Advertisement

Power in International Relations: An Interdisciplinary Perspective

  • Tuomas Forsberg
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series book series (PSIR)

Abstract

Power has traditionally been an extremely important notion in the study of international relations. In particular, the realist school of thought has built around it the whole theory of international relations. Hans Morgenthau (1979 [1948]) wanted to define the study of international politics through interests defined in terms of power. For Kenneth Waltz (1979), distribution of power was the key variable in determining the nature of an international system. John Mearsheimer (2001) regards power as the currency of great-power politics.

Keywords

International Relation Shared Understanding Ordinary Language Social Power World Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aron, R. (1966) Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company).Google Scholar
  2. Aron, R. (1986) ‘Macht, Power, Puissance: Democratic Prose or Demonical Poetry’ in S. Lukes (ed.) Power (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  3. Ashley, R. (1990) ‘Imposing International Purpose: Notes on a Problematic of Governance’ in E-O. Czempiel and J. Rosenau (eds) Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for 1990’s (Lexington: Lexington Books).Google Scholar
  4. Bachrach, P. and M.S. Baratz (1962) ‘Two Faces of Power’, American Political Science Review, 56: 641–51.Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin, D. (1989) Paradoxes of Power (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  6. Ball, T. (1988) Transforming Political Discourse (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  7. Barnes, B. (1988) The Nature of Power (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press).Google Scholar
  8. Barnett, M. and R. Duvall (2005a) ‘Power in International Politics’, International Organization 59: 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnett, M. and R. Duvall (2005b) ‘Power in Global Governance’ in M. Barnett and R. Duvall (eds) Power in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  10. Berenskoetter, F. (2007) ‘Thinking About Power’ in F. Berenskoetter and M. Williams (eds) Power in World Politics (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  11. Boulding, K. (1989) Three Faces of Power (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1986) ‘The Forms of Capital’ in J. Richardson (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (New York: Greenwood).Google Scholar
  13. Carr, E.H. (2001 [1939]) Twenty Years’ Crisis: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan).Google Scholar
  14. Collier, A. (1994) Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy (London: Verso).Google Scholar
  15. Connolly, W. (1983) The Terms of Political Discourse, 2nd edn (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Dahl, R. (1957) ‘The Concept of Power’, Behavioral Science, 2(3): 202–15.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, J.W. (2000) Threats and Promises. The Pursuit of International Influence (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  18. Dowding, K. (1996) Power (Buckingham: Open University Press).Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1994) Power. Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 3, J.D. Faubion (ed.) (London: Penguin Books).Google Scholar
  20. French, J. and B. Raven (1960) ‘The Bases of Social Power’ in D. Cartwright (ed.) Studies in Social Power (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan).Google Scholar
  21. Guzzini, S. (1993) ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’, International Organization, 47: 443–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guzzini, S. (2005) ‘The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis’, Millennium, 33: 495–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Habermas, J. (1984) Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Boston: Beacon Press).Google Scholar
  24. Ham, P. van (2010) Social Power in International Politics (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  25. Hart, J. (1976) ‘Three Approaches to the Measurement of Power in International Relations’, International Organization, 30(2): 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haugaard, M. and S. Malesevic (2008) ‘Power and Culture’, Journal of Power, 1(2): 109–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hindness, B. (1996) Discourses of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  28. Isaac, J. (1987) Power and Marxist Theory (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  29. Lake, D. (2009) Hierarchy in International Relations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  30. Lamborn, A.C. (1991) The Price of Power: Risk and Foreign Policy in Britain, France, and Germany (Boston: Unwin Hyman).Google Scholar
  31. Luhmann, N. (1979) Trust and Power (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons).Google Scholar
  32. Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lukes, S. (2005) ‘Power and the Battle for Hearts and Minds’, Millennium, 33: 477–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mann, M. (1986) Sources of Social Power, Vol. 1: A History of Power from the Beginning to a.d. 1760 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mann, M. (1993) Sources of Social Power, Vol. 2: The Rise of Classes and Nation- States 1760–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mearsheimer, J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W.W. Norton).Google Scholar
  37. Mattern, J.B. (2008) ‘The Concept of Power and the (Un)Discipline of International Relations’ in C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (eds) Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  38. Morgenthau, H. (1978 [1948]) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th edn (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).Google Scholar
  39. Morriss, P. (1987) Power: A Philosophical Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  40. Mueller, J. (1995) Quiet Cataclysm: Reflections on Recent Transformations of World Politics (New York: HarperCollins).Google Scholar
  41. Nagel, J. (1975) The Descriptive Analysis of Power (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  42. Neumann, I. and O.J. Sending (2010) Governing the Global Polity: Practice, Mentality, Rationality (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
  43. Nye, J. (2004) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: PublicAffairs).Google Scholar
  44. Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  45. Oppenheim, F. (1981) Political Concepts: A Reconstruction (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  46. Parsons, T. (1963) ‘On the Concept of Power’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 107: 232–62.Google Scholar
  47. Rosenau, J. (1980) The Study of Global Interdependence: Essays in the Transnationalization of Global Affairs (London: Pinter).Google Scholar
  48. Rothgeb, J. (1993) Defining Power: Influence and Force in the Contemporary International System (New York: St. Martin’s Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Russell, B. (1938) Power: A New Social Analysis (London: Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
  50. Searle, J. (2010) Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strange, S. (1988) States and Markets: An Introduction to International Political Economy (London: Pinter).Google Scholar
  52. Waltz, K. (1979) A Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tuomas Forsberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tuomas Forsberg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations