Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developing a Contemporary Approach to Conceptualizing Employee Actions

  • Chapter
The Future of Employment Relations

Abstract

Work and employment have changed dramatically in recent decades, and it is reasonable to assume that dramatic changes will continue into the future. As the way people work changes, so must the conceptual lenses with which we examine the workplace and associated issues. Our interest in this chapter lies primarily in understanding what workers do outside the formal, consensual, and expected actions in the workplace. This chapter argues that a range of disciplines develop sound and reasonable explanations of action choices made by labour (individually, collaboratively, or collectively). Typically, critical scholars have examined resistance with consent (each with a variety of different names) as two distinct and separate avenues for employees to act in the workplace. However, it is only when the totality of action alternatives are arranged, that the collage of employee behaviour is complete. According to Edwards, Collinson, and Della Rocca (1995, p. 294) employees are likely to engage in ‘mutually embedded practice(s) of consent, devotion and resistance’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7 Developing a Contemporary Approach to Conceptualizing Employee Actions

  • Ackroyd, S., & Thompson, P. (1999). Organisational misbehaviour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Analoui, F., & Kakabadse, A. (1989). Defiance at work. Employee Relations, 11(3), 2–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderton, B., & Keily, J. (1988). Employee theft. Personnel Review, 17(5), 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anteby, M. (2003). The ‘moralities’ of poaching: manufacturing personal artefacts on the factory floor. Ethnography, 4(2), 217–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, N., & Blyton, P. (2000). High road and low road teamworking: perceptions of management rationales and organizational and human resource outcomes. Human Relations, 53(11) 1425–1458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, N., & Blyton, P. (2005). Worker responses to teamworking: exploring employee attributions of managerial motives. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(2), 238–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, P., & Taylor, P. (2000). Entrapped by the electronic panopticon? Worker resistance in the call centre. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldamus, W. (1961). Efficiency and effort: an analysis of industrial efficiency. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, C., Bain, P., & Taylor, P. (1998). ‘Bright satanic offices’: intensification, control and team Taylorism. In P. Thompson & C. Warhurst (eds), Workplaces of the future (pp. 163–183). London, Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly,38, 408–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, A. (2004). Diaries, dunnies and discipline: resistance and accommodation to monitoring in call centres. Labour and Industry, 14(3), 127–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, R. (1975). Research note: the relationship between strikes and ‘unorganized’ conflict in manufacturing industries. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 8(1), 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, D., (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behaviour: good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1079–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyerlein, M. (ed.). (2000). Work teams: past, present and future. London: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon, H. (1973). Working for Ford. Wakefield: Allen Lane and Penguin Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R., & Tripp, T. (2005). Badmouthing the company: bitter employee or concerned corporate citizen. In R. Kidwell & C. Martin (eds), Managing Organizational Deviance (pp. 97–108). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blauner, R. (1964). Alienation and freedom: the factory worker and his industry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, W. (2001). Cyberslacking business ethics and managerial economics. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(3), 225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent: changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, G. & Thompson, P. (2002). ‘We recruit attitude’: the selection and shaping of routine call centre labour. Journal of Management Studies, 39(2), 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C., Clegg, S., Hoggan, J. & Kornberger, M. (2003). The polyphonic spree: the case of the Liverpool dockers. Industrial Relations Journal, 34(4), 290–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P., & Spector, P. (1992). Relationships of work stressors with aggression, withdrawal, theft and substance use: an exploratory study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J., & Griffin, R. (Eds.). (1998). Dysfunctional behaviour in organisations: violent and deviant behaviours. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunnison, S. (1966). Wages and work allocation: a study of social relations in a garment workshop. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, M. (1948). The industrial’rate-buster’: a characterization. Applied Anthropology, 7, 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditton, J. (1976). Perks, pilferage and the fiddle: the historical structure of invisible wages. Theory and Society, 4(1), 39–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditton, J. (1977). Part-time crime: an ethnography of fiddling and pilferage. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ditton, J. (1979). Controlology: beyond the new criminology. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dohse, K., Jurgens, U. & Malsch, T. (1985). From ‘Fordism’ to ‘Toyotism’? The social organisation of the labour process in the Japanese automobile industry. Politics and Society, 14(2), 115–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, P. (1997). Sabotage in industry. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. & Scullion, H. (1982). The social organisation of industrial conflict: control and resistance in the workplace. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P., Collinson, D., & Della Rocca, G., (1995). Workplace resistance in Western Europe: a preliminary overview and a research agenda. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 1: 283–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. (1979). Contested terrain: the transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efimova, L. (2009). Passion at work: blogging practices of knowledge workers. Enschede, The Netherlands: Novay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, V. & Richards, J. (2009). Creativity, connecting and correcting: motivations and meanings of work-blogging among public service workers. In S. Bolton & M. Houlihan (Eds.), Work matters: reflections on contemporary work (pp. 250–268). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F., & Trist, E. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, P.1, McKinlay, A., Marks, A,. & Thompson, P. (2000a). ‘Flexible when it suits them’: the use and abuse of teamwork skills. In S. Proctor & F. Mueller (Eds.), Teamworking (pp. 222–243). New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, P., McKinlay, A., Marks, A., & Thompson, P. (2000b). In search of perfect people: teamwork and team players in the Scottish spirits industry. Human Relations, 53(12), 1549–1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. (1977). Industry and labour: class struggle and labour at work and monopoly capitalism. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galperin, B. (2003). Can workplace deviance be constructive? In A. Sagie, S. Stashevsky & M. Koslowsky (eds), Misbehaviour and dysfunctional attitudes in organizations (pp. 154–170). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, J. & Dobbins, A. (2001). Teamwork: a new dynamic in the pursuit of management control. Human Resource Management Journal, 11(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J., Lockwood, D., Bechhofer, F., & Platt, J. (1968). The affluent worker: industrial attitudes and behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. (1954). Patterns of industrial bureaucracy: a case study of modern factory administration. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2010). Insidious workplace behavior. London: Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. (2003). Internet abuse in the workplace: issues and concerns for employers and employment counselors. Journal of Employment Counseling, 40(2), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. (1984). Employee theft in the restaurant trade: forms of ripping off waiters at work. Deviant Behavior, 5, 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. (1983). Theft by employees. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2002). Over the edge? Subversive humor between colleagues and friends. Humor, 15(1), 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1981). Strikes (2nd edn). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurgens, U. (1991). Departures from Taylorism and Fordism: new forms of work in the automobile industry. In B. Jessop, H. Kastendiek, K. Neilson & O. Pederson (eds), The politics of flexibility: restructuring state and industry in Britain, Germany and Scandinavia (pp. 233–247). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, S., Muller-Seietz, G., Lopes, M., & e Cunha, M. (2007). Weblog-technology as a trigger to elicit passion for knowledge. Organization, 14(3), 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach, J. & Smith, D. (1993). The wisdom of teams: creating the high-performance organisation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. & Florida, R. (1988). Beyond mass production: production and the labor process in Japan. Politics and Society, 16(1), 121–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersley, B., Oxenbridge, S., Dix, G., Bewley, H., Bryson, A., & Forth, J. (2006). Inside the workplace: findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, R., & Martin, C. (eds). (2005). Managing organizational deviance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & McCabe, D. (2000). Bewitched, bothered and bewildered: the meaning and experience of teamworking for employees in an automobile company. Human Relations, 55(11), 1481–1517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & McCabe, D. (2003). Governing through teamworking: reconstituting subjectivity in a call centre. Journal of Management Studies, 40(7), 1587–1619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering culture: control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langan-Fox, J., Cooper, C., & Klimoski, R. (eds). (2008). Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: management challenges and symptoms. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lara, P., Tacoronte, D., Ding, J., & Ting, J. (2006). Do current anti-cyberloafing disciplinary practices have a replica in research findings? A study of the effects of coercive strategies on workplace internet misuse. Internet Research, 16(4), 450–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, V. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: cyberloafing neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 675–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, T. (1963). On the shop floor: two studies of workshop organisation and output. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahatanankoon, P., Anandarajan, M., & Igbaria, M. (2004). Development of a measure of personal web usage in the workplace. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(1), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangione, T.W. & Quinn, R.P. (1975). Job satisfaction, counterproductive behavior, and drug use at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(1), 114–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marra, M. (2007). Humour in workplace meetings. In R. Westwood & C. Rhodes (eds), Humour, work and organization (pp. 139–157). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mars, G. (1973). Chance, punters, and the fiddle: institutionalised pilferage in a hotel dining room. In M. Warner (ed.), The Sociology of the Workplace London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mars, G. (1974). Dock pilferage. In P. Rock & M. McIntosh (eds), Deviance and Control (pp. 109–128). London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mars, G. (1994). Cheats at work: an anthropology of workplace crime. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilisation. New York: Arno Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, E. (1949). The social problems of an industrial civilisation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. (2000). The team dream: the meaning and experience of teamworking in an automobile manufacturing company. In S. Proctor & F. Mueller (eds), Teamworking (pp. 203–221). New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, D., Borman, W., Spector, P., & Fox, S. (2002). Building and integrative model of extra role work behaviours: a comparison of counterproductive work behaviour with organizational citizenship behaviour. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10 (1/2), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward, N. Byrson, A., & Forth, J. (2000). All change at work? British employment relations 1980–1998, as portrayed by the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey Series. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, F. (1994). Teams between hierarchy and commitment: change strategies and the internal environment. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 383–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland, K. (2004). Workplace resistance in an Irish call centre. Work, Employment and Society, 18(4), 709–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, T., & Armstrong, P. (1976) Workers divided: a study of shopfloor politics. Glasgow: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. (1986). Forces of production: a social history of industrial automation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 78, 679–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. (1988). Organizational citizenship behaviour: the good soldier syndrome. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, G. (1996). Reviving resistance: the Japanese factory floor in Britain. Industrial Relations Journal, 27(2), 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence: lessons from America’s best run companies. New York: Harper and Rowe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P., Mackenzie, S., Paine, J. & Bacharach, D. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviours: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purser, R. (2000). The human relations myth unveiled: deconstructing the history and origins of work teams. In M. Beyerlein (ed.), Work teams: Past present and future (pp. 59–83). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. (1977). Coping with cupid: the formation, impact, and management of romantic relationships in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. (2008). ‘Because I need somewhere to vent’: the expression of conflict through work blogs. New Technology, Work and Employment, 23(1–2), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J., & Marks. A. (2007). Biting the hand that feeds: social identity and resistance in restaurant teams. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 2(2), 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger, F. & Dickson, W. (1939). Management and the worker: an account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, D. (1952). Quota restriction and goldbricking in a machine shop. The American Journal of Sociology, 57, 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, D. (1954). Efficiency and ‘the fix’: informal intergroup relations in a piecework machine shop. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoneboom, A. (2007). Diary of a working boy: creative resistance among anonymous workbloggers. Ethnography, 8(4), 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, G. (1998). The discipline of teams: the control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 397–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, G., & Wilkinson, B. (1992a). Empowerment or emasculation? Shopfloor surveillance in a total quality organisation. In P. Blyton & P. Turnbull (eds), Reassessing Human Resource Management (pp. 97–115). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, G., & Wilkinson, B. (1992b). Someone to watch over me: Surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process. Sociology, 26, 271–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaiken, H. (1984). Work transformed: automation and labor in the computer age. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprouse, M., Ed. (1992). Sabotage in the American workplace. San Francisco: Pressure Drop Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. (1911a). The principles of scientific management. Toronto: General Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. (1911b). Shop management. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., & Bain, P. (1999). An assembly line in the head: work and employee relations in the call centre. Industrial Relations Journal, 30(2), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., & Bain, P. (2003). ‘Subterranean worksick blues’: humour as subversion in two call centres. Organization Studies, 24(9), 1487–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (2003). Fantasy island: a labour process critique of the ‘age of surveillance’. Surveillance & Society, 1(2), 138–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, K. (2003). Leisure at work, who can resist? An investigation into workplace resistance by leisure service employees. Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(4), 442–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, K. (2004a). Union avoidance, postponement or de-unionisation? A Greenfield site case study. Proceedings from AIRAANZ Conference, Noosa, Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, K. (2004b). When the LOST found teams: a consideration of teams within the individualised call centre environment. Labour and Industry, 14(3), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, K. (2005). Electronic surveillance and cohesive teams: room for resistance in an Australian call centre? New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(1), 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, K., & McDonald, P. (2008). The influence of recruitment and teams on counter-productive behaviours: an Australian case study. International Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 13(2), 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E., Higgin, G., Murray, H., & Pollock, A. (1963). Organizational choice. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallas, S. (2003). The adventures of managerial hegemony: teamwork, ideology, and worker resistance. Social Problems, 50(2), 204–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek, D. (1997). Human resource management, cultural control and union avoidance: an Australian case study. The Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(3), 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek, D. (2002). Monitoring and surveillance in call centres: some responses from Australian workers. Labour and Industry, 12(3), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek, D., Callaghan, G. & Thompson, P. (2004). Teams without teamwork? Explaining the call centre paradox. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 25(2), 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, Y. & Weitz, E. (2004). Misbehavior in organizations: theory, research and management. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, P. (1998). The paradox of prerogative in participative organisations: the manipulation of corporate culture? Proceedings of the 12th AIRAANZ Conference, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. (2003). Sociology and work (3rd edn). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M. & Palmer, G. (1998). Evading surveillance and making time: an ethnographic view of the Japanese floor in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 36(4), 611–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. & Robins, K. (1993). ‘I’ll be watching you’: comment on Sewell and Wilkinson. Sociology, 27(2), 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, A. & Dehler, G., (2001). Paradigms, praxis and paradox in the analysis of organisation change: the generative nature of control. Proceedings from Critical Management Studies Conference, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A. (2001). Post-Fordism, gender and work. Sydney: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, A., Godfrey, G., & Marchington, M. (1997). Bouquets, brickbats and blinkers: total quality management and employee involvement in practice. Organization Studies, 18(5), 799–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (1993). Strength is ignorance; Slavery is freedom: managing culture in modern organisations. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 515–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial organisation: theory and practice. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabala, C.A. (1989). ‘Sabotage at General Motors’ Van Nuys assembly plant, 1975–83. Industrial Relations Journal, 20(1), 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: the future of work and power. New York: Basic Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Keith Townsend
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James Richards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Work, Organisation and Wellbeing, Griffith University, Australia

    Adrian Wilkinson  & Keith Townsend  & 

Copyright information

© 2011 Keith Townsend and James Richards

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Townsend, K., Richards, J. (2011). Developing a Contemporary Approach to Conceptualizing Employee Actions. In: Wilkinson, A., Townsend, K. (eds) The Future of Employment Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230349421_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation