Skip to main content

John Stuart Mill on Justice

  • Chapter
Mill on Justice

Part of the book series: Philosophers in Depth ((PID))

  • 245 Accesses

Abstract

John Stuart Mill defended utilitarianism; indeed, he was its leading defender in the Victorian era. Mill was also the advocate of a radical reform in British politics and society, and his proposals were all rooted in the Principle of Utility as he understood it. For the utilitarian, all other moral rules were subsidiary to the Principle of Utility. This includes the principles of justice. But this giving priority to utility was challenged by those who defended the primacy of justice, and there are those who continue so to challenge Mill’s account of morality and of justice. This chapter aims to give an exposition of Mill’s views on these issues, and to offer, partially at least, a defense of those views, or at least to show that they are not so wildly short of the truth as they are presented as being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Audi, Robert (2004) The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy ([1789] 1970) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, J. Burns and H.L.A. Hart (eds) (London: Athlone Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, Roger (2007) ‘Intuitionism and Disagreement,’ in Rationality and the Good: Critical Essays on the Ethics and Epistemology of Robert Audi, M. Timmons, J. Greco, and A.R. Mele (eds) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner, W. (1998) ‘Mill’s Utilitarianism,’ in The Cambridge Companion to John Stuart Mill, John Skorupski (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner, W. (2009) ‘Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy,’ Mill, W. Donner and R. Fumerton (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, William (1973) Ethics, 2nd edn (Englewood, Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumerton, R. (2009) ‘Mill’s Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology,’ Mill, W. Donner and R. Fumerton (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Railton, Peter (1997) ‘How Thinking about Character and Utilitarianism Might Lead to Rethinking the Character of Utilitarianism,’ in Mill’s Utilitarianism: Critical Essays, David Lyons (ed.) (Lanham, Maryland: Rowan and Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, J.M. (ed.) (1969) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill: Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society, Vol. X (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, J.M. (ed.) (1972) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill: The Later Letters, Vol. X I V (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W.D. (1930) The Right and the Good (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, William (1837) ‘Preface,’ in Dissertation on the Progress of Ethical Philosophy during the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, 2nd edn, James Mackintosh (Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, William (1845) The Elements of Morality and Polity (New York: Harper and Brothers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, William (1862) Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Deighton, Bell & Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F. (1982) ‘Mill’s Proof that Happiness Is the Criterion of Morality,’ Journal of Business Ethics 1, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F. (1983) ‘Mill’s “Proof” of Utility and the Composition of Causes,’ Journal of Business Ethics 2, 135–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F. (2007) ‘John Stuart Mill,’ The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, G.N. Zalta (ed.) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill/, date first published Thursday January 3, 2002, substantive revision Tuesday July 10, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F. (2008) ‘The Logic of John Stuart Mill,’ Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 4: British Logic in the Nineteenth Century, Dov Gabbay and John Woods (eds) (Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F. (forthcoming) ‘Mill: Logic and Metaphysics,’ Routledge Companion to Nineteenth Century Philosophy, Dean Moyar (ed.) (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Fred Wilson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, F. (2012). John Stuart Mill on Justice. In: Kahn, L. (eds) Mill on Justice. Philosophers in Depth. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230354975_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics