Abstract
The discussion on ‘European cosmopolitanism’, which has been intensifying for some time now, seems to reproduce a fundamental conceptual problem. Whenever authors start out from a specific answer, in the sense of a solution — in this case, European cosmopolitanism — it leaves them with only one main task. As this task is simply to justify their basic assumption, it is not too surprising when this justification becomes purely normative; or, more problematically, when normative and analytical elements are mixed. All too often this approach considerably limits discussion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beck, U. (2000) What Is Globalization? Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. and E. Grande (2007) Cosmopolitan Europe, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Benhabib, S. (2006) Another Cosmopolitanism, New York: Oxford University Press.
Delanty, G. and C. Rumford (2005) Rethinking Europe: Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization, London: Routledge.
Fine, R. (2006) ‘Cosmopolitanism and Violence’, British Journal of Sociology 57 (1): 49–67.
Fine, R. and V. Boon (2007) ‘Introduction: Cosmopolitanism: Between Past and Future’, European Journal of Social Theory 10 (1): 5–16.
Habermas, J. (2009) Europe: The Faltering Project, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Holton, R. (2002) ‘Cosmopolitanism or Cosmopolitanisms? The Universal Races Congress of 1911’, Global Networks 2 (2): 153–70.
Honneth, A. (1987) The Struggle for Recognition, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Krossa, A. S. (2009) ‘Conceptualizing European Society on Non-Normative Grounds: Logics of Sociation, Glocalization and Conflict’, European Journal of Social Theory 12 (2): 249–64.
Krossa, A. S. (2011) ‘Eine Diskussion des Konzepts “gehegter Konflikt”’, in A. Langenohl and J. Schraten (eds), (Un)Gleichzeitigkeiten: Die demokratische Frage im 21, Jahrhundert: Metropolis.
Krossa, A. S. (2012a) ‘Eurocentrism’, in G. Ritzer (ed.), Encyclopedia of Globalization, Oxford: Blackwell.
Krossa, A. S. (2012b) Conceptualising Society: Europe as a Problem, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kumar, K. (2008) ‘The Question of European Identity: Europe in the American Mirror’, European Journal of Social Theory 11 (1): 87–105.
Latour, B. (2004) ‘Whose Cosmos, Which Cosmopolitics?’, Common Knowledge 10 (3): 450–62.
Nava, M. (2002) ‘Cosmopolitan Modernity: Everyday Imaginaries and the Register of Difference’, Theory, Culture and Society 19 (1–2): 81–99.
Robbins, B. (1998) ‘Comparative Cosmopolitanisms’, in P. Cheah and B. Robbins (eds), Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Robertson, R. (1992) Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture, London: Sage.
Roche, M. (2010) Exploring the Sociology of Europe, London: Sage.
Ross, J. (2005) ‘The Ghosts of the Chocolate Summit’, in D. Levy, M. Pensky and J. Torpey (eds), Old Europe, New Europe, Core Europe: Transatlantic Relations after the Iraq War, London: Verso.
Smith, W. (2007) ‘Cosmopolitan Citizenship: Virtue, Irony and Worldliness’, European Journal of Social Theory 10 (1): 37–52.
Sznaider, N. (2007) ‘Hannah Arendt’s Jewish Cosmopolitanism: Between the Universal and the Particular’, European Journal of Social Theory 10 (1): 112–22.
Tomlinson, J. (1999) Globalization and Culture, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Anne Sophie Krossa
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krossa, A.S. (2012). Why ‘European Cosmopolitanism’?. In: Robertson, R., Krossa, A.S. (eds) European Cosmopolitanism in Question. Europe in a Global Context. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360280_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360280_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-30263-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-36028-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)