Abstract
For those of us engaged in the feminist project of seeking to understand social relations, social formations and subjectivities, the cultural turn has posed radical challenges and opened up new ways of thinking. If the terrain that I am calling ‘feminist social research’ – a transdisciplinary space of theoretical and empirical inquiry into the contemporary and historical sphere of the social – rapidly expanded through the 1970s and 1980s, its development soon became ineluctably enmeshed with the deconstructive, post-structuralist questioning of modernist social science and the turn towards culture inaugurated by writers such as Roland Barthes (1972), Clifford Geertz (1975), Jacques Derrida (1976), Marshall Sahlins (1976), Raymond Williams (1977) and, perhaps most significantly, Michel Foucault (1967, 1970, 1972, 1973). Over the past 30 years, across much of the critically orientated social sciences there has been a fundamental epistemological reorientation, from an emphasis on explanation and causation to a focus on practices of interpretation, in which culture is placed centre stage, and social arrangements, events, material artefacts, belief systems, and research data about all of these, are treated as texts. A new emphasis on the entanglement of power and knowledge, the problematisation of the relationship between the researcher and the researched, and the fundamentally political issue of representation, of speaking for others, provoked a new self-reflexivity within disciplines and amongst individual researchers. In this context, Stuart Hall and the Birmingham School (e.g. Hall and Jefferson, 1976; Hall et al., 1978) initiated the new field of cultural studies, drawing on, but also transcending, its roots in Marxist theory and sociology. Alongside the expansion of cultural studies, across the Anglophone academy feminist, lesbian and gay, queer, post-colonial and critical race scholarship has proliferated, both forming the new ‘interdisciplines’ that cross the boundaries between the social sciences and the humanities, and impacting – to a greater or lesser extent – upon the traditional core disciplines of the social sciences. In each of these new areas, the study of culture has been seen as inextricably bound up with the analysis of the social, and the possibility of social explanation has been placed in question. A body of cultural theory that explores social, political, economic and psychic life, and their spatial and historical dimensions, through the lens of culture, has grown out of the new interdisciplines and across the transformed disciplines of the humanities and social sciences. As a result, the distinctive focus and task of critical social research has become profoundly uncertain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adorno, T. and Horkheimer, M. (1979) The Dialectic of Enlightenment, London: Verso.
Barthes, R. (1972) Mythologies, London: Paladin.
Bauman, Z. (2003) Liquid Love: on the Frailty of Human Bonds, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Benjamin, J. (1988) The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism and the Problem of Domination, New York: Pantheon Books.
Benhabib, S. (1992) Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, Cambridge: Polity.
Benhabib, S. (1996) Democracy and Difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Berg, A.J. (2009) ‘Silence and Articulation – Whiteness, Racialization and Feminist Memory Work’, NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 16(4): 213–227.
Bohman, J. (2010) ‘Critical Theory’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ spr2010/entries/critical-theory/ [accessed 15 February 2011].
Calhoun, C. (2000) ‘Social Theory and the Public Sphere’, in B.S. Turner (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (1997) The Power of Identity, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Cornell, D. (2008) Moral Images of Freedom: a Future for Critical Theory, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Derrida, J. (1976)[1967] Of Grammatology, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univer sity Press.
Dreyfus, H. and S. Dreyfus (1986) Mind over Machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer (New York: Free Press).
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it can Succeed Again, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foucault, M. (1967) The History of Sexuality: Volume 1, London: Penguin Books.
Foucault, M. (1970) The Order of Things, London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge, London; Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1973) The Birth of the Clinic, London; Tavistock.
Fraser, N. (1989) Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory, Cambridge: Polity.
Fraser, N. (1997) Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition, New York, London: Routledge.
Fraser, N. (2008) Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World, Cambridge: Polity.
Friedeburg, L.V. (n.d) History of the Institute of Social Research, http://www.ifs.uni-frankfurt.de/english/history.htm [accessed 15 February 2011].
Geertz, C. (1975) [1973] The Interpretation of Cultures, London: Hutchinson.
Gibson-Graham, J.K. (1996) The End of Capitalism (as we knew it): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy, Oxford: Blackwell.
Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1973) Theory and Practice, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Hall, S. and Jefferson T. (eds.) (1976) Resistance Through Rituals, London: Hutchinson.
Hall, S. et al. (1978) Policing the Crisis, London: Macmillan.
Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York: Routledge.
Harootunian, H. (2007) ‘Remembering the Historical Present’, Critical Inquiry, 33(3): 471–494.
Haug, F. et al. (1987) Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory, London: Verso.
Haug, F. (n.d) ‘Memory-work as a Method of Social Science Research: A Detailed Rendering of Memory-Work Method’, http://www.friggahaug.inkrit. de/documents/memorywork-researchguidei7.pdf [accessed 21 May 2011].
Hernes, H.M. (1987) Welfare State and Political Power: Essays in State Feminism, Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
Horkheimer, M. (1982) Critical Theory, New York: Seabury Press.
Latour, B. (2004) ‘Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern’, Critical Inquiry, 30: 225–248.
Marcuse, H. (1969) An Essay on Liberation, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Marx, K. (1888) ‘Theses on Feuerbach’, in L.S. Feuer (ed.) (1984) Marx and Engels: Basic Writings on Politics and Philosophy, Aylesbury, UK: Fontana.
Pringle, R. and S. Watson (1992) ‘“Women’s interests” and the post-structuralist state’, in M. Barrett and A. Phillips (eds) Destabilizing Theory: contemporary feminist debates Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ricœur, P. (1970) Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Trans. Denis Savage, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rogoff, I. (2003) ‘From Criticism to Critique to Criticality’, http://eipcp.net/ transversal/0806/rogoff1/en [accessed 15 February 2011].
Sahlins, M. (1976) Culture and Practical Reason, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sedgwick, E.K. (2003) ‘Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading, or, You’re So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Essay is About You’, in Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Weeks, J. (1998) ‘The Sexual Citizen Theory’, Culture and Society, 15(3–4): 35–52. Weeks, J. (2007) The World We Have Won: The Remaking of Erotic and Intimate Life, London and New York: Routledge.
Weeks, J. (2007) The World We Have Won: The Remaking of Erotic and Intimate Life, London and New York: Routledge.
Wengraf, T. (2007) Guide to BNIM Biographic-Narrative Interpretative Method: Interviewing for Life-Histories, Lived Situations and Ongoing Personal Experiencing, Version 7.11e.
Williams, R. (1977) Marxism and Literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Sasha Roseneil
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roseneil, S. (2012). Doing Feminist Social Research after the Cultural Turn: Research with Practical Intention. In: Roseneil, S., Frosh, S. (eds) Social Research after the Cultural Turn. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360839_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360839_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31733-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-36083-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)