Abstract
A surprising number of interest advocates do participate in citizens’ forums despite the many challenges they pose. Yet it is not entirely clear why advocates would want to support processes of direct citizen deliberation. As argued in Chapter 3, participation on their part requires exposing their arguments to public scrutiny, committing resources to a process with unknown outcomes, and accepting lay citizens in the policy arena. However, the empirical cases show that there are clearly reasons why some advocates embrace the opportunity to engage in citizen deliberation. At the same time there are also groups and activists that resist such attempts and actively choose to subvert.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Carolyn M. Hendriks
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hendriks, C.M. (2011). Strategic Uses of Public Deliberation1. In: The Politics of Public Deliberation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230347564_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230347564_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31841-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-34756-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)