Abstract
Everyday passers-by, regular residents, as well as municipal officers may have a mental image and a set of discourses about the multilingualism of a linguistic landscape (LL) of their city which can be quite different from what scholars working with LL would ‘see’ and think. That is why we undertook our investigations about the perception of the linguistic landscape and wanted to shed light on how discourses on this perception can be instructive about social issues in the lives of urban residents. We hypothesized that the presence of a minority community in a town will engender discussion about the identification of this community (both from the inside and the outside) and about the perceived value of this community, its language, its customs or its culture. In order to trigger discussion and discourse data to analyse, we used people’s perception about LL as our departure point. Hence, elicited and naturally occurring oral and written data were collected on people’s opinions about local LL in four multilingual European locations with important minority communities. The analysis which follows documents our attempt at providing another snapshot of how LL and minority languages (and their speakers) shape each other.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Backhaus, P. (2007) Linguistic Landscapes. A Comparative Study of Urban Multilingualism in Tokyo. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Boudreau, A. and L. Dubois (2005) ‘L’affichage à Moncton. Mirroir ou masque?’ Revue de l’université de Moncton, 36, 1, 185–217.
Bowen Committee (1972) Bilingual Traffic Signs. Arwyddion Ffyrdd Dwyieithog. Report of the Committee of Inquiry under the Chairmanship of Roderic Bowen. Cardiff: HMSO.
Cenoz, J. and D. Gorter (2006) ‘Linguistic landscape and minority languages’. In D. Gorter (ed.) Linguistic Landscape. A New Approach to Multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Dal Negro, S. (2009) ‘Local policy modeling the linguistic landscape’. In E. Shohamy and D. Gorter (eds) Linguistic Landscape. Expanding the Scenery. London: Routledge.
Fischer, F. (2003) Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gee, J. P. (2005) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. Milton Park: Routledge.
Gorter, D. (2006) ‘Introduction: The study of the linguistic landscape as a new approach to multilingualism’. In D. Gorter (ed.) Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to Multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Hajer, M. A. (1993) ‘Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Britain’. In F. Fischer and J. Forester (eds) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
Huebner, T. (2006) ‘Bangkok’s linguistic landscapes: Environmental print, code-mixing and language change’. In D. Gorter (ed.) Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to Multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Kübler, D. (2001) ‘Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalitions framework: An application to Swiss drug policy’. Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 4, 623–41.
Malinowski, D. (2009) ‘Authorship in the linguistic landscape: A multiperformative view’. In E. Shohamy and D. Gorter (eds) Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. London: Routledge.
Sabatier, P. A. and H. C. Jenkins-Smith (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A. and H. C. Jenkins-Smith (1999) ‘The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment’. In P. A. Sabatier (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A. and C. M. Weible (2007) ‘The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications’. In P. A. Sabatier (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process (2nd edition). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Scollon, R. and S. Scollon (2003) Discourses in places: Language in the material world. London: Routledge.
Shohamy, E. and S. Waksman (2009) ‘Linguistic landscape as an ecological arena: Modalities, meanings, negotiations, education’. In E. Shohamy and D. Gorter (eds), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. London: Routledge.
Sloboda, M. (2009a) ‘State ideology and linguistic landscape: A comparative analysis of (Post)Communist Belarus, Czech Republic and Slovakia’. In E. Shohamy and D. Gorter (eds) Linguistic Landscape; Expanding the Scenery. London: Routledge.
Sloboda, M. (2009b) Language Management in the Linguistic Landscapes of Multilingual Cities. Linee WP6a research report.
Statut Istarske županije [Statute of the Istrian County] (2009) Služene novine Istarske županije 10/2009, available at http://www.istra-istria.hr/index.php?id=63, (accessed on 20 September 2011).
Van Dijk, T. A. (2003) ‘Critical discourse analysis’. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. Ehernberger Hamilton (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden: Blackwell.
Weible, C. M. (2007) ‘An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California marine protected area policy’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 95–117.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Eszter Szabó Gilinger, Marián Sloboda, Lucija Šimičić and Dick Vigers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gilinger, E.S., Sloboda, M., Šimičić, L., Vigers, D. (2012). Discourse Coalitions For and Against Minority Languages on Signs: Linguistic Landscape as a Social Issue. In: Gorter, D., Marten, H.F., Van Mensel, L. (eds) Minority Languages in the Linguistic Landscape. Palgrave Studies in Minority Languages and Communities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360235_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360235_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32322-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-36023-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)