Advertisement

Globalization and Social Inequality in Asia

  • Habibul Haque Khondker
Part of the Frontiers of Globalization Series book series (FOG)

Abstract

Plutarch’s insight on social inequality is valid today as scholars point to the puzzle of historical endurance of the problem of poverty as well as the risks associated with it for social stability. The quote Marx uses in his address to the National Labor Union of the United States after the Civil War has an eerie contemporary ring to it, and can be read as a description of the present United States as well as the rest of the world. Marx highlights the dynamic aspect of poverty. Although the immiserization thesis has been much criticized, treating the world as a single society, the rising trends in income inequality force one to reevaluate Marx’s thesis. Is pauperism increasing faster than population in the contemporary world?

Keywords

Income Inequality Saudi Arabia Poverty Line Social Inequality Poverty Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chotikapanich, Duangkamon and RaoPrasada D.S. (1998): ‘Inequality in Asia 1975–1990: A Decomposition Analysis’. Asia Pacific Journal of Economics and Business, 2 (1): 63–78.Google Scholar
  2. Collier, Paul (2007): The Bottom Billion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dollar, David and Kraay, Aart (2002): ‘Growth is for the Poor’. Journal of Economic Growth, 7: 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Firebaugh, Glenn and Brian, Gosling (2004): ‘Accounting for the Recent Decline in Global Income Inequality’. American Journal of Sociology, 110 (2): 283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ghosh, Jayati (2010): ‘Poverty Reduction in China and India: Policy Implications of Recent Trends’. DESA Working Paper No. 92, UN Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  6. Hauhart, Robert (2003): ‘The Davis - Moore Theory of Stratification: The Life Course of a Socially Constructed Classic’. The American Sociologist, 34 (4): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jomo, Kwama S. (no date): ‘Unequal Development and Globalization’. Available at: (www.jomoks.org, accessed on March 16, 2011).Google Scholar
  8. Krishna, Anirudh (2010): One Illness Away: Why People Become Poor and How They Escape Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuznets, Simon (1955): ‘Economic Growth and Income Inequality’. American Economic Review, 45: 1–28.Google Scholar
  10. Kuznets, Simon (1963): ‘Quantitative Aspects of the economic Growth of Nations: VIII. Distribution of Income by Size’. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 11 (2): 1–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marx, Karl (1973): ‘Address to the National Labor Union of the United States’. Marx and Engels, Selected Works, Vol. 2 Moscow: Progress Publishers: 156–7.Google Scholar
  12. Milanovic, Branko (2002): ‘True World Income Distribution, 1988 and 1993: First Calculations Based on Household Surveys Alone’. Economic Journal, 112 (476): 51–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Milanovic, Branko (2005): Worlds Apart: Global and International Inequality, 1950–2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Milanovic, Branko (2010): The Haves and the Have-nots. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Moran, Timothy P. (2005): ‘Kuznets’s Inverted U - Curve Hypothesis: The Rise, Demise and Continued Relevance of a Socioeconomic Law’. Sociological Forum, 20 (1): 209–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Myrdal, Gunnar (1968): Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  17. Ravallion, Martin (1995): ‘Growth and Poverty: Evidence for Developing Countries in the 1980s’. Economics Letters, 48: 411–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ravallion, Martin (2007): ‘Inequality is Bad for the Poor’. Inequality and Poverty Re-Examined (ed. by Stephen Jenkins and John Micklewright). Oxford: Oxford University Press: 37–61.Google Scholar
  19. Ravi, C. (2009): ‘Impact of Globalization and Recession on Social and Economic Inequalities in India’, paper for Conference on The Impact of the Global Economic Situation on Poverty and Sustainable Development in Asia and the Pacific. Hanoi, 28–30 September.Google Scholar
  20. Robison, Richard and David S.G. Goodman (1996): The New Rich in Asia. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Rohwer, Jim (1995): Asia Rising. Singapore: B H Asia.Google Scholar
  22. Sala-i-Martin, Xavier (2002): ‘The Disturbing “Rise” of World Income Inequality’. NBER Working Paper No. 8905, May National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Sen, Amartya (1999): Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
  24. Sen, Amartya (1992): Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Sengupta, Arjun and Kannan Kappadath P. et al. (2008): ‘India’s Common People: Who Are They, How Many Are They and How Do They Live?’ Economic & Political Weekly, March 15, 2008.Google Scholar
  26. Therborn, Göran (2006): Inequalities of the World. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  27. Thornhill, John (2008): ‘Income Inequality Seen as the Great Divide’. Financial Times, May 19, 2008.Google Scholar
  28. The World Bank, (2011) Migration and Remittance Factbook 2011 (Second edition) (http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTLAC/Resources/Factbook2011Ebook.pdf) .
  29. The World Bank (2002): Globalization, Growth, and Poverty. World Bank and Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Habibul Haque Khondker 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Habibul Haque Khondker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations