Skip to main content

Heidegger, Restorative Justice and Desistance: A Phenomenological Perspective

  • Chapter
Crime, Governance and Existential Predicaments

Abstract

The restorative process, which ultimately must include the potential for the desistance from subsequent criminal activity, becomes predicated upon the relationship between community, victim and offender. Though rarely discussed as complementary criminological concepts, restorative justice and desistance evoke a similar triangulated institutional and cultural relationship, which seeks to address a variety of wrongs resulting from the criminal act. However, it is often assumed that the offender is exclusively responsible for the success of the restorative process, which often overlooks other co-occurring social realities that directly influence the outcome of this encounter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • A. Acorn (2004) Compulsory Compassion: A Critique of Restorative Justice (Vancouver and Toronto, Canada: University of British Columbia Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Arrigo, D. Milovanovic and C. Schehr (2005) The French Connection in Criminology: Rediscovering Crime, Law, and Social Change (Albany, NY: SUNY Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Arrigo and D. Milovanovic (2009) Revolution in Penology: Rethinking the Society of Captives. (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Bazemore and G. Erbe (2004) ‘Reintegration and Restorative Justice: Towards a Theory and Practice of Informal Social Control and Support’, in S. Maruna and R. Immarigeon (eds) After Crime and Punishment: Pathway: to Offender Reintegration (Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing), pp. 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Blattner (2005) ‘Temporality’, in H. Dreyfus and M. Wrathall (eds) A Companion to Heidegger (Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 312–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. C. Bracken, L. Deane and L. Morrissette (2009) ‘Desistance and Social Marginalization’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 13 (1): 61–78; 136204806 DOI: 10.1177/1362480608100173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Braithwaite (1989/1997) Crime, Shame and Reintegration (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Burnett (2005) ‘To Reoffend or not to Reoffend? The Ambivalence of Convicted Property Offenders’, in S. Maruna and R. Immarigeon (eds) After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration (Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing), pp. 152–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Caputo (1987) Radical Hermeneutics: Repetition, Deconstruction, and the Hermeneutic Project (Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Clegg (2010) ‘Malcolm X and Elijah Muhammad’, in R. Terrill (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Malcolm X (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), pp. 10–25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • D. Crewe (2010) ‘Power: The Supposed Definitions Revisited’, Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, vol. 2 (2): 22–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Daly (1999) ‘Does Punishment have a Place in Restorative Justice’, paper presented to The Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology Annual Conference, Perth, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. A. DeCaro (1996) On the Side of my People: A Religious Life of Malcolm X (New York, NY: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. L. Dreyfus (1995) Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division 1 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • W. E. B. Du Bois (1990) The Souls of Black Folk (New York, NY: Vintage Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Gadd and S. Farrall (2004) ‘Criminal Careers, Desistance and Subjectivity: Interpreting Men’s Narratives of Change’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 8 (2): 123–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Gavrielides (2008) ‘Restorative Justice — The Perplexing Concept: Conceptual Fault-lines and Power Battles Within the Restorative Justice Movement’, Criminology & Criminal Justice, vol. 8 (2): 165–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Gelven (1989) A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time (Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. M. Gerkin (2009) ‘Participation in Victim–Offender Mediation’, Criminal Justice Review, vol. 34 (2): 226–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Giordano, S. A. Cernkovich and J. Rudolph (2002) ‘Gender, Crime, and Desistance: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Transformation’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 107 (4): 990–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Gillespie (2010) ‘Autobiography and Identity: Malcolm X as Author and Hero’, in R. Terrill (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Malcolm X (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), pp. 26–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • D. Glaser (1964) Effectiveness of a Prison and Parole System (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Goldman (1979) The Death and Life of Malcolm X (New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Heidegger (1996) Being and Time, translated by J. Stambaugh (Albany, NY: SUNY Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Heidegger (2008) Ontology—The Hermeneutics of Facticity Translated by J. van Buren (Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Hirschi and M. Gottfredson (1983) ‘Age and the Explanation of Crime’, American Journal of Sociology, 89: 553–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Johnstone and D. W. Van Ness (2007) ‘The Meaning of Restorative Justice’, in G. Johnstone and D. Van Ness (eds) Handbook of Restorative Justice (Cullompton, Devon, UK: Willan Publishing), pp. 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. LeBel, R. Burnett, S. Maruna and S. Bushway (2008) ‘The “chicken and egg” of Subjective and Social Factors in Desistance from Crime’, European Journal of Criminology, vol. 5 (2): 131–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. R. Lilly, F. T. Cullen and R. A. Ball (2002) Criminological Theory: Context and Consequences 3rd edn (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm X. (1965) The Autobiography of Malcolm X (New York, NY: Ballantine Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Maruna (2001) Making Good: How Ex-convicts Reform and Rebuild their Lives (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • S. Maruna (2004) ‘Desistance from Crime and Explanatory Style: A New Direction in the Psychology of Reform’, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, vol. 20 (2): 184–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Massoglia and C. Uggen (2007) ‘Subjective Desistance and Transition to Adulthood’, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, vol. 23 (1): 90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Matza (1964) Delinquency and Drift (New York, NY: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. McCold and T. Wachtel (2002) ‘Restorative Justice Theory Validation’, in E. Weitekamp and H. -J. Kerner (eds) Restorative Justice: Theoretical Foundations (Cullompton, Devon, UK: Willan Publishing), pp. 110–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. A. McDowell and J. T. Whitehead (2009) ‘Varieties of Restorative Justice: Therapeutic Interventions in Context’, in D. Polizzi and M. Braswell (eds) Transforming Corrections: Humanistic Approaches to Corrections and Offender Treatment (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press), pp. 149–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Merleau-Ponty (2002) The Phenomenology of Perception 2nd edn (London, New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mills (2003) ‘A Phenomenology of Becoming’, in R. Frie (ed) Understanding Experience: Psychotherapy and Postmodernism (London, UK, New York, NY: Routledge), pp. 116–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Natanson (1986) Anonymity: A Study in the Philosophy of Alfred Schutz (Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Paternoster and S. Bushway (2009) ‘Desistance and the ‘feared self’: Toward an Identity Theory of Criminal Desistance’, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, vol. 99 (4): 1103–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Pavlich (2005) Governing Paradoxes of Restorative Justice (London, UK: Greenhouse Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Pavlich. (2004) ‘What are the Dangers as well as the Promises of Community Involvement?’, in H. Zehr and B. Toews (eds) Critical Issues in Restorative Justice (Monsey, NY & Cullompton, Devon, UK: Willan Publishing), pp. 173–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. R. Piquero (2004) ‘Somewhere Between Persistence and Desistance: The Intermittency of Criminal Careers’, in S. Maruna and R. Immarigeon (eds) After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration (Cullomptom, Devon, UK: Willan Publishing), pp. 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Polizzi (2003) The Experience of Antiblack Racism: A Phenomenological-Hermeneutic of the Autobiography of Malcolm X. Available from UMI Dissertation Services (UMI No. 3069293).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Polizzi. (2007) ‘The Social Construction of Race and Crime: The Image of the Black Offender’, International Journal of Restorative Justice, vol. 3 (1) 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Polizzi. (2008) ‘Restore to What? Restorative Justice and the Social Construction of the Offender’, International Journal of Restorative Justice, vol. 4 (2): 80–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Polizzi (2010) ‘Agnew’s General Strain Theory Reconsidered: A Phenomenological Perspective’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology (DOI: 10.1177/0306624X10380846).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Polizzi and S. Maruna (2010) ‘In Search of the Human in the Shadows of Correctional Practice: A Theoretical Reflection’, Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, vol. 2 (2): 158–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Presser (2009) ‘The Narratives of Offenders’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 13 (2): 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Quinney (2000a) ‘Social Humanism and the Problem of Crime: Thinking about Erich Fromm in the Development of Critical/Peacemaking Criminology’, in K. Anderson and R. Quinney (eds) Erich Fromm and Critical Criminology: Beyond the Punitive Society (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Quinney (2000b) Bearing Witness to Crime and Social Justice (Albany, NY: SUNY Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Roche (2003) Accountability in Restorative Justice (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sampson and J. Laub (1993) Crime in the Making (London: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Schutz (1967) The Phenomenology of the Social World translated by G. Walsh and F. Lehnert (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Schutz (1970) On Phenomenology and Social Relations (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Shapland, A. Atkinson, H. Atkinson, E. Colledge, J. Dignan, M. Howes, J. Johnstone, G. Robinson and A. Sorsby (2006) ‘Situating Restorative Justice Within Criminal Justice’, Theoretical Criminology, vol 10 (4): 505–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Sheehan (2007) ‘Dasein’, in H. Dreyfus and M. Wrathall (eds) A Companion to Heidegger (Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Spinelli (2005) The Interpreted World: An Introduction to Phenomenological Psychology (London, UK, Thousand Oaks, US: Sage Publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Strang (2002) Repair or Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ulmer and W. Spencer (1999) ‘The Contributions of an Interactionist Approach to Research and Theory on Criminal Careers’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 3 (1): 95–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. S. Umbreit (1994) Victim Meets Offender: The Impact of Restorative Justice and Mediation (Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. W. Van Ness (2002) ‘The Shape of Things to Come: A Framework for Thinking about a Restorative Justice System’, in E. Weitekamp and H. -J. Kerner (eds) Restorative Justice: Theoretical Foundations (Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing), pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Vaughan (2007) ‘The Internal Narrative of Desistance’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 47: 390–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Walgrave (2002) ‘From Community to Dominion: In Search of Social Values for Restorative Justice’, in E. Weitekamp and H.-J. Kerner (eds) Restorative Justice: Theoretical Foundations (Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing), pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Zehr (1985) ‘Retributive Justice, Restorative Justice’, New Perspectives on Crime and Justice Issue #4 (Akron, PA: Mennonite Central Committee Office of Criminal Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Zehr (1997) ‘Restorative Justice: The Concept’, Corrections Today, 59: 68–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Zimmerman (1981) Eclipse of the Self: The Development of Heidegger’s Concept of Authenticity (Athens, OH: University of Ohio Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 David Polizzi

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Polizzi, D. (2011). Heidegger, Restorative Justice and Desistance: A Phenomenological Perspective. In: Hardie-Bick, J., Lippens, R. (eds) Crime, Governance and Existential Predicaments. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343184_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics