Abstract
The question of whether a state of affairs is desirable because it is desired or whether it is desired because it desirable only makes sense when this can be discussed in a somewhat objective way. This means that reasons can be advanced that support the claim that the properties of a state of affairs that is to be brought about (or to be avoided) are desirable (or not desirable). A connected discussion refers to the motivation to act. Rational choice theory endorses the classical argument that reasons require motivation and motivation requires a desire (though the desire may be located at the background). This argument is contained in the concept of a motivated reason. I have defended the relevance of Nagel’s concept of a motivated desire. Also the defence of this concept requires that arguments can be exchanged and that an autonomous decision is not simply equated with desiring what you want.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Copyright information
© 2012 Jan de Jonge
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Jonge, J. (2012). Rational and Moral Action. In: Rethinking Rational Choice Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355545_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355545_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32553-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-35554-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)