Skip to main content

“Be Here to See This”: Haneke’s Intrusive Images

  • Chapter
Screening the Unwatchable
  • 181 Accesses

Abstract

In the age of globalization and frenzied visuality, the battle over the possession of history, no less than that over representation itself, often takes the form of a contest of images. When rendered invisible, odious historical truths can sometimes be elided and buried. The unearthing and re-visualization of deliberately suppressed events is obviously a key task for historical scholarship, especially within postcolonial studies, but occasionally this subject is broached also by artists, writers, and filmmakers. In this chapter, I shall examine how Haneke re-imagines and problematizes a long forgotten scandal in French postwar history—the massacre of Algerians in Paris in 1961—and how he brings his viewers face to face with the enduring ramifications of this dark chapter in the narrative of the nation. My focus will be on the ways in which Caché implicates the viewer in the events described by the film and on the withholding, or even obliteration, of cinematic pleasure that Haneke’s games entail. The filmmaker’s iconoclastic project, I argue, revisits the figure of intrusion so prevalent in some of his earlier films like Funny Games (1997) and Code Unknown (2000) and aligns his work with a counter-cinema tradition whose antecedents include the likes of Buñuel, Godard, and Mulvey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Sergei Eisenstein, “The Problem of the Materialist Approach to Form,” The Eisenstein Reader, ed. Richard Taylor, London: BFI, 1998; Theodor W. Adorno and Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment [1944], New York: Continuum, 1972; and Debord, La société du spectacle.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. J. Clark, The Sight of Death: An Experiment in Art Writing, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006, 43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steven Shaviro, The Cinematic Body, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ipek A. Celik, “‘I Wanted You to Be Present’: Guilt and the History of Violence in Michael Haneke’s Caché,” Cinema Journal, 50.1 (2010), 61.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oliver C. Speck, Funny Frames: The Filmic Concepts of Michael Haneke, New York: Continuum, 2010, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. J. T. Mitchell, “Showing Seeing: A Critique of Visual Culture,” Journal of Visual Culture 1.2 (2002), 165–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nick James, “The Films of 2006,” Sight and Sound 17: 1 (2007), 32.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, London: Verso, 1991, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Christopher Sharrett, Review of Caché, Cineaste 31:1 (2005), 61.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson Jeffers, The Double Axe and Other Poems [1948], foreword William Everson, afterword Bill Hotchkiss, New York: Liveright, 1977, xxi.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For a longer discussion of the permutations of empathy in Caché, see Brian Gibson, “Bearing Witness: The Dardenne Brothers’ and Michael Haneke’s Implication of the Viewer,” Cineaction 70 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. An idea first developed in Gilles Deleuze’s two mid-80s film books Cinema 1: The Movement-Image (1983) and Cinema 2: The Time-Image (1985), the notion of filmic thought has subsequently been explored in an ever growing selection of scholarly works. It most generally involves the presupposition that films are capable of doing philosophy and should be seen as a kind of manifestation of thought in action, graspable but ultimately unparaphraseable by language. See for instance Eric Alliez, “Midday, Midnight: The Emergence of Cine-thinking,” trans. Patricia Dailey, The Brain is the Screen: Deleuze and the Philosophy of Cinema, ed. Gregory Flaxman, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000, 293–303; Stephen Mulhall, On Film, London: Routledge, 2002; and Daniel Frampton, Filmosophy, London: Wallflower Press, 2006. See also Deleuze Cinema 1 and Cinema 2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richard Porton, “Collective Guilt and Individual Responsibility: An Interview with Michael Haneke,” Cineaste 31:1 (2005): 50. For an analysis of the ways in which Haneke’s oeuvre relates to “the distractions of visual culture,” see Kevin Wynter, “Excesses of Millennial Capitalism, Excesses of Violence: Several Critical Fragments Regarding the Cinema of Michael Haneke,” Cineaction 70 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Asbjørn Grønstad

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grønstad, A. (2012). “Be Here to See This”: Haneke’s Intrusive Images. In: Screening the Unwatchable. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355859_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics