Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Britain and the World ((BAW))

  • 79 Accesses

Abstract

The diplomatic career of William James ‘Jack’ Garnett was relatively unusual in the number of his postings. Besides brief periods spent in the Parliamentary and Contraband Departments of the wartime Foreign Office, between 1902 and 1919, he served successively in Constantinople, Peking, Bucharest, St Petersburg, Tehran, Sofia, Athens, Tangier and Buenos Aires. He thus lived and worked in four of the world’s continents at a time when the tectonics of international affairs shifted significantly. He was at the Foreign Office when the strains of war placed unprecedented demands on it, and his career as a whole spanned a period in which it, as well as the Diplomatic and Consular Services, underwent reform on several occasions. Garnett’s nomination as an unpaid attaché in the Diplomatic Service was confirmed just as Britain signed an alliance with Japan, thus ending decades of relative diplomatic isolation. The period of his diplomatic career was one in which German military and naval power increased substantively and its ambitions erupted in August 1914. It was a period in which the old empires of Europe, including the Ottoman Empire, with its expansive Asiatic dominions, as well as the Austro-Hungarian and Russian Empires, dissolved. Then, too, nascent Chinese and Japanese imperialism took shape, and both those powers joined Russia in seeking greater influence in Central and East Asia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, for example, B. J. C. McKercher, Esme Howard: a Diplomatic Biography (Cambridge, CUP, 1989);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Hamilton, Bertie of Thame: Edwardian Ambassador (Woodbridge, Suffolk, The Royal Historical Society/The Boydell Press, 1990);

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Gillies, Radical Diplomat: the Life of Archibald Clark Kerr, Lord Inverchapel, 1882–1951 (London, Tauris, 1999);

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. J. Protheroe, Searching for Security in a New Europe: the Diplomatic Career of Sir George Russell Clerk (London, Routledge, 2006);

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. R. Berridge, Gerald Fitzmaurice (1865–1939) Chief Dragoman of the British Embassy in Turkey (Leiden/Boston, Martinus Nijhoff, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sir Frederick Ponsonby considered Lady Feo, wife of Sir Francis Bertie, ambassador at Paris (1905–18), to be ‘quite impossible as Ambassadress’; Hamilton, Bertie of Thame, p. 10. So, too, the ‘unpresentable’ wife was a means of maintaining the integrity of the diplomatic elite, when amalgamation of the diplomatic and consular services was proposed. Z. Steiner, ‘Elitism and Foreign Policy: The Foreign Office Before the Great War’, in B. J. C. McKercher and C. J. Lowe (eds), Shadow and Substance in British Foreign Policy 1895–1939 (Edmonton, The University of Alberta Press, 1984), p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sir William Wiseman to Eric Drummond, quoted in K. Burke, Britain, America and the Sinews of War 1914–1918 (London, Allen and Unwin, 1985), p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. J. Glenny, ‘The Trade Commissioner and Commercial Diplomatic Services’, JPA, 2, 3 (1924), 282–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, generally, D. C. M. Platt, Finance, Trade and Politics in British Foreign Policy, 1815–1914 (Oxford, Clarendon, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. M. Grove to Garnett, 29 Nov. 1909, DDQ 9/21/2. In fact, Sir Arthur Nicolson, then ambassador at St Petersburg, had also blocked the idea; Nicolson to Grey, 15 Mar. 1909, FO 369/239/6195/11815. Some efforts had been made to improve commercial openings, though with mixed success: K. Neilson, Britain and the Last Tsar: British Policy and Russia, 1894–1917 (Oxford, Clarendon, 1995), pp. 105–6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Hughes, Diplomacy before the Russian Revolution: Britain, Russia and the Old Diplomacy, 1894–1917 (Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2000), pp. 107–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. David Kelly, on the other hand, who shared Garnett’s despair at the Treasury’s penny-pinching attitude regarding consular appointments, ‘found it utterly impossible to take an interest in anything I was doing’, when attached to the Consular Department of the Foreign Office in 1921. Sir D. Kelly, The Ruling Few or The Human Background to Diplomacy (London, Hollis and Carter, 1952), pp. 137, 139. Regarding dissatisfaction in the Levant Service before 1914,

    Google Scholar 

  13. see G. Berridge, British Diplomacy in Turkey, 1583 to the Present: A Study in the Evolution of the Resident Embassy (Leiden/Boston, Martinus Nijhoff, 2009), pp. 93–7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. The Swedes were frequently held responsible, as they were for transshipping to Germany. See, Marsden, ‘The Blockade’, in F. H. Hinsley (ed.), British Foreign Policy Under Sir Edward Grey (London, Cambridge University Press, 1977), pp. 497–9, 507–10. In the case of Argentina, the Italians were also blamed.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See M. C. Siney, ‘The Allied Blockade Committee and the Inter-Allied Trade Committees: the Machinery of Economic Warfare, 1917–1918’, in K. Bourne and D. C. Watt (eds), Studies in International History (London, Longmans, 1967), pp. 330–44.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. A. Jones, The British Diplomatic Service, 1815–1914 (Gerrards Cross, Colin Smythe, 1983), pp. 196–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The argument has been made that the Foreign Office considered senior appointments carefully; T. G. Otte, ‘“Not Proficient in Table-Thumping”: Sir Ernest Satow at Peking, 1900–1906’, D&S, 13, 2(2002), 191.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See, for example, C. Gandy, ‘Fez and Frock-Coat: A Very English Consul in Ottoman Turkey’, AA, 15, 1 (1984), 68.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Jenkins and A. Sloman, With Respect Ambassador, An Inquiry into the Foreign Office (London, BBC, 1985), pp. 33–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See J. Fisher, ‘Keeping “the Old Flag Flying”: The British community in Morocco and the British Morocco Merchants Association, 1914–24’, HR, 83, 222 (2010), 719–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R. C. Newton, German Buenos Aires: 1900–1933: Social Change and Cultural Crisis (Austin/London, University of Texas Press, 1977), pp. 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 John Fisher

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fisher, J. (2012). Introduction. In: British Diplomacy and the Descent into Chaos. Britain and the World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230359819_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230359819_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34588-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-35981-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics