Skip to main content

Comparing the Europeanization of Multiple Inequalities in Southern Europe: A Discursive-Institutionalist Analysis

  • Chapter
The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies

Part of the book series: Gender and Politics Series ((GAP))

Abstract

The EU and the member states have progressively developed a legal and institutional framework for dealing with inequality, and in the past decade they have intensified their political treatment of multiple inequalities (Van der Vleuten, 2007; Bell, 2002). In this chapter we explore the Europeanization of the political treatment of inequality in three Southern European Countries (SECs), arguing that, although EU influence has been crucial in introducing the political treatment of inequalities in Italy, Spain, and Portugal, the different ways in which Europe ‘hits home’ depend on the specific domestic context, which influences the type of equality policy implementation, social learning, and political usage of the EU that occurs in these countries. We thus comparatively study the ways in which inequalities of gender, race or ethnicity, and sexual orientation have been institutionally treated, in terms of both legislation and institutional bodies, in the three Southern countries’ responses to the EU equality directives (see also Buzogány’s Chapter 7). To further understand differences in the Europeanization of the political treatment of inequalities in our sample, we will also analyse discursive factors such as resonant frames and references to the EU in policy documents.

We thank members of the QUING research team, especially researchers who have worked with us on the cases of Italy, Spain, Portugal, and the EU: Alba Alonso (acknowledgments also for her feedback on the Portuguese case), Elena Del Giorgio (whom we also acknowledge for conducting the Italian interviews), Ana F. de Vega, Maxime Forest, Valentina Longo, Silvia López, Inês Nunes, Amaia Pérez, Elin Peterson, Raquel Platero, Lise Rolandsen. We wish to thank people who have kindly participated in our interviews. Finally, Emanuela Lombardo thanks the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation for supporting her research through the 2006 Ramón y Cajal Programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Alonso, A. (2009a) ‘Institutionalising Intersectionality in Portugal: Towards a Multiple Approach?’ Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions Wks 14, Lisbon, 14–19 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, A., with input from A. F. De Vega (2009b) QUING LARG Comparative Country Studies: Portugal (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. (2008) ‘The Implementation of European Anti-discrimination Directives: Converging Towards a Common Model?’ The Political Quarterly, 79: 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. (2002) Anti-discrimination Law and the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bencini, C. and S. Cerretelli (2007) ENAR Shadow Report 2007: Racism in Italy, http://www.enar-eu.org/, date accessed 29 October 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchorst, A. et al. (forthcoming) ‘Institutionalising Intersectionality in the Scandinavian Countries’, in A. Krizsan, H. Skjeie, and J. Squires (eds) Institutionalising Intersectionality? Comparative Analyses (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel T. and T. Risse (2003) ‘Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe’, in K. Featherstone and C. Radaelli (eds) The Politics of Europeanization (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 57–80.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bustelo, M. (2009) ‘Spain: Intersectionality Faces the Strong Gender Norm’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11, 4: 530–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustelo, M. and C. Ortbals (2007) ‘The Evolution of Spanish State Feminism: A Fragmented Landscape’, in J. Outshoorn and J. Kantola (eds) Changing State Feminism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 201–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrò, A. and R. Grasso (2004) Dal Movimento Femminista al Femminismo Diffuso. Storie e Percorsi a Milano dagli Anni 60 agli Anni 80 (Milan: Franco Angeli).

    Google Scholar 

  • Celis, K. et al. (forthcoming) ‘Institutionalising Intersectionality in The Netherlands and Belgium’, in A. Krizsan, H. Skjeie, and J. Squires (eds) Institutionalising Intersectionality? Comparative Analyses (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. W. (1989) ‘Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139: 139–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Giorgio, E., with inputs from A. de Mendoza and M. Forest (2009) QUING LARG Comparative Country Studies: Italy (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • F. de Vega, A., L. Rolandsen, and E. Lombardo (2009) QUING LARG Comparative Country Study: European Union (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • F. de Vega, A. and L. Rolandsen, with input and supervision from E. Lombardo (2008) QUING Research Report: LARG–Country study: European Union. General Gender Equality Policies (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree M. M. (2009) ‘Inequality, Intersectionality and the Politics of Discourse: Framing Feminist Alliances’ in E. Lombardo, P. Meier, and M. Verloo (eds) The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending and Policymaking (London: Routledge), pp. 86–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest, M. et al. (2009) QUING LARG Comparative Country Studies: Spain (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • González M. J., T. Jurado, and M. Naldini eds (2000) Gender Inequalities in Southern Europe. Women, Work and Welfare in the 1990s (London-Portland: Frank Cass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guadagnini, M. and A. Donà (2007) ‘Women’s Policy Machinery in Italy between European Pressure and Domestic Constrains’, in J. Outshoorn and J. Kantola (eds) Changing State Feminism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 164–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, A. (2007) ‘When Multiplication doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm’, Perspectives on Politics, 5: 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krizsan, A. and M. Verloo (2007) D10 Sampling Guidelines Manual: QUING Report (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krizsan, A., and V. Zentai (forthcoming) ‘Institutionalizing Intersectionality in Countries of Central and European Europe’, in A. Krizsan, H. Skjeie, and J. Squires (eds) Institutionalising Intersectionality? Comparative Analyses (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebert, U. ed. (2003) Gendering Europeanization (Brussels: Peter Lang).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, E. (2004) La Europeización de la Política Española de Igualdad de Género (Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo E. and M. Sangiuliano (2009) ‘Gender and Employment in the Italian Policy Debates 1995–2007: The Construction of “Non Employed” Gendered Subjects’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 32, 6: 445–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, E. and M. Verloo (2009) ‘Institutionalising Intersectionality in the European Union? Policy Developments and Contestations’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11, 4: 478–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, E. and E. Del Giorgio (forthcoming) ‘EU Antidiscrimination Policy and its Unintended Domestic Consequences: the Institutionalization of Multiple Equalities in Italy’, Women’s Studies International Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longo, V., with input from E. Lombardo (2008) QUING Research Report: LARG–Country study Italy. General Gender Equality Policies (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • López, S., with input from E. Peterson and M. Bustelo (2008) QUING Research Report: LARG–Country Study Spain: General Gender Equality Policies (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, K. (2007) Europeanizing Responses to Labour Market Challenges in Greece, Ireland and Portugal: The Importance of Consultative and Incorporative Policymaking, Dissertation, Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, I., with supervision of M. Bustelo (2008) QUING Research Report. LARG–Country Study Portugal. General Gender Equality Policies (Vienna: IWM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Outshoorn, J. and J. Kantola eds (2007) Changing State Feminism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraceno, C. (1994) ‘The Ambivalent Familism of the Italian Welfare State’, Social Politics, 1, Spring: 60–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. (2010) ‘Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth “New Institutionalism” ’, European Political Science Review, 2, 1: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. and C. Radaelli (2004) ‘Policy Change and Discourse in Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Issues’, West European Politics, 27, 22: 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skjeie, H. and T. Langvasbråten (2009) ‘Intersectionality in Practice? Antidiscrimination Reforms in Norway’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11, 4: 513–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. and R. Benford (1988) ‘Ideology, Frame Resonance and Participant Mobilization’, International Social Movement Research, 1: 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, J. (2009) ‘Intersecting Inequalities: Britain’s Equality Review’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11, 4: 496–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetson, Dorothy M. and A. Mazur (1995) Comparative State Feminism (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobío, C. (2005) Madres que Trabajan: Dilemas y Estrategias (Madrid: Cátedra).

    Google Scholar 

  • Valiente, C. (1998) ‘El Feminismo de Estado en Portugal: La Creación de la Comissão para a Igualdade e para os Direitos das Mulheres y su Relación con el Movimiento de Mujeres’, Seminario Movimento Feminista em Portugal, Lisbon, 5–6 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der V leuten, A. (2007) The Price of Gender Equality (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woll, C. and S. Jacquot (2010) ‘Using Europe: Strategic Action in Multi-level Politics’, Comparative European Politics, 8, 1: 110–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Emanuela Lombardo and María Bustelo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lombardo, E., Bustelo, M. (2012). Comparing the Europeanization of Multiple Inequalities in Southern Europe: A Discursive-Institutionalist Analysis. In: Lombardo, E., Forest, M. (eds) The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies. Gender and Politics Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355378_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics