers, ed. D. Cartwight (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 238–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, M. (2000) ‘Corporate Political Strategy and Legislative Decision Making’, Business and Society, 39 (1): 76–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. D. and Salovey, P. (1997) ‘What is Emotional Intelligence?’ In P. Salovey and D. J. Slayter (eds.), Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence: Educational Implications (New York: Basic Books), 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1988) The Long Interview (Newbury Park, CA and London: Sage).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen. R. and Knussen, C. (2002) Research Methods for Social Science: An Introduction (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, C., Buller, D. B., Buller, M. K. and Larkey, L. L. (1999) ‘Toward an Organisational Perspective on Identifying and Managing Formal Gatekeepers’, Qualitative Sociology, 22 (1): 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peabody, R. L. et al. (1990) ‘Interviewing Political Elites’, Political Science and Politics, 23 (3): 451–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powdermaker, H. (1966) Stranger and Friend: The Way of an Anthropologist (New York: W. W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapley, T. (2004) ‘Interviews’. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium and D. Silverman (eds.), Qualitative Research Practice (London: Sage), 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revans, R. W. (1982) The Origin and Growth of Action Learning (Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, D. (1996) ‘Elite Interviewing: Approaches and Pitfalls’, Politics, 16 (3): 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodham, K. (2000) ‘Role Theory and the Analysis of Managerial Work: The Case of Occupational Health Professionals’, Journal of Applied Management Studies, 9 (1): 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roulston, K. (2010) Reflective Interviewing: A Guide to Theory and Practice (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenberger, E. (1991) ‘The Corporate Interview as an Evidentiary Strategy in Human Geography’, The Professional Geographer, 43: 180–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, O. (2007) ‘Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling’, Political Science & Politics, 40 (4): 765–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. G. and Jones, M. (1999) ‘Researching Local Elites: Reflexivity, “Situatedness” and Political-Temporal Contingency’, Geoforum, 30 (4): 301–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, C., Marschan-Piekkari, R., Penttinen, H., and Tahvanainen, M. (2002) ‘Interviewing Elites in International Organisations: A Balancing Act for the Researcher’, Paper presented at the 25th Annual Conference of EIBA, Manchester School of Management, 12–14 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L. M. (1998) ‘The Ethics of Rapport: Institutional Safeguards, Resistance and Betrayal’, Qualitative Inquiry, 4 (2): 178–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M. (1998) ‘Rethinking Elites: Networks, Space, and Local Politics’, Environment and Planning, 30: 2101–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W. (1995) ‘Qualitative Personal Interviews in International Business Research: Some Lessons from a Study of Hong Kong Transnational Corporations’, International Business Review, 4 (3): 313–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Nada K. Kakabadse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eddy Louchart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Doughty Centre, Cranfield University’s School of Management, UK

    Andrew Kakabadse (Professor of International Management Development) (Professor of International Management Development)

  2. University of Northampton, Business School, UK

    Nada Kakabadse (Professor in Management and Business Research, Visiting Professor at US, Australian, French, Kazakhstani and Chinese universities) (Professor in Management and Business Research, Visiting Professor at US, Australian, French, Kazakhstani and Chinese universities)

Copyright information

© 2012 Nada K. Kakabadse and Eddy Louchart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kakabadse, N.K., Louchart, E. (2012). Delicate Empiricism: An Action Learning Approach to Elite Interviewing. In: Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N. (eds) Global Elites. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230362406_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation