Skip to main content

Energy Security and Climate Security under Conditions of the Anthropocene

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Energy, Climate and the Environment Series ((ECE))

Abstract

This chapter sets out to revisit energy security and climate security in light of the Anthropocene. We draw on the notion of the Anthropocene in order to ask what it means for conceptions of security that the environment has become an effect of human agency. The passage quoted above, which is a statement of the British Government in the 2007 United Nation Security Council debate on climate change and security, provides an ideal starting point for our considerations. The dilemma that stems from the costly downsides of the prolonged pursuit of energy security could not be expressed more plainly: the term ‘security’ appears inappropriate in ‘energy security’ as pursuing it threatens its very aim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrahamsen, R. and M.C. Williams (2009), ‘Security beyond the state: Global security assemblages in international politics’, International Political Sociology, 3(1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamsen, R. and M.C. Williams (2011), Security Beyond the State: Private Security in International Politics (Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amineh, M.P. and H. Houweling (2007), ‘Global energy security and its geopolitical impediments – The case of the Caspian region’, Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 6(1): 365–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antilla, L. (2005), ‘Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change’, Global Environmental Change Part A, 15(4): 338–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asdal, K. (2008), ‘Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing’, Geoforum, 39(1): 123–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.L. (1962), How to Do Things with Words (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003), ‘Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3): 801–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. (2001a), The Meaning of Environmental Security: Environmental Politics and Policy in the New Security Era (New York: Zed Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. (2001b), ‘Security and climate change’, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Working Paper, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, A. (2001), Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society (London-New York: Athlone Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J. (1999), Environment and Social Theory (London-New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1995), Life in Fragments: Essays in Postmodern Morality (Oxford-Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1995), Ecological Enlightenment: Essays on the Politics of the Risk Society (Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2002), Ecological politics in an age of risk (Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, N. and S. Hinchliffe (2008), ‘Reconstituting natures: Articulating other modes of living together’, Geoforum, 39(1): 83–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgerson, S.G. (2008), ‘Arctic meltdown: The economic and security implications of global warming’, Foreign Affairs, 87: 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, R. (2009). ‘Canada is “Arctic superpower”: Cannon’, National Post, 28 June [http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=s1741776; accessed: 03 December 2010].

  • Bradshaw, M.J. (2009), ‘The geopolitics of global energy security’, Geography Compass, 3(5): 1920–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, H.G. (2009), Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts (Berlin: Springer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, H.G. and G. Zundel (2008), Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century (Berlin-New York: Springer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, G. (2008), ‘Global production networks and the extractive sector: Governing resource-based development’, Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3): 389–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broder, J.M. (2010a), ‘China and India join climate accord’, New York Times, 10 March [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/10/world/10climate.html; accessed: 03 December 2010].

  • Broder, J.M. (2010b), ‘Senate gets a climate and energy bill, modified by a gulf spill that still grows’, New York Times, 12 May [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/13/science/

  • earth/13climate.html?ref = us; accessed: 03 December 2010].

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.P.A. and H.G. Huntington (2008), ‘Energy security and climate change protection: Complementarity or tradeoff?’, Energy Policy, 36(9): 3510–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzoska, M. (2009), ‘The securitization of climate change and the power of conceptions of security’, Security and Peace, 27(3): 137–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., O. Wæver and J.D. Wilde (1998), Security: A New Framework for Analysis (Boulder: Lynne Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, M. (2009), Who Owns the Arctic? Understanding Sovereignty Disputes in the North (Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre).

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J. and L. Glover (2005), ‘Ellul and the weather’, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 25(1): 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çaliskan, K. and M. Callon (2009), ‘Economization, part 1: Shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization’, Economy and Society, 38(3): 369–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çali¸skan, K. and M. Callon (2010), ‘Economization, part 2: A research programme for the study of markets’, Economy and Society, 39(1): 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1986), ‘Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’, in J. Law (ed.): Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. and B. Latour (1992), ‘Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so’, in K. Knorr-Cetina and A.V. Cicourel (eds): Advances in Social Theory and Methodology – Towards an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies (London-Henley: Routledge/Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. and J. Law (1982), ‘On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment’, Social Studies of Science, 12(4): 615–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. and J. Law (1997), ‘After the individual in society: Lessons on collectivity from science, technology and society’, The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 22(2): 165–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) (2007), National Security and the Threat of Climate Change (Alexandria: CNA Corporation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.C. and R.E. Munn (1986), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2007), The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It (Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J.D. (2002), Climate Crash: Abrupt Climate Change and What It Means for Our Future (Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, P.J. and E.F. Stoermer (2000), ‘The Anthropocene’, Global Change Newsletter, 41: 17–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, S. (2002), Environmental Security (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, S. (2009), Security and Environmental Change (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. (2006), A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity (London-New York: Continuum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeritt, D. (2001), ‘The construction of global warming and the politics of science’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(2): 307–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deudney, D. (1999), ‘Environmental security. A critique’, in D. Deudney and R.A. Matthew (eds): SUNY Series in International Environmental Policy and Theory (Albany: State University of New York Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutch, J., A. Lauvergeon and W. Prawiraatmadja (2007), Energy Security and Climate Change (Washington, Paris, Tokyo: The Trilateral Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, B.M. (2008), The Great Warming: Climate Change and the Rise and Fall of Civilizations (New York: Bloomsbury Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, R. (2008), ‘The environmental security debate and its significance for climate change’, The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, 43(3): 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, T. (2001), ‘Critical realism and political ecology’, in A. Stainer and G. Lopez (eds): After Postmodernism: Critical Realism? (London: Athlone Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammon, E. (2010), ‘Nature as adversary: The rise of modern economic conceptions of nature’, Economy and Society, 39(2): 218–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, H., P.E. Steinberg, J. Tasch, S.J. Fabiano, and R. Shields (2010), ‘Contested sovereignty in a changing Arctic’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(4): 992–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU) (2007), World in Transition – Climate Change as a Security Risk (London: Earthscan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2009), The Politics of Climate Change (Cambridge-Malden: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C.A.S. and K.A. Klitgaard (2006), ‘The need for a new, biophysical-based paradigm in economics for the second half of the age of oil’, International Journal of Transdisciplinary Research, 1(1): 4–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J.E. (2005), ‘A slippery slope: How much global warming constitutes “dangerous anthropogenic interference”?’, Climatic Change, 68(3): 269–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, L. (2010), ‘Vladimir Putin hugs polar bear on Arctic trip’, The Guardian, 29 April [http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/29/vladimir-putin-polar-beararctic; accessed: 03 December 2010].

  • Hirsch, R.L. (1987), ‘Impending United States energy crisis’, Science, 235(4795): 1467–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M.M., C.M. Bitz, and B. Tremblay (2006), ‘Future abrupt reductions in the summer Arctic sea ice’, Geophysical Research Letters, 33(23): L23503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. (2009), Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. (2010), ‘Cosmopolitan climates: Hybridity, foresight and meaning’, Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2/3): 277–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, J. (2006), The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration, and Asylum in the EU (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, L. (2010), ‘China prepares for an ice-free Arctic’, SIPRI Insights on Peace and Security, 2010(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (2005), ‘In the democracies of DNA: Ontological uncertainty and political order in three states’, New Genetics and Society, 24(2): 139–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokinen, P. (1997), ‘Ulrich Beck: Ecological politics in an age of risk’ [review], Acta Sociologica, 40(1): 114–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judkins, G., M. Smith and E. Keys (2008), ‘Determinism within human-environment research and the rediscovery of environmental causation’, The Geographical Journal, 174: 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M., T.L. Karl and Y. Said (2007), Oil wars (London: Pluto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, M.T. (2004), Blood and Oil: The Dangers and Consequences of America’s Growing Petroleum Dependency (New York: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt & Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, K. (2003), ‘Environmental security’ [book review], Environmental Change & Security Project Report (9): 111–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristoffersen, B. and S. Young (2010), ‘Geographies of security and statehood in Norway’s “Battle of the North” ’, Geoforum, 41(4): 577–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labban, M. (2008), Space, Oil, and Capital (Abingdon-New York: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, M. (2005), Security and Climate Change – International Relations and the Limits of Realism (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993), We Have Never Been Modern (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004), Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (ed.) (1991), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (London-New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1992), ‘Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity’, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 5(4): 379–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2008), ‘On sociology and STS’, Sociological Review, 56(4): 623–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., and A. Mol (2008), ‘Globalisation in practice: On the politics of boiling pigswill’, Geoforum, 39(1): 133–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., and M. Callon (1988), ‘Engineering and sociology in a military aircraft project: A network analysis of technological change’, Social Problems, 35(3): 284–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. (2009), ‘Managing the interlocking climate and resource challenges’, International Affairs, 85(6): 1101–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefèvre, N. (2007), Energy Security and Climate Policy: Assessing Interactions (Paris: OECD/IEA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leichenko, R.M. and K.L. O’Brien (2008), Environmental Change and Globalization: Double Exposures (Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, T.M., H. Held, E. Kriegler, J.W. Hall, W. Lucht, S. Rahmstorf, et al. (2008), ‘Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(6): 1786–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D.L. and D. Egan (1998), ‘Capital contests: National and transnational channels of corporate influence on the climate change negotiations’, Politics and Society, 26(3): 337–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liotta, P.H. (2005), ‘Through the looking glass: Creeping vulnerabilities and the reordering of security’, Security Dialogue, 36(1): 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litfin, K. (2003), ‘Towards an integral perspective on world politics: Secularism, sovereignty and the challenge of global ecology’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 32(1): 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco, J. (1998), ‘Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science’, Science, 279(5350): 491–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubeck, P.M., M.J. Watts and R. Lipschutz (2007), International Policy Report – Convergent Interests: US Energy Security and the “Securing” of Nigerian Democracy (Washington: Center for International Policy).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, A. and D. Tänzler (2009), Regional Security Implications of Climate Change – A Synopsis (Berlin: Adelphi Report Conducted for DG External Relations of the European Commission under a contract for the German Ministry for the Environment, Nature Protection and Nuclear Safety).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquina Barrio, A. (2008), Energy Security: Visions from Asia and Europe (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, G.P. (1874), The Earth as Modified by Human Action (New York: Scribner, Armstrong & Co).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martello, M.L. (2008), ‘Arctic indigenous peoples as representations and representatives of climate change’, Social Studies of Science, 38(3): 351–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, M. (forthcoming), ‘Chaotic climate change and security’, in International Political Sociology’ (Paper presented at the SGIR Conference Stockholm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcab, R.M., and K.S. Bailey (2007), ‘Latin America and the debate over environmental protection and national security’, DISAM Journal, 29(4): 18–34 (December).

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeary, P. (2010), ‘The Arctic: China opens a new strategic front’, World Politics Review, 19 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, J.R. (2009), ‘The international system, great powers, and environmental change since 1900’, in H.G. Brauch and Berghof-Stiftung für Konfliktforschung (eds): Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts (Berlin: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, C. and S. MacSearraigh (2007), ‘Corruption in the petroleum sector’, in J.E. Campos and S. Pradhan (eds): The Many Faces of Corruption: Tracking Vulnerabilities at the Sector Level (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriman, P. (2009), ‘Automobility and the geographies of the car’, Geography Compass, 3(2): 586–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, L. (2007), ‘The black box: Inside Iraq’s oil machine’, Harper’s Magazine, 81–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (1998), ‘Ontological politics. A word and some questions’, Sociological Review, 46(S): 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, D. and J.A. Russell (2009), Energy Security and Global Politics: The Militarization of Resource Management (London-New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, M.E. (2009), ‘Cohabitating in the globalised world: Peter Sloterdijk’s global foams and Bruno Latour’s cosmopolitics’, Environment and Planning: Society and Space, 27(1): 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obama, B. (2010), ‘Obama’s speech on energy security and offshore drilling’, March 2010 [http://www.cfr.org/publication/21787/obamas_speech_on_energy_security_and_offshore_drilling_march_2010.html; accessed: 09 May 2010].

  • Overpeck, J.T. and J.E. Cole (2006), ‘Abrupt change in Earth’s climate system’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, F. (2006), The Last Generation. How Nature Will Take Her Revenge for ClimateChange (London: Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peluso, N.L. and M. Watts (2001), Violent Environments (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (2001), The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston: Beacon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Risbey, J.S. (2008), ‘The new climate discourse: Alarmist or alarming?’, Global Environmental Change, 18(1): 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. and P. Miller (1992), ‘Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government’, The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2): 173–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothfeld, M. (2010), ‘Schwarzenegger reverses course on off-shore drilling’, Los Angeles Times, 3 May [http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/05/schwarzenegger-reverses-course-on-off-shore-drilling.html; accessed: 03 December 2010].

  • Sample, I. (2005), ‘Warming hits “tipping point” ’, Guardian, 11 August [http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2005/aug/11/science.climatechange1; accessed: 03 December 2010].

  • Schouten, P. (2010), ‘Security as controversy: Privatizing security inside global security assemblages’ (Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Conference).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, P. (2011), ‘Political topographies of private security in Sub-Saharan Africa’, in T. Dietz, K. Havnevik, M. Kaag and T. Oestigaard (eds): African Engagements – Africa Negotiating an Emerging Multipolar World (Leiden: Brill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P. and D. Randall (2003), An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and Its Implications for United States National Security. A report Commissioned by the US Defense Department (Washington: Global Business Network).

    Google Scholar 

  • ScienceDaily (2010), ‘Climate “tipping points” may arrive without warning, says top forecaster’, Science Daily, 10 February [http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100209191445.htm; accessed: 03 December 2010].

  • Searle, J.R. (1965), ‘What is a speech act?’, in M. Black (ed.): Philosophy in America (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S. and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007), Climate Change 2007 – The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen,W.L. (2004), Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure (Berlin-New York: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, M. (2005), Naming Security – Constructing Identity: ‘Mayan Women’ in Guatemala on the Eve of ‘Peace’ (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1999), ‘The Westfailure system’, Review of International Studies, 25(3): 345–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.J. and F.H. Buttel (1992), ‘How do we know we have global environmental problems? Science and the globalization of environmental discourse’, Geoforum, 23(3): 405–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The White House (2010), ‘Remarks by the President to the Nation on the BP Oil Spill’, 15 June [http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-nation-bpoil-spill; accessed: 30 June 2010].

  • Trombetta, M.J. (2008), ‘Environmental security and climate change: Analysing the discourse’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21(4): 585–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A.L. (2005), Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turton, H. and L. Barreto (2006), ‘Long-term security of energy supply and climate change’, Energy Policy, 34(15): 2232–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom Mission to the United Nations (2007), Energy, Security and Climate – Security Council Open Debate: UK Concept Paper [http://gc.nautilus.org/Nautilus/australia/reframing/cc-security/sec-council; accessed: 03 December 2010].

  • Urry, J. (2007), Mobilities (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrastro, F. and Sarah Ladislaw, S. (2007), ‘Providing energy security in an interdependent world’, The Washington Quarterly, 30(4): 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. (1995), ‘Securitization and desecuritization’, in R.D. Lipschutz (ed.): On Security (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. and J.E. Overland (2009), ‘A sea ice free summer Arctic within 30 years?’ Geophysical Research Letters, 36(7): L07502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M. (2009), ‘Crude politics: Life and death on the Nigerian oil fields’ (University of Berkeley, Department of Geography Working Paper, 25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yergin, D. (2006), ‘Ensuring energy security’, Foreign Affairs, 85(2): 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweig, D. and J. Bi (2005), ‘China’s global hunt for energy’, Foreign Affairs, 84(5): 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zysk, K. (2010), ‘Russia’s Arctic strategy: Ambitions and constraints’, Joint Force Quarterly, 57: 104–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Maximilian Mayer and Peer Schouten

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayer, M., Schouten, P. (2012). Energy Security and Climate Security under Conditions of the Anthropocene. In: Anceschi, L., Symons, J. (eds) Energy Security in the Era of Climate Change. Energy, Climate and the Environment Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230355361_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics