Advertisement

The Persistence of Sociocultures and Inequality in Contemporary Southeast Asia

  • Vincent Houben
  • Boike Rehbein
Part of the Frontiers of Globalization Series book series (FOG)

Abstract

Research on inequality often neglects history and social structures. In this chapter, we argue that we can understand inequality adequately only if we trace the historical development of social structures. New classes appear, old ones disappear, new social categories evolve and transform the entire system of classification, while many of the components of social reality that emerged historically persist at least partially in contemporary societies. This is one of the few points Marx (1974) and Weber (1978) agreed upon. Some have forgotten this, because the historical method is associated with nineteenth-century evolutionism and the grand narratives of a Eurocentric history, finding its fulfillment in Euro-American modernity. This type of narrative still resonates in grand Eurocentric theories. Most empirical research, especially on the global South, finds no place for such theories and therefore tends to discard historical approaches altogether.

Keywords

Middle Class Gini Coefficient Socioeconomic Inequality Global Capitalism Colonial Power 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah (1967): Vita activa. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
  2. Blussé, Leonard (1986): Strange Company. Chinese Settlers, Mestizo Women and the Dutch in VOC Batavia. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, Pierre (1984): Distinction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  4. Broek, J.O.M. (1957): ‘On the Use of Netherlands Indies Statistics’. Far Eastern Quarterly 10–3: 277–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans, Grant (1990): Lao Peasants underSocialism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Evans, Grant (1998): The Politics of Ritual and Remembrance. Laos since 1975. Chiang Mai: Silkworm.Google Scholar
  7. Frank, André Gunder (1998): ReOrient. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Furnivall, John S. (1939): Netherlands India. A Study of Plural Economy. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Geertz, Clifford (1965): The Social History of an Indonesian Town. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  10. Geissler, Rainer (1996): Die Sozialstruktur Deutschlands. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerke, Solvay (2000): ‘Global Lifestyles under Local Conditions: the New Indonesian Middle Class’. Consumption in Asia. Lifestyles and Identities (ed. by Chua Beng-Huat). London and New York: Routlege: 135–58.Google Scholar
  12. Gunn, Geoffrey C. (1990): Rebellion in Laos. Peasant and Politics in a Colonial Backwater. Boulder, CO, San Francisco and Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hanks, Lucien (1972): Rice and Man. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
  14. Hartmann, Michael (2007): Eliten und Macht in Europa. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  15. Healy, Andrew J., Somchai Jitsuchon and Yos Vajaragupta (2003): Spatially Disaggregated Estimates of Poverty and Inequality in Thailand. Bangkok: World Bank Working Paper.Google Scholar
  16. Higham, Charles (1989): The Archaeology of Mainland Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Houben, Vincent (2009): ‘Boundaries of Race. Representations of Indisch in Colonial Indonesia Revisited’. Empires and Boundaries. Rethinking Race, Class and Gender in Colonial Settings (ed. by Harald Fischer-Tiné and Susanne Gehrmann). New York and London: Routledge: 66–85.Google Scholar
  18. Izikowitz, Karl Gustav (2001; 1951): Lamet. Hill Peasants of French Indochina. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
  19. Jacobs, Norman (1971): Modernization without Development. Thailand as an Asian Case Study. New York, Washington and London: Praeger.Google Scholar
  20. Ladwig, Patrice (2008): ‘Between Cultural Preservation and This-Worldly Commitment: Modernization, Social Activism and the Lao Buddhist Sangha’. Recherches nouvelles sur le Laos (ed. by Yves Goudineau and Michel Lorrillard). Paris: EFEO: 465–90.Google Scholar
  21. Leach, Edmund R. (1970; third edition): Political Systems of Highland Burma. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  22. Liaw, Yock Fang (1976): Undang-undang Melaka, the Laws of Melaka. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  23. Marx, Karl (1974): Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
  24. Moertono, Soemarsaid (1968): State and Statecraft in Old Java. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Pholsena, Vatthana (2006): Post-War Laos. Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
  26. Potter, Jack M. (1976): Thai Peasant Social Structure. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pye, Oliver (2010): ‘Transnationales Prekariat? Migration in Südostasien’. Die Grenzen Asiens zwischen Globalisierung und staatlicher Fragmentierung (ed. by Conrad Schetter, Stefan Conermann and Bernd Kuzmits). Berlin: EB-Verlag: 265–80.Google Scholar
  28. Raben, Remco (1996): Batavia and Colombo. The Ethnic and Spatial Order of two Colonial Cities 1600–1800. Leiden: unpubl. PhD thesis.Google Scholar
  29. Raendchen, Jana and Oliver Raendchen (1998): ‘Present State, Problems and Purpose of baan-müang Studies’. Tai Culture, 3 (2): 5–11.Google Scholar
  30. Reid, Anthony (1993): Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450–1680. Vol. 2. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rehbein, Boike (2007): Globalization, Culture, and Society in Laos. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Rehbein, Boike (2010): ‘Critical Theory after the Rise of the Global South’. Transcience, 2: 1–17 (www.transcience-journal.org).Google Scholar
  33. Rehbein, Boike and Sisouk Sayaseng (2004): Laotische Grammatik. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
  34. Selosoemardjan (1962): Social Changes in Jogjakarta. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Simmalavong, Phout (2010): Rice Rituals and Modernization in Laos. New Delhi: Palm Leaf Books.Google Scholar
  36. Terwiel, Barend J. (1983): A History of Modern Thailand 1767–1942. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
  37. Tooker, Deborah E. (1996): ‘Putting the Mandala in its Place: A Practice-Based Approach to the Spatialization of Power on the Southeast Asian “Periphery” — The Case of the Akha’. Journal of Asian Studies, 55: 323–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vester, Michael, von Oertzen, Peter and Geiling, Heiko et al. (2001): Soziale Milieus im gesellschaftlichen Strukturwandel. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  39. Visman, J.H. (1941–2): Uerslagvan de Commissie totBestudeeringvan Staatsrechtelijke Hervormingen, 2 vols. Batavia: Landsdrukkerij.Google Scholar
  40. Walby, Sylvia (2009): Globalization & Inequalities. Complexity and Contested Modernities. London etc.: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Weber, Max (1978; sixth edition): Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, 3 vols. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  42. Wertheim, Willem F. (1956): Indonesian Society in Transition. A Study of Social Change. The Hague and Bandung: Van Hoeve.Google Scholar
  43. Wolters, Oliver W.(1982; 1999): History, Culture, and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives. Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Vincent Houben and Boike Rehbein 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent Houben
  • Boike Rehbein

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations