Advertisement

Geographies of the International System: Globalization, Empire and the Anthropocene

  • Simon Dalby
Chapter
  • 187 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series book series (PSIR)

Abstract

In the latter stages of the cold war, and through the early decades of the age of globalization, political scientists dominated the study of international relations. Notions of global politics were frequently presumed to be a matter of inter-state relations, and the study of international politics was frequently just the study of relations between territorial states. Other scholars made contributions, but the discussions of the pursuit of peace and power, to borrow Hans Morgenthau’s (1948) canonical formulation, was both a political science question in the academy, and to a substantial extent also an American scholarly preoccupation. Examining this in light of concerns about interdisciplinarity, and the contribution that other disciplines might make to the discussion implicitly raises the question of why the other disciplines might be largely missing in the first place. As Raymond Miller (2010) suggests, international relations has been dominated by political science for a very long time. Attempts at interdisciplinarity, while long part of the history of international studies, have not altered this hegemony (see  Chapter 2).

Keywords

International Relation International System Homeland Security Territorial State Global Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agnew, J. (2003) Geopolitics: Revisioning World Politics, 2nd edn (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  2. Agnew, J. (2005) Hegemony: The New Shape of Global Power (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Agnew, J. (2009) Globalization and Sovereignty (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield).Google Scholar
  4. Bacevich, A.J. (2008) The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism (New York, NY: Metropolitan Books).Google Scholar
  5. Bayly, C. and T. Harper (2008) Forgotten Wars: The End of Britain’s Asian Empire (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
  6. Bigo, D. and R.B.J. Walker (2007) ‘International, Political, Sociology’, International Political Sociology, 1: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brauch, H-G, S. Dalby and U. Oswald Spring (2011) ‘Political Geoecology for the Anthropocene’ in H-G Brauch, U. Oswald Spring, P. Kameri-Mbote, C. Mesjasz, J. Grin, B. Chourou, P. Dunay and J. Birkmann (eds) Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks (Berlin-Heidelberg – New York: Springer-Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buzan, B. and R. Little (2001) ‘Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About It’, Millennium, 30(1): 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr, E.H. (1946) The Twenty Years Crisis: 1919–1939 (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  10. Castells, M. (1996–8) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, 3 vols (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, B.J. (2007) ‘The Transatlantic Divide: Why Are American and British IPE So Different?’, Review of International Political Economy, 14: 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalby, S. (2005) ‘Political Space: Autonomy, Liberalism and Empire’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 30: 415–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dalby, S. (2006) ‘Geopolitics, Grand Strategy and the Bush Doctrine: The Strategic Dimensions of U.S. Hegemony under George W. Bush’ in C.P. David and D. Grondin (eds) Hegemony or Empire? The Redefinition of American Power under George W. Bush (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
  14. Dalby, S. (2007a) ‘Regions, Strategies, and Empire in the Global War on Terror’, Geopolitics, 12: 586–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalby, S. (2007b) ‘Geopolitical Knowledge: Scale, Method and the Willy Sutton Syndrome’, Geopolitics, 12: 183–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalby, S. (2009a) ‘Geopolitics, the Revolution in Military Affairs and the Bush Doctrine’, International Politics, 46(2): 234–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dalby, S. (2009b) Security and Environmental Change (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  18. Elden, S. (2009) Terror and Territory: The Spatial Extent of Sovereignty (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
  19. Ferguson, N. (2008) The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World (New York: Penguin).Google Scholar
  20. Graham, S. (2010) Cities Under Siege: The New Military Urbanism (London: Verso).Google Scholar
  21. Higgott, R. and M. Watson (2008) ‘All at Sea in a Barbed Wire Canoe: Professor Cohen’s Transatlantic Voyage in IPE’, Review of International Political Economy, 15: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ignatieff, M. (2003) Empire Lite: Nation-Building in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan (New York: Viking).Google Scholar
  23. Ingram, A. and K. Dodds (eds) (2009) Spaces of Security and Insecurity (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
  24. Jackson, R. (2000) The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  25. James, H. (2006) The Roman Predicament: How the Rules of International Order Create the Politics of Empire (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  26. Jones, R. (2009) ‘Geopolitical Boundary Narratives, the Global War on Terror and Border Fencing in India’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS, 34: 290–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaldor, M. (2007) New and Old Wars, 2nd edn (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  28. Kaplan, R. (2005) Imperial Grunts: The American Military on the Ground (New York: Random House).Google Scholar
  29. Kearns, G. (2009) Geopolitics and Empire: The Legacy of Halford Mackinder (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keil, R. and R. Mahon (eds) (2009) Leviathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press).Google Scholar
  31. Kilcullen, J. (2010) Counterinsurgency (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klein, B. (1994) Strategic Studies and World Order: The Global Politics of Deterrence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuus, M. (2007) Geopolitics Reframed: Security and Identity in Europe’s Eastern Enlargement (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leichenko, R. and K. O’Brien (2008) Environmental Change and Globalization: Double Exposures (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lipschutz, R. (2009) The Constitution of Imperium (Boulder: Paradigm).Google Scholar
  36. Long, D. (2006) ‘Who Killed the International Studies Conference?’, Review of International Studies, 32: 603–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mackinder, H.J. (1904) ‘The Geographical Pivot of History’, The Geographical Journal, 23: 421–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mearsheimer, J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
  39. Miller, R. (2010) ‘Interdisciplinarity: Its Meaning and Consequences’ in R.A. Denemark (ed.) International Studies Online/International Studies Encyclopedia (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).Google Scholar
  40. Morgenthau, H. (1948) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar
  41. Newell, P. (2008) ‘The Political Economy of Global Environmental Governance’, Review of International Studies, 34: 507–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nitzan, J. and S. Bichler (2009) Capital as Power: A Study of Order and Creorder (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  43. Ó Tuathail, G. (1996) Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
  44. Pieterse, J.N. (2007) ‘Political and Economic Brinkmanship’, Review of International Political Economy, 14: 467–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pirages, D. (1978) The New Context for International Relations: Global Ecopolitics (North Scituate, MA: Duxbury).Google Scholar
  46. Ripsman, N.M. and T.V. Paul (2010) Globalization and the National Security State (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  47. Roseneau, J.N. (1997) Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sassen, S. (2008) Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages, paperback edn (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sjoberg, L. (2008) ‘Scaling IR Theory: Geography’s Contribution to Where IR Takes Place’, International Studies Review, 10: 472–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith, N. (2003) American Empire: Roosevelt’s Geographer and the Prelude to Globalization (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  51. Sparke, M. (2005) In the Space of Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
  52. Steffen, W., P. Crutzen and J.R. McNeill (2007) ‘The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?’, Ambio, 36: 614–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strange, S. (1994) States and Markets (London: Pinter).Google Scholar
  54. Vitalis, R. (2006) ‘Theory Wars of Choice: Hidden Casualties in the “Debate” between Hegemony and Empire’ in C. David and D. Grondin (eds) Hegemony or Empire? The Redefinition of American Power under George W. Bush (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
  55. Walker, R.B.J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  56. Walker, R.B.J. (2006a) ‘Lines of Insecurity: International, Imperial, Exceptional’, Security Dialogue, 37: 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walker, R.B.J. (2006b) ‘On the Protection of Nature and the Nature of Protection’ in J. Huysmans, A. Dobson and R. Prokhovnik (eds) The Politics of Protection: Sites of Insecurity and Political Agency (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  58. Walker, R.B.J. (2010) After the Globe, before the World (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  59. Williams, J. (2008) ‘Space, Scale, and Just War: Meeting the Challenge of Humanitarian Intervention and Transnational Terrorism’, Review of International Studies, 34: 581–600.Google Scholar
  60. Wright, Q. (1955) The Study of International Relations (New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts).Google Scholar
  61. Zacher, M. (2001) ‘The International Territorial Order: Boundaries, the Use of Force, and Normative Change’, International Organization, 55: 215–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Simon Dalby 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Dalby

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations