Abstract
What are the possibilities for social research after the ‘cultural turn’? How have the epistemological and political contexts of social research changed? Can we still define a distinct sphere of ‘the social’ to research? What ontologies and methodologies might critical social research employ after the cultural turn?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bourdieu, P. (1999) The Logic of Practice, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bullock, A. and Trombley, S. (eds.) (1999) The Fontana/Norton Dictionary of Modern Thought, Third Edition, London: Fontana/Norton.
Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.) (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research, London: Sage.
Firth, R. (1951) Elements of Social Organization, London: Watts and Co.
Hall, S. (1990) ‘Cultural Identity and Diaspora’, in J. Rutherford (ed.), Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Harding, S. (1993) ‘Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: “What is Strong Objectivity?” ’, in L. Alcoff and E. Potter (eds), Feminist Epistemologies, New York: Routledge.
May, T. (1998) ‘Reflexivity in the Age of Reconstructive Social Science’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(1): 7–24.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Sasha Roseneil and Stephen Frosh
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roseneil, S., Frosh, S. (2012). Social Research after the Cultural Turn: A (Self-)Critical Introduction. In: Roseneil, S., Frosh, S. (eds) Social Research after the Cultural Turn. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360839_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360839_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31733-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-36083-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)