Abstract
In Chapter 3, we proposed that deontological ethics should be of primary importance in investment banking. We also identified five key questions that should inform ethical decision-making. Two of these, grounded in deontological ethics, are as follows: who are the stakeholders, and what duties are they owed? and what rights are relevant in the situation, and what bearing will they have in making a decision? The high-profile investigation of Goldman Sachs over the marketing of ABACUS, a mortgagebacked security, highlights these two questions. In particular, as the following comments suggest, a key ethical issue in investment banking is what weight should be given to duties to stakeholders relative to a firm’s rights?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2011 John N. Reynolds and Edmund Newell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reynolds, J.N., Newell, E. (2011). The Two Opposing Views of Investment Banking Ethics. In: Ethics in Investment Banking. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230348851_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230348851_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33015-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-34885-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)