Abstract
The problem of who should be the rightful owner of a discovered treasure, and its distribution between the finder, the owner of the land on which the treasure was found and the fisc, is as ancient as it is difficult. The parable of the treasure hidden in a field (Matthew 13:44) hinted at that problem: the man who had found the treasure in the field buried it again and bought the field. Evidently, the Bible assumed that only the owner of the land where the treasure was buried had any claim to it. Some historians of law suggested a rather simple pattern that focused on two huge legal traditions. The Roman legal tradition had ruled the ancient empire. After the end of the Middle Ages, many parts of the Continent rediscovered and adopted Roman laws. Some legal historians claimed that according to this tradition a treasure belonged to the finder, or to the finder and the owner of the land on which the treasure had been discovered. The Germanic legal tradition dominated the Germanic lands of the Middle Ages, among them the Frankish Empire, as well as medieval and early modern England, where the Roman laws had little impact. Some jurists claimed that in this legal tradition all treasure troves went to the fisc. Hugo Grotius was probably the first jurist to describe this rather clear-cut dichotomy between the Roman and the Germanic legal tradition concerning treasure.
I greatly fear, my money is not safe.
(William Shakespeare: Comedy of Errors, 1589)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Hill, Treasure, pp. 49, 167;T. Mayer-Maly (1971–1998), “Schatz”, in HRG, vol. 4, pp. 1360–1364.
E. Eckstein (1910) “Das Schatz- und Fundregal und seine Entwicklung in den deutschen Rechten” Mitteilungen des österreichischen Instituts für Geschichtsforschung, XXXI, pp. 193–244, especially pp. 209–210, 227–228; Mayer-Maly, “Schatz”, pp. 1360–1361.
G. Steinwascher (1983) “Schatzglauben und Schatzgräber in Hessen-Kassel im 18. Jahrhundert” Hessisches Jahrbuch für Landesgeschichte, XXXIII, pp. 257–291, here p. 288.
J. Dillinger (2003) “Das Ewige Leben und fünfzehntausend Gulden. Schatzgräberei in Württemberg 1606–1770”, in J. Dillinger (ed.) Zauberer - Selbstmörder - Schatzsucher (Trier: Kliomedia), pp. 221–297, here pp. 222–223.
M. Ott (2002) Die Entdeckung des Altertums (Kallmünz: Lassleben), pp. 53–54.
J. J. Schoepffer (1705) De jure principis circa adespota (Rostock: Schwiegerau), pp. 31–34.
C. Besold, C. L. Dietherr and J. J. Speidel (1666) Thesaurus practicus (Nuremberg: Endterus), p. 866.
B. Carpzov (1656) Iurisprudentia forensis Romano-Saxonica (Leipzig: Ritzschius), pp. 876–880.
S. Stryk (1685) De iure principis subterraneo (Frankfurt/Oder: Coepsel), pp. 18–19.
W. von Kreittmayr (1844) Anmerkungen über den Codicem Maximilianeum Bavaricum civilem, 5 vols. (Munich: Vötter 1759, reprinted Munich: Vötter), vol. 2, p. 307;cf. Eckstein, “Schatzregal”. pp. 231–232, 238–241.
E. Coke (1793) The Reports of Sir Edward Coke, Knight, 7 vols (Dublin: Moore), vol. 7, p. 13.
Bercé, Découverte, pp. 149–153; J. Gillingham (1978) Richard the Lionheart (London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson), pp. 9–20.
A. Thomas-Latour (1852) “De l’Invention des Trésors Cachés et du Droit aux Trésors Trouvés” Revue de Législation et de Jurisprudence, XVIII, pp. 40–60; Hill, Treasure, pp. 127–158.
W. Behringer (1988) Mit dem Feuer vom Leben zum Tod. Hexengesetzgebung in Bayern (Munich: Hugendubel), pp. 172, 178–179, 188–190.
J. Sharpe (2001) Witchcraft in Early Modern England (Harlow: Longman), pp. 15–16;Thomas, Religion, pp. 292, 306.
Hulford (2006) http://www.hulford.co.uk/act1563.html, accessed 21 February 2006. For the background see N. Jones (1998) “Defining Superstitions: Treasonous Catholics and the Act against Witchcraft of 1563”, in C. Charlton (ed.) States, Sovereigns and Society in Early Modern England (New York: St. Martin’s), pp. 187–203.
C. Innes (1814–44) The Acts of the Parliaments of Scotland A.D. MCXXIV - A.D. MDCCVII (Edinburgh: Records Commission), vol. 2, p. 539.
W.F. Ryan (1999) The Bathhouse at Midnight. Magic in Russia (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press), pp. 425–426.
F. Behn (1961) Ausgrabungen und Ausgräber, 2nd edn (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer), pp. 9–13, 16–19.
B. Trigger (2006) A History of Archaeological Thought, 2nd edition (Cambridge: Cambridge UP), pp. 80–81.
Cf. H. Klinkhammer (1992), Schatzgräber, Weisheitssucher und Dämonenbeschwörer. Die motivische und thematische Rezeption des Topos der Schatzsuche in der Kunst vom 15. bis 18. Jahrhundert (Berlin: Mann), Illustrations Nr. 50, 52, 54–55, 64–66, 69, 71–73, 82.
S. Jäggi (1993) “Alraunenhändler, Schatzgräber und Schatzbeter im alten Staat Luzern des 16–18. Jahrhunderts” Der Geschichtsfreund, CXLVI, pp. 37–113, here p. 41.
H. Nielsen (2002) Guldhornsindskrifften fra Gallehus (Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag); Beard, Romance, pp. 5, 117, 124–125;Ott, Entdeckung; Dillinger, “Ewige”, pp. 228–229.
C. Kiesewetter (1978) Faust in der Geschichte und Tradition (Leipzig 1893: Spohr, reprinted Hildesheim: Olms), p. 70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Johannes Dillinger
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dillinger, J. (2012). The Treasure in Law and Early Archaeology. In: Magical Treasure Hunting in Europe and North America. Palgrave Historical Studies in Witchcraft and Magic. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230353312_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230353312_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-27945-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-35331-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)