Abstract
Peace is not a universal concept that can be transposed identically between different contexts of conflict. Rather, unique forms of peace arise when the strategies, institutions and norms of international, largely liberal–democratic peacebuilding interventions collide with the everyday lives of local actors affected by conflict. At the site of each international peace intervention, an interface forms at which the everyday activities, needs, interests and experiences of local groups and the goals, norms and practices of international policy-makers/implementers overlap. Within this space, a unique range of practices, responses and agencies – including plural forms of acceptance and appropriation, resistance and the exertion of autonomy – emerges and ‘hybridizes’1 the ‘blueprints’2 for peace advanced by international actors. In the process of hybridization, actors (both locally and internationally based) reshape the norms, institutions and activities in question by means of everyday practices such as verbal interaction, organization and even overt conflict.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Roger Mac Ginty, ‘Indigenous Peace-Making versus the Liberal Peace’, Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2008, pp. 139–163.
Oliver P. Richmond and Jason Franks, Liberal Peace Transitions, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.
Audra Mitchell, Lost in Transformation: Violent Peace and Peaceful Conflict in Northern Ireland, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Audra Mitchell, ‘Peace beyond Process?’, Millennium Journal of International Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2010, pp. 641–665.
Audra Mitchell, Lost in Transformation: Peace and Radical Change in Northern Ireland, Belfast: Queen’s University of Belfast, 2009.
Oliver P. Richmond, ‘Eirinism and a Post-Liberal Peace’, Review of International Studies, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2009, pp. 557–580; Audra Mitchell, ‘Quality/Control: International Interventions and the “Everyday” ’, forthcoming.
‘Leaning to learn’ is how Kapoor puts it. Ilan Kapoor, The Post-Colonial Politics of Development, London: Routledge, 2008, p. 56.
Amity Acharya, ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism,’ International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2004, pp. 239–275.
John Keane, Global Civil Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 123.
Beatrice Pouligny, Peace Operations Seen From Below, London: Hurst, 2006.
Robin Luckham, ‘Introduction: Transforming Security and Development in an Unequal World’, IDS Bulletin, Vol. 40, No. 2, March, 2009, p. 3.
Jonathan Spencer, Anthropology, Politics and the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
James C. Scott, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Peasant Resistance, Yale University Press, 1985.
Mark Mazower, Inside Hitler’s Greece, 1941–1945, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001.
Alberto Melucci, ‘Social Movements and the Democratisation of Everyday Life’, in John Keane (ed.), Civil Society and the State, London: Verso, pp. 245–260.
Arturo Escobar, Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton University Press, 1995.
Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984, p. xi.
Michel Foucault. History of Sexuality, Vol. 3: The Care of the Self, New York: Pantheon Books, 1986.
See Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Jurgen Habermas, ‘Questions and Counter Questions’, in R. J. Bernstein (ed.), Habermas and Modernity, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985, pp. 196–197.
Andrew Linklater, The Transformation of Political Community, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1998, p. 31.
Homi Bhabha, The Location of Culture, London: Routledge, 1994, p. 232.
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’, in C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988, pp. 271–313.
Roland Bleiker, Aesthetics and World Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
Claudia Aradau and Jeff Huysmans, ‘Mobilisation and Global Democracy’, Millennium, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2009, pp. 583–604, at p. 587.
Cited in Saul Newman, ‘Connolly’s Democratic Pluralism and the Question of State Sovereignty’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 10, 2007, pp. 227–240.
David Ucko, ‘Militias, Tribes, and Insurgents: The Challenge of Political Reintergration in Iraq’, Conflict, Security and Development, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2008, pp. 341–373, at p. 365.
Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Raoul Vaneigem. Revolution of Everyday Life, London: Rebel Press, 1983.
Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, Anti-Oedipus, London: Continuum, 2008.
Charles Taylor. A Secular Age, Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2007.
Rosemary E. Shinko, ‘Agonistic Peace: A Postmodern Reading’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2008, pp. 473–491.
Julian Eckl, ‘Responsible Scholarship after Leaving the Veranda’, International Political Sociology, Vol. 2, 2008, pp. 187–190.
Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977; Scott, Weapons of the Weak.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Oliver P. Richmond and Audra Mitchell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Richmond, O.P., Mitchell, A. (2012). Introduction – Towards a Post-Liberal Peace. In: Richmond, O.P., Mitchell, A. (eds) Hybrid Forms of Peace. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230354234_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230354234_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32821-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-35423-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)