Skip to main content

Inward FDI and the Size of the Market: Hosting MNCs or Promoting Domestic Companies?

  • Chapter
  • 195 Accesses

Abstract

One of the recent policy concerns in the area of development is whether globalization really helps to improve standards of living in developing countries. International organizations advocate the merit of accessing the global economy via foreign direct investment. Anti-globalization movements do not necessarily agree with this view. Those opposing globalization argue that self-interested multinational companies exploit the resources of developing countries and impair development. Thus, for the purpose of long-run economic growth, it may be better to protect domestic infant industries rather than rely on foreign capital.

This chapter is reproduced from Tomohara (2004a) after minor revisions. I gratefully acknowledge suggestions by Li Ming Dong, Harvey Gram, Joseph Harrington, Edi Karni, Ho Jin Lee, Jennifer Roff, Molly Sherlock, Katie Winder, and Alan Weinman. I also would like to thank to seminar participants at Columbia University, Cornell University, Georgia Southern University, the City University of New York, and the Johns Hopkins University for their comments. All errors are mine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aitken, B. J. and A. Harrison (1999) ‘Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela’, American Economic Review 89 (3), 605–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, B. J., A. E. Harrison and R.E. Lipsey (1996) ‘Wages and Foreign Ownership: A Comparative Study of Mexico, Venezuela, and the United States’, Journal of International Economics 40, 345–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchetta, P. and E. Wincoop (2000) ‘Does Exchange-Rate Stability Increase Trade and Welfare?’, American Economic Review 90 (5), 1093–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M. and F. Sjöholm (1999) ‘Technology Transfer and Spillovers: Does Local Participation with Multinationals Matter?’, European Economic Review 43, 915–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, B. A., R. B. Davies and K. Head (2003) ‘Estimating the Knowledge-Capital Model of the Multinational Enterprise: Comment’, American Economic Review 93 (3), 980–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, E. W. and T. A. Gresik (1996) ‘Regulation of Multinational Firms with Two Active Governments: A Common Agency Approach’, Journal of Public Economics 59 (1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, D. W. and J. M. Perloff (1994) Modern Industrial Organization ( New York: HarperCollins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. L., J. R. Markusen and K. E. Maskus (2001) ‘Estimating the Knowledge-Capital Model of the Multinational Enterprise’, American Economic Review 91, 693–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copithorne, L. W. (1971) ‘International Corporate Transfer Prices and Government Policy’, Canadian Journal of Economics 4, 324–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, L. (1985) ‘The Microeconomics of Transfer Pricing’, in A. M. Rugman and L. Eden (eds), Multinationals and Transfer Pricing ( New York: St Martin’s Press ), pp. 13–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elitzur, R. and J. Mintz (1996) ‘Transfer Pricing Rules and Corporate Tax Competition’, Journal of Public Economics 60, 401–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R. C. and G. H. Hanson (1997) ‘Foreign Direct Investment and Relative Wages: Evidence from Mexico’s Maquiladoras’, Journal of International Economics 42, 371–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. A. and D. Romer (1999) ‘Does Trade Cause Growth?’, American Economic Review 89 (3), 379–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut, M. L. and H. Ohta (1979) ‘Vertical Integrations of Successive Oligopolists’, American Economic Review 69, 137–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresik, T. A. and D. R. Nelson (1994) ‘Incentive Compatible Regulation of a Foreign-Owned Subsidiary’, Journal of International Economics 36, 309–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, M. and A. Harrison (1993) ‘Are There Positive Spillovers from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Panel Data for Morocco’, Journal of Development Economics 42 (1), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. (1996) ‘Openness and Growth: A Time-Series, Cross-country Analysis for Developing Countries’, Journal of Development Economics 48 (2), 419–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (1984) ‘A Simple Theory of Trade with Multinational Corporations’, Journal of Political Economy 92, 451–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. and P. Krugman (1985) Market Structure and Foreign Trade ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, T. (1971) ‘The Theory of the Multinational Firm: Optimal Behavior under Different Tariff and Tax Rates’, Journal of Political Economy 79 (5), 1059–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) (1997) Survey on Business of the U.S.-based Japan-affiliated Manufactures ( Tokyo: JETRO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, C. (1990) ‘Multinational Firms and Government Revenues’, Journal of Public Economics 42 (2), 135–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, A. (1994) ‘Technology, Market Characteristics, and Spillovers’, Journal of Development Economics 4, 279–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG International Tax Center (1998) KPMG Corporate Tax Rate Survey ( New York: KPMG).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. and D. Renelt (1992) ‘A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions’, American Economic Review 82 (4), 942–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. E. (2002) ‘Home and Host Country Effects on FDI’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 9293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. R. (1997) ‘Trade versus Investment Liberalization’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 6321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. R., A. J. Venables, D. Eby-Konan and K. H. Zhang (1996) ‘A Unified Treatment of Horizontal Direct Investment, Vertical Direct Investment, and the Pattern of Trade in Goods and Services’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. R. and K. E. Maskus (2002) ‘Discriminating among Alternative Theories of the Multinational Enterprise’, Review of International Economics 10 (4), 694–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002) Foreign Direct Investment for Development: Maximizing Benefits, Minimizing Costs ( Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prusa, T. J. (1990) ‘An Incentive Compatible Approach to the Transfer Pricing Problem’, Journal of International Economics 28 (1/2), 155–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, J. (1950) ‘Vertical Integration and Anti-Trust Policy’, Journal ofPolitical Economy 58, 347–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoughton, N. and E. Talmor (1994) ‘A Mechanism Design Approach to Transfer Pricing by the Multinational Firm’, European Economic Review 38 (1), 143–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomohara, A. (2004a) ‘Globalization for Development?: Inward FDI and the Size of the Market’, Southern Business Review 30, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomohara, A. (2004b) ‘Inefficiencies of Bilateral Advanced Pricing Agreements (BAPA) in Taxing Multinational Companies’, National Tax Journal 57 (4), 863–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Akinori Tomohara

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tomohara, A. (2012). Inward FDI and the Size of the Market: Hosting MNCs or Promoting Domestic Companies?. In: Kemp, M.C., Nakagawa, H., Uchida, T. (eds) Positive and Normative Analysis in International Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230348202_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics