Abstract
In 1943 it became increasingly clear that the time to re-plot the coordinates of colonial social policy was drawing closer. Encouragement and inspiration for the authors of new policy came from many sources. In addition, as post-war planning by the Allies progressed, the ILO was forced to confront some existential questions. The Office recognized the increasing need to get actively involved in international planning and thus to relinquish, to some extent, its traditionally cautious approach. A new world was being created and the ILO would have to move into areas that had previously been out of its reach if it was to make a place for itself. Wilfrid Benson was given the task of drawing up one of the documents described by the British historian Mark Mazower as “blueprints for the golden age”,1 the outlines upon which a just post-war order would be based.2 Benson’s plan for a “people’s peace in the colonies” was a document which, in its universalistic language and calls for active development, represented an almost total break with the Organization’s “native labour” work in the period before the war. Its adoption at the Philadelphia Conference, where the ILO proclaimed the idea of universal social rights and convincingly claimed for itself a role in structuring the post-war order, was a milestone in the treatment of colonial social policy on an international level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
M. Mazower: The dark continent: Europe’s twentieth century (London, Allen Lane, 1998), p. 267.
See A. Alcock: History of the International Labour Organisation (London, Macmillan, 1970), pp. 157 ff.
M. Stewart: The ILO and Great Britain 1919–1969: The story of fifty years (London, HMSO, 1969), pp. 23–30.
W. Benson: “A people’s peace in the colonies”, in International Labour Review (1943), Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 141–68.
G.A. Johnston: The International Labour Organisation: Its work for social and economic progress (London, Europa, 1970), p. 235.
V.-Y. Ghebali: The International Labour Organization: A case study on the evolution of UN specialized agencies (Dordrecht, Nijhoff, 1989), p. 62.
Charles Taussig, adviser to the US Government delegation, ILC, 26th Session (1944), RoP, p. 227.
See G. Mollin: Die USA und der Kolonialismus. Amerika als Partner und Nachfolger der belgischen Macht in A frika 1939–1965 (Berlin, Akademie Verlag, 1996), pp. 31–135.
R. Holland: European decolonization: An introductory survey (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 1981), pp. 55 ff.
On the circumstances surrounding the establishment and the short life of the WFTU in its united form, see A. Carew: “A false dawn: The World Federation of Trade Unions (1945–1949)”, in idem et al. (eds): The International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (Berne, Peter Lang, 2000), pp. 165–87.
On the intellectual basis which united the WFTU, see V. Silverman: Imagining internationalism in American and British labor 1939–1949 (Urbana/Chicago, Ill., University of Illinois Press, 2000).
Copyright information
© 2012 International Labour Organization
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maul, D. (2012). A Charter for the Colonies: The Colonies at the Philadelphia Conference, 1944. In: Human Rights, Development and Decolonization. International Labour Organization (ILO) Century Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230358638_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230358638_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34471-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-35863-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)