Abstract
Over 16 years after the genocide, Rwanda’s local communities remain severely affected by the experience of violence and attempts to overcome the legacy of this past represent a major challenge. Unsurprisingly, people who lived through the genocide against Tutsi and moderate Hutu, and through the 1990–94 war between the Habyarimana government and the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), remember their past differently with their memories being informed by their role then and their current situation. However, the Rwandan memoryscape is not simply informed by recollection, it is also shaped by forgetting. Although at present the deliberate eclipsing of particular memories, what I term chosen amnesia, may be essential for enabling community cohesion and facilitating the coexistence necessary for the intimacy of rural life in Rwanda, it also impedes the social transformation that would render ethnicity-based violence impossible, as it prevents the social cleavages that allowed the genocide to occur from being challenged.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Hayden White (1987), The Content of the Form: Narrative Theory and Historical Representation (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press), p. 24.
Lewis P. Hinchman and Sandra K. Hinchman (1997), ‘Introduction’, in Lewis P. Hinchman and Sandra K. Hinchman (eds), Memory, Identity, Community (Albany, NY: State of New York Press), p. xx.
Pierre Nora (1993), ‘General Introduction: Between Memory and History’, in Pierre Nora (ed.), Realms of Memory. Rethinking the French Past. Vol. 1. Conflict and Divisions (New York, NY: Columbia University Press), p. 11.
Maurice Halbwachs (1992), On Collective Memory (Chicago, IL, London: University of Chicago Press), p. 49.
Ernest Renan (1990), ‘What is a Nation?’, in Homi Bhabha (ed.), Nation and Narration (London: Routledge).
Stanley Cohen (2001), States of Denial. Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering (Cambridge: Polity Press), p. 138.
Stanley Cohen (1995), ‘States of Denial: Knowledge, Accountability, and the Policing of the Past’, Law and Social Inquiry, 20 (1), 15.
Vakim Volkan (1991), ‘On Chosen Trauma’, Mind and Human Interaction, 3 (13), 3–19.
Liisa Malkki (1995), Purity and Exile. Violence, Memory and National Cosmology Among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
Peter Uvin (1997), ‘Prejudice, Crisis, and Genocide in Rwanda’, African Studies Review, 40 (2), 91–115, here 91.
Jean Hatzfeld (2003), Une Saison de Machettes (Paris: Seul).
Susanne Buckley-Zistel (2005), ‘“The Truth Heals”?–Gacaca Jurisdiction and the Consolidation of Peace in Rwanda’, Die Friedens Warte, 80 (1–2), 113–29.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buckley-Zistel, S. (2012). Between Pragmatism, Coercion and Fear: Chosen Amnesia after the Rwandan Genocide. In: Assmann, A., Shortt, L. (eds) Memory and Political Change. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230354241_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230354241_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-30200-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-35424-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)