Abstract
Recent events in the world of banking have brought afresh to our attention a perennial problem in criminology: namely the nature of the criminological object. I have written elsewhere that criminology is paradoxically unable to state the nature of its object until it has completed its study into whatever that object might be (Crewe 2010a). The now famous claim by Michael and Adler (1933), who suggest that crime is no more nor less than that which is defined as such in law, prevents criminology from including in its conception of its object of study those egregious behaviours of, for example, investment bankers, the owners of the Herald of Free Enterprise, the traders of Enron, the owners of the Bhopal chemical plant and so on. That is, concentration on acts that are in contravention of the criminal code precludes study of behaviours which, while legal, clearly cause considerable harm. The workers of Enron, for example, broke no laws when they effectively robbed hospitals of their electricity supply (Elkind & McLean 2003). This has led to calls for criminology to define its object in terms of the magnitude of harm a particular problematic behaviour brings about. This has, by and large, become a call that divides criminology into two relatively secure camps: those for whom crime cannot be defined in any way other than as infraction of the law, and those for whom such an approach is to fail in one’s duty to speak truth to power.
We are all guilty of all and for all men before all, and I more than the others.
Dostoevsky (Brothers Karamazov)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. Augoustinos (1999) ‘Ideology, False Consciousness and Psychology’, Theory & Psychology, 9 (3): 295–312.
D. J. Crewe (2009) ‘Beyond Agency and Structure: Methodological Considerations for Researching the use of Restrictive Physical Intervention against Children in Jail’, Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 1 (2): 1–32.
D. J. Crewe (2010a) ‘Assemblage Theory and the Future for Criminology’, in R. Lippens and P. Van Calster (eds) New Directions for Criminology: Notes from Outside the Field (Antwerp: Maklu).
D. J. Crewe (2010b) ‘Power: The Supposed Definitions Revisited’, Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 2 (2): 22–68.
G. Deleuze (1994) [1968] Difference & Repetition, translated by P. Patton (New York: Columbia University Press).
G. Deleuze & F. Guattari (1994) What is Philosophy? Translated by. G. Burchell and H. Tomlinson (London. Verso).
E. Durkheim (1982) [1938] The Rules of Sociological Method, translated by W. D. Halls (New York: Free Press).
P. Elkind and B. McLean (2003) The Smartest Guys in the Room (London: Viking).
M. Heidegger (1984) [1928] The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic, translated by M. Heim (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
M. Heidegger (1996) [1926] Being and Time, translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson (Oxford: Blackwell).
P. Hillyard and S. Tombs (2007) ‘From “crime” to social harm?’, Crime Law and Social Change, 48: 9–25.
L. Hulsman (1986) ‘Critical Criminology and the Concept of Crime’, Contemporary Crises, 10 (1): 63–80.
B. C. Hutchens (2006) Levinas: A Guide for the Perplexed (New York: Continuum).
D. Janicaud (1991) ‘Phenomenology and the Theological Turn’, in D. Janicaud, J.-F. Courtine, J.-L. Chretien, M. Henry, J.-L. Marion and P. Ricoeur 2001, Phenomenology and the Theological Turn: the French Debate (New York: Fordham University Press).
P. Levi (1987) [1963] ‘The Truce’, in P. Levi, If This is a Man and The Truce (Harmondsworth: Abacus Sphere Penguin).
E. Levinas (1969) [1961] Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, translated by A. Lingis (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press).
E. Levinas (1987a) [1947] Time and the Other, translated by A. Lingis (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press).
E. Levinas (1987b) [1957] ‘Freedom and Command’, in A. Lingis (trans.) Collected Philosophical Papers of Emmanuel Levinas Phaenomenologica 100. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).
E. Levinas (1987c) [1972] ‘Meaning and Sense’, in A. Lingis (trans.) Collected Philosophical Papers of Emmanuel Levinas Phaenomenologica 100. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).
E. Levinas (1988) [1947] Existence and Existents, translated by A. Lingis (Dordrecht: Kleuwer).
E. Levinas (1990) [1963] Difficult Freedom: Essays on Judaism translated by S. Hand (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
E. Levinas (1993) [1957] ‘Philosophy and the Idea of the Infinite’, translated by A. Lingis in A. Peperzak (ed.) To the Other: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas (West Lafayette: Perdue University Press).
E. Levinas (1996a) [1962] ‘Transcendence and Height’, in A. T. Peperzak, S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds) Emmanuel Levinas: Basic Philosophical Writings (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
E. Levinas (1996b) [1968] ‘Substitution’, in A. T. Peperzak, S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds) Emmanuel Levinas: Basic Philosophical Writings (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
E. Levinas (1998) [1974] Otherwise than Being: Or Beyond Essence translated by A. Lingis (Pitsburg: Duquesne University Press).
E. Levinas (2001) Is it Righteous to be? Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas, (ed.) J. Robbins (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press).
E. Levinas (2003) [1935] On Escape, translated by B. Bergo (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
J. Michael and J. M. Adler (1933) Crime, Law and Social Science (Glen Ridge, NJ: Patterson Smith).
D. Perpich (2008) The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press).
G. Prauss (1999) [1977] Knowing and Doing in Heidegger’s Being and Time, translated by G. Steiner and J. Turner (New York: Humanity Books).
J. Reiman (1998) The Rich get Richer and the Poor get Prison: Ideology, Class and Criminal Justice (Boston: Alyn & Bacon).
J.-P. Sartre (1967) [1957] Being and Nothingness, translated by H. E. Barnes (London: Methuen).
R. Schürman (1990) [1987] Heidegger on Being and Acting: From Principles to Anarchy, translated by C. Gross (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
A. Travis (2008) ‘We think Crime is Rising: But is it?’, Guardian Thursday 23rd October.
R. Van Swaaningen (1997) Critical Criminology: Visions from Europe (London: Sage).
V. Vinokurov (2003) ‘Levinas’s Dostoevsky: A response to “Dostoevsky’s Derrida”’, Common Knowledge, 9 (2): 318–40.
M. Warnock (1967) Existentialist Ethics (London: Macmillan).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Don Crewe
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crewe, D. (2011). Crime, Harm and Responsibility. In: Hardie-Bick, J., Lippens, R. (eds) Crime, Governance and Existential Predicaments. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343184_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343184_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32876-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-34318-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)