Skip to main content
Book cover

Max Stirner pp 143–164Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Max Stirner: The End of Philosophy and Political Subjectivity

  • Chapter

Abstract

Max Stirner has often been considered a Young Hegelian, or even the ‘last Hegelian’. Such a reading implies that Stirner drew the logical conclusions of Hegel’s philosophy, thereby ignoring the way his thought marks a fundamental break with the philosophical tradition as a whole. Stirner’s notions of ‘egoism’, ‘ownness’ and ‘Der Einzige’ (‘the ego’) were not philosophical concepts but, in a Foucauldian sense, tools to dismantle the subject-object dichotomy and its social and political bearings in the wake of modernity. It is argued, furthermore, that his ideas cannot be reduced to a traditional philosophy of the subject (existentialism). This chapter analyses both Stirner’s quest to ‘dissolve’ philosophy, as well as its radical implications for political theory as a whole. Stirner’s notion of Der Einzige not only questions the revolutionary subject in a strictly Marxist sense, but eventually any form of (political) subjectivity. Stirner’s radical criticism of the emancipatory claims of his contemporaries allows us to question and rethink the concepts of contemporary social and political theory, not only by criticizing the way political power is commonly conceived and by refraining from positing essentialist guarantees, but also by laying bare the problem of political subjectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. G. Penzo (2006) Die existentielle Empörung: Max Stirner zwischen Philosophie und Anarchie, (Berlin: Peter Lang);

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Copleston (2003) A History of Philosophy: 18th and 19th century German philosophy, (London: Continuum), p. 303;

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Arvon (1954) Aux sources de l’existentialisme: Max Stirner, (Paris: PUF).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. W. K. Paterson (1971) The Nihilistic Egoist Max Stirner, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  5. The existing translation is abridged: M. Stirner (1977) ‘Stirner’s Critics’, The Philosophical Forum, 8/2–3–4): 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  6. In the translation of ‘Kunst und Religion’ the first sentence on Hegel is omitted: M. Stirner, ‘Art and Religion’ in L. Stepelevich (1983) The Young Hegelians: An Anthology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). We will use our own translations and put the original quote in note.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Tomba (2005) Krise und Kritik bei Bruno Bauer: Kategorien des Politischen im nachhegelschen Denken, (Frankfurt: Peter Lang), pp. 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. J. Brazill (1970) The Young Hegelians, (New Haven: Yale University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Hook (1962) Trom Hegel to Marx, (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Moggach (2006) The New Hegelians. Politics and Philosophy in the Hegelian School, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. W. Breckman (1998) Marx, the Young Hegelians and the Origins of Radical Social Theory. Dethroning the Self, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 5–11.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Moggach (2001) ‘“Free Means Ethical”: Bruno Bauer’s Critical Idealism’, Owl of Minerva, 33/1: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Moggach (2003) The Philosophy and Politics of Bruno Bauer, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 40–46.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. G. W. F. Hegel (1986) Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag), p. 534.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. W. F. Hegel (1986) ‘Der Geist des Christentums und sein Schicksal (1798–1800)’, in Frühe Schriften, (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag), pp. 276–311.

    Google Scholar 

  16. This text remained unpublished; the most well-known statements can be found in G. W. F. Hegel (1986) Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion, (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag), pp. 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Feuerbach (1973) Das Wesen des Christentums, (Berlin: Akademie Verlag), pp. 208–211.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Bauer (1968) ‘Die Fähigkeit des heutigen Juden und Christen, frei zu werden’, in Feldzüge der reinen Kritik, ed. H. M. Sass (Frankfurt; Suhrkamp Verlag), pp. 178–180.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Marx (1970) ‘Zur Judenfrage’, Historisch-kritische Gesamtausgabe: Werke, Schriften, Briefe. Ed. Band I. (Glässhutten im Taunus: Detlev Auvermann), p. 599.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Stirner, Der Einzige und sein Eigentum, (Stuttgart: Reclam, 2000), pp. 136–139;

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Stirner, The Ego and Its Own, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 111–113;

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Tomba, ‘Von der Geschichtsphilosophie zur Politik. Strömungen des Radikalismus im Vormärz: Bruno Bauer, Max Stirner und Karl Marx’, in Freiheit, Gleichheit, Solidarität. Beiträge zur Dialektik der Demokratie, ed., Werner Goldschmidt (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2009), pp. 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  23. ‘Es gibt keine Begriffsentwicklung des Einzigen, es kann kein philosophisches System aus ihm, als aus einem ‘Prinzipe’ erbaut werden, wie aus dem Sein, dem Denken oder dem Ich; es ist vielmehr alle Begriffsentwicklung mit ihm zu Ende. Wer ihn als ein ‘Prinzip’ ansieht, der denkt ihn philosophisch oder theoretisch behandeln zu können und führt notwendigerweise nutzlose Lufthiebe gegen ihn.’ Stirner (1986) ‘Rezensenten Stirners’, in Parerga, Kritiken, Repliken, ed. Bernd Laska, (Nürnberg: LSR-Verlag), p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  24. John Henry Mackay and Ernst Barnikol suggest that Bauer and Stirner were caught up in a dispute over a joint project, probably Das entdeckte Christentum. Stirner eventually refused to collaborate with Bauer in 1843. It is however uncertain what triggered this dispute and when it started. E. Barnikol (1927) Das entdeckte Christentum im Vormärz, (Jena: Eugen Diederichs), pp. 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. Bauer (1842) Hegel’s Lehre von der Religion und Kunst von dem Standpuncte des Glaubens aus beurtheilt, (Leipzig: Wigand), p. 197; D. Moggach, Philosophy and Politics, p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  26. This probably explains why Stirner continues to criticize ‘egoism’ in another article just before Der Einzige und sein Eigentum, and claims that it is in fact opposed to ‘self-determination’. See: Stirner’s Einiges Vorläufige vom Liebesstaat (1843), pp. 123–126.

    Google Scholar 

  27. For an elaborated analysis of Stirner’s critique of Bruno Bauer, see W. De Ridder (2008) ‘Max Stirner, Hegel and the Young Hegelians’, History of European Ideas, 34/3: 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. B. Bauer (1845) ‘Charakteristik Ludwig Feuerbachs’, Wigands Vierteljahrschrift III, pp. 86–146.

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. W. F. Hegel (1986) Phänomenologie des Geistes, (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag), pp. 575–586.

    Google Scholar 

  30. H. Pepperle (1986) Die Hegeische Linke: Dokumente zu Philosophie und Politik im Deutschen Vormärz, (Frankfurt: Röderberg Verlag), pp. 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Penzo, Die existentielle Empörung; F. Copleston, A History of Philosophy; H. Arvon, Aux sources de l’existentialisme. A more recent attempt at existentialist integration can be found in Bernd Kast’s edition of Der Einzige und sein Eigentum. M. Stirner (2009) Der Einzige und sein Eigentum. Ausführlich kommentierte Studienausgabe, (München, Verlag Karl Alber), pp. 391–393.

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Deleuze & F. Guattari (1980) Mille plateaux. Capitalisme et schizophrénie, (Paris: Les Editions de Minuit), p. 304.

    Google Scholar 

  33. L. Althusser (2006) Philosophy of the Encounter. Later Writings 1978–1987 (London: Verso), p. 167–168.

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. Newman (2001) ‘Spectres of Stirner: A contemporary critic of ideology’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 6/3: 320–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Widukind De Ridder

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Ridder, W. (2011). Max Stirner: The End of Philosophy and Political Subjectivity. In: Newman, S. (eds) Max Stirner. Critical Explorations in Contemporary Political Thought Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230348929_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics