Skip to main content

Engaged in What? So What? A Role-Based Perspective for the Future of Employee Engagement

  • Chapter
Book cover The Future of Employment Relations

Abstract

Employee engagement is a topic that has evolved considerably. As it has increased in popularity, the quest to define what it is has continued. For example, Storey, Ulrich, Welbourne & Wright (2009), in their chapter on employee engagement, discuss the various groups that provide definitions of the topic. They start out talking about the definitions proposed by various corporations (e.g. Caterpillar, Dell), then move to the approaches used by consulting firms (e.g. Corporate Leadership Council, Gallup), and next suggest a few definitions provided by academics (e.g. Kahn, 1990; Shaw, 2005). The conclusion, reached by many other authors working in the area, is that engagement describes a process or a set of outcomes versus a clear and agreed upon construct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6 Engaged in What? So What? A Role-Based Perspective for the Future of Employee Engagement

  • Carmeli, A., Ben-Hador, B,, Waldman, D. A., & Rupp, D. E. (2009). How leaders cultivate social capital and nurture employee vigor: implications for job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1553–1561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conference Board, The. (2010). Senior corporate communications management conference. November 3–5, 2010. Davidson Conference Center on the Campus of USC, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, J. (2005). Employee engagement: is it organizational commitment renamed? (Victoria University, School of Management, Working Paper Series). Melbourne: Victoria University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauenheim, E. (2009). ‘A skeptical view of engagement’. Workforce Management Online December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J. M. (2006). Employee engagement: a review of current research and its implications. (Conference Board Report Number: E-0010–06-RR). New York: The Conference Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. A. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, K. (2005, September 15). No employee left behind. Forbes Online. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2005/1003/060.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Kular, S., Gatenby, M., Rees, C., Soane, E., & Truss, K. (2008). Employee engagement: a literature review. Kingston Hill: Kingston University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehr, J. & Schwartz, T. (2003). The power of full engagement: managing energy, not time, is the key to high performance and personal renewal, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macey, W. H., Schneider, B., Barbera, K. M., & Young, S. A. (2009). Employee engagement: tools for analysis, practice, and competitive advantage. Rolling Meadows, IL: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, D., & Clarke, N. (2010). Engaging for success: enhancing performance through employee engagement. Surrey: Department for Business Innovation and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. A., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Been there, bottled that: are state and behavioral work engagement new and useful construct ‘wines’? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryce-Jones, J. (2010, June 11). Protect your energy at work. Psychology Today. Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/happiness-work/201006/protect-your-energy-work

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson-Smith, G., & Markwick, C. (2009) Employee engagement: a review of current thinking. (IES White Paper). Brighton, UK: Institute for Employment Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, K. (2005). Employee engagement: how to build a high performance workforce, Chicago: Melcrum Publishing Limite.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and procactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J., Ulrich, D., Welbourne, T. M., & Wright, P. M. (2009). Employee engagement. In J. Storey, P. Wright, & D. Ulrich (eds) The Routledge Companion to Strategic Human Resource Management (pp. 299–315). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Theresa M. Welbourne

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Welbourne, T.M. (2011). Engaged in What? So What? A Role-Based Perspective for the Future of Employee Engagement. In: Wilkinson, A., Townsend, K. (eds) The Future of Employment Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230349421_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics