Skip to main content

High Performance Human Resources (HPHR)

  • Chapter
The Future of Employment Relations

Abstract

The phrase ‘high performance human resources’ (HPHR) is generally taken to refer to human resource management (HRM) practices that have positive effects on the performance of an enterprise, typically a business enterprise. During the past 20 years, a substantial body of research literature that apparently provides strong quantitative evidence of the positive contributions of sets or bundles of certain HRM practices to business performance has emerged.1 Whether causal, this literature developed during a period in which HRM practices ostensibly became considerably more strategically focused and considerably less operationally focused. This transition – some would say transformation – is to some extent reflected in the supplanting of the older ‘personnel management’ by the newer ‘human resource management’.2 Nevertheless, one can question whether and to what extent HPHR constitutes a new paradigm for the management of people in organizations and for the employment relationship more broadly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

High Performance Human Resources (HPHR)

  • Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: why high performance work systems pay off. Washington: Economic Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J. (1992). The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American mini-mills. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 488–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J., & Hannan, M. T. (2002). Organizational blueprints for success in high-tech start ups. California Management Review, 44, 8–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batt, R. (1999). Work organization, technology, and performance in customer service and sales. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52, 539–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B, & Huselid, M. (2009). The differentiated workforce: transforming talent into strategic impact. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B., & Huselid, M. (2006). Strategic human resource management: where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 32, 898–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, J., & Kruse, D. (2006). U.S. high performance work practices at century’s end. Industrial Relations, 45, 457–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2009). Research and theory on high performance work systems: progressing the high-involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, P., & Neumark, D. (2001). Do ‘high-performance’ work practices improve establishment-level outcomes? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54, 737–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, P. & Singh, H. (1992). Integrating Strategic Human Resources and Strategic Management. In D. Lewin, P. D. Sherer & O. S. Mitchell (eds), Research frontiers in industrial relations and human resources, 165–192. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, N. W. (1948). The union challenge to management control. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crainer, S., & Dearlove, D. (2001). Financial times handbook of management. London: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, J., & Godard, J. (2001). An industrial relations perspective on the high-performance workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 395–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, J. T., Lewin, D., & Ichniowski, C. (1989). Human resource policies and practices in American firms. Washington: Bureau of Labor-Management Relations and Cooperative Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, BLMR #137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delery, J., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 802–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop. J. T. (1998). Industrial relations theory. In D. Lewin & B. E. Kaufman (Eds.), Advances in industrial and labor relations, 8, 15–24. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, J. T. (1958). Industrial Relations Systems. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, J. T., & Weil, D. (1996). Diffusion and performance of modular production in the U.S. apparel industry. Industrial Relations, 35, 334–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. B. & Medoff, J. L. (1984). What do unions do? New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. & Friedman, R. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, A. (2008). The high-performance work systems literature in industrial relations. In P. Blyton, N. Bacon, J. Fiorito & E. Herry (eds), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations, 420–433. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, T., & Wright, P. M. (2010). Believable or biased? Overestimating the impact of HR practices on firm performance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University ILR School Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, Research Link No. 7, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J., & Woock, C. (2009). Evidence-based human resources: a Practitioner’s guide. Research Report R-1427–09-RR. New York: The Conference Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J., & Woock, C. (2008). Evidence-based HR in action: case studies. Research Report 1427–08-CS. New York: The Conference Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J. & Woock, C. (2007). Evidence-based human resources: a primer and summary of current literature. Research Report E-0015–07-RR. New York: The Conference Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard, J. (2010). What is best for workers: the implications of workplace and human resource management practices revisited. Industrial Relations, 49, 466–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard, J., & Delaney, J. T. (2000). Reflections on the ‘high performance’ paradigm’s implications for industrial relations as a field. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53, 482–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. 2001. Human resource management: when research confronts theory. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 1092–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, P. (1969). Collective bargaining and productivity: the longshore mechanization agreement. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, B. T. (2007). What do unions do for economic performance? In J. T. Bennett & B. E. Kaufman, (Eds.), What do unions do? A twenty-year perspective, 193–237. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K., & Prennushi, G. (1997). The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: a study of steel finishing lines. American Economic Review, 87, 291–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichniowski, C., Kochan, T. A., Levine, D., Olson, C., & Strauss, G. (1996). What works at work: overview and assessment. Industrial Relations, 35, 299–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, H. C., Kochan, T. A, & Weber, M. R. (1985). Assessing the effects of industrial relations and quality of work life efforts on organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 509–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, H. C., Kochan, T. A., & Gobeille, K. R. (1983). Industrial relations performance, economic performance, and QWL programs: an interplant analysis. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, B. E. (2010a). SHRM theory in the post-huselid era: why it is fundamentally misspecified. Industrial Relations, 49, 286–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, B. E. (2010b). Hired hands or human resources? Case studies of HRM policies and practices in early American industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, B. E. (2010c). The Theoretical foundation of industrial relations and its implications for labor economics and human resource management. Industrial and Labor Relations Review (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, B. E. (2001). The theory and practice of strategic hrm and participative management: antecedents in early industrial relations. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 505–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, M., Block, R., Roomkin, M., & Salsburg, S. (eds) (1987). Human resources and the performance of the firm. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T. A., Katz, H. C., & McKersie, R. B. (1986). The transformation of American industrial relations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. B. & Johnson, N. B. (1998). Business environment, high-involvement management, and firm performance in Korea. In D. Lewin and B.E. Kaufman (eds), Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 8, 67–87. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepak, D., & Snell, S. (1999). The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. (2008a). Human resources management in the 21st century. In C. Wankel (ed.), 21st century management: a reference handbook, vol. 2., 56–64. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. (2008b). Resolving conflict. In P. Blyton, N. Bacon, J. Fiorito & E. Heery (eds), The Sage handbook of industrial relations, 447–467. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin. D. (2003). Human resource management and business performance: lessons for the 21st century. In M. Effron, R. Gandossy and M. Goldsmith (eds), Human resources in the 21st century, 91–98. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. (2001). Low involvement work systems and business performance. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, 275–292. Champaign, IL. IRRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. (1999). Theoretical and empirical research on the grievance procedure and arbitration: A critical review. In A. E. Eaton & J. H. Keefe (eds), Employment dispute resolution and worker rights in the changing workplace, 137–186. Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. (1987a). Conflict resolution in the nonunion firm: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31, 465–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. (1987b). Industrial relations as a strategic variable. In M. Kleiner, R. Block, M. Roomkin and S. Salsburg (eds), Human resources and the performance of the firm, 1–42. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D., & Casoinic, D. (2009). Evidence-based human resource management: a review of its major prototypes and guiding principles. Paper presented to the 69th Annual Meeting, Academy of Management, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1, 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDuffie, J. P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 197–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. J. B., Lewin, D., & Lawler, E. E., III. (1990). Alternative pay systems, firm performance, and productivity. In A.S. Blinder (ed.), Paying for productivity, 15–83. Washington: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morishima, M. (1991). Information sharing and firm performance in Japan. Industrial Relations, 30, 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82, 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H., Jr. (1982). In search of excellence: lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive advantage through people. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Veiga, J. F. (1999). Putting People first for organizational success. Academy of Management Executive, 13, 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, A. (1977). The economics of trade unions (revised edn). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S., Gilul, T., & Brown, K. (2007). The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: implications for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 987–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. 1997. Organizational Culture and Leadership (3rd edn). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2010, April 5). Leadership Retention Literature Review. Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/SearchCenter/Pages/results.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, T., & Wood, S. (2005). The romance of human resource management and business performance, and the case for big science. Human Relations, 58, 429–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. E. (1985). From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63, 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitener. E. M. (2001). Do high commitment human resources practices affect employee commitment? Journal of Management, 27, 515–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. J., & de Menezes, L. (1998). High commitment management in the U.K.: evidence from the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey, and Employers’ Manpower and Skills Practices Survey. Human Relations, 51, 485–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. M., & Snell, S. A. (1998). Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 23, 756–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. M., Gardner, T. M., Moynihan, L. M., & Allen, M. R. (2005). The relationship between HR practices and firm performance: examining causal order. Personnel Psychology, 58, 409–446.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 David Lewin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lewin, D. (2011). High Performance Human Resources (HPHR). In: Wilkinson, A., Townsend, K. (eds) The Future of Employment Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230349421_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics