Skip to main content

Introduction – Towards a Post-Liberal Peace

Exploring Hybridity via Everyday Forms of Resistance, Agency and Autonomy

  • Chapter
Hybrid Forms of Peace

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

Abstract

Peace is not a universal concept that can be transposed identically between different contexts of conflict. Rather, unique forms of peace arise when the strategies, institutions and norms of international, largely liberal–democratic peacebuilding interventions collide with the everyday lives of local actors affected by conflict. At the site of each international peace intervention, an interface forms at which the everyday activities, needs, interests and experiences of local groups and the goals, norms and practices of international policy-makers/implementers overlap. Within this space, a unique range of practices, responses and agencies – including plural forms of acceptance and appropriation, resistance and the exertion of autonomy – emerges and ‘hybridizes’1 the ‘blueprints’2 for peace advanced by international actors. In the process of hybridization, actors (both locally and internationally based) reshape the norms, institutions and activities in question by means of everyday practices such as verbal interaction, organization and even overt conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Roger Mac Ginty, ‘Indigenous Peace-Making versus the Liberal Peace’, Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2008, pp. 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oliver P. Richmond and Jason Franks, Liberal Peace Transitions, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Audra Mitchell, Lost in Transformation: Violent Peace and Peaceful Conflict in Northern Ireland, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Audra Mitchell, ‘Peace beyond Process?’, Millennium Journal of International Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2010, pp. 641–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Audra Mitchell, Lost in Transformation: Peace and Radical Change in Northern Ireland, Belfast: Queen’s University of Belfast, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Oliver P. Richmond, ‘Eirinism and a Post-Liberal Peace’, Review of International Studies, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2009, pp. 557–580; Audra Mitchell, ‘Quality/Control: International Interventions and the “Everyday” ’, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ‘Leaning to learn’ is how Kapoor puts it. Ilan Kapoor, The Post-Colonial Politics of Development, London: Routledge, 2008, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Amity Acharya, ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism,’ International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2004, pp. 239–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. John Keane, Global Civil Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 123.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Beatrice Pouligny, Peace Operations Seen From Below, London: Hurst, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robin Luckham, ‘Introduction: Transforming Security and Development in an Unequal World’, IDS Bulletin, Vol. 40, No. 2, March, 2009, p. 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jonathan Spencer, Anthropology, Politics and the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  13. James C. Scott, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Peasant Resistance, Yale University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mark Mazower, Inside Hitler’s Greece, 1941–1945, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alberto Melucci, ‘Social Movements and the Democratisation of Everyday Life’, in John Keane (ed.), Civil Society and the State, London: Verso, pp. 245–260.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Arturo Escobar, Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984, p. xi.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Michel Foucault. History of Sexuality, Vol. 3: The Care of the Self, New York: Pantheon Books, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jurgen Habermas, ‘Questions and Counter Questions’, in R. J. Bernstein (ed.), Habermas and Modernity, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985, pp. 196–197.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Andrew Linklater, The Transformation of Political Community, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1998, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Homi Bhabha, The Location of Culture, London: Routledge, 1994, p. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’, in C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988, pp. 271–313.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Roland Bleiker, Aesthetics and World Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Claudia Aradau and Jeff Huysmans, ‘Mobilisation and Global Democracy’, Millennium, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2009, pp. 583–604, at p. 587.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cited in Saul Newman, ‘Connolly’s Democratic Pluralism and the Question of State Sovereignty’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 10, 2007, pp. 227–240.

    Google Scholar 

  27. David Ucko, ‘Militias, Tribes, and Insurgents: The Challenge of Political Reintergration in Iraq’, Conflict, Security and Development, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2008, pp. 341–373, at p. 365.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Raoul Vaneigem. Revolution of Everyday Life, London: Rebel Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, Anti-Oedipus, London: Continuum, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Charles Taylor. A Secular Age, Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rosemary E. Shinko, ‘Agonistic Peace: A Postmodern Reading’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2008, pp. 473–491.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Julian Eckl, ‘Responsible Scholarship after Leaving the Veranda’, International Political Sociology, Vol. 2, 2008, pp. 187–190.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977; Scott, Weapons of the Weak.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Oliver P. Richmond and Audra Mitchell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richmond, O.P., Mitchell, A. (2012). Introduction – Towards a Post-Liberal Peace. In: Richmond, O.P., Mitchell, A. (eds) Hybrid Forms of Peace. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230354234_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics