Skip to main content

The Performance of Astrophel and Stella in the 1591 Quartos

  • Chapter

Abstract

The two quartos of Astrophel and Stella published in 1591 for Thomas Newman started the late Elizabethan sonnet craze. Although Astrophel and Stella was not the first Petrarchan sonnet sequence in English, it was obviously the most influential. Between 1591 and 1609, the year in which Shakespeare’s sonnets were published, about forty sonnet sequences were published, so various in form that no single definition of a “sonnet sequence ” is quite adequate.1 While the Elizabethans recognized the difference between fourteen-line poems with particular rhyme schemes and other lyric forms, they used the term “sonnet” to comprise all those kinds. In the 1591 quartos of Astrophel and Stella, in fact, the fourteen-line “sonnets” go without labels or numbers, but the poems we call Sidney’s “songs” are labeled “sonnets,” including the fifteen-stanza, ninety-line song v. Sonnet sequences in my count comprise mostly standard sonnets arranged in groups and divided by shorter sections of more variable poetry, frequently designated “odes,” “madrigals,” “pastorals,” or “songs.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Thomas P. Roche Jr., Petrarch and the English Sonnet Sequences (New York: AMS Press, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Michael G. Spiller’s Development of the Sonnet: an Introduction (New York: Routledge, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. William A. Ringler Jr., ed. The Poems of Sir Philip Sidney (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962), 456.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edward Arber, ed. A Transcript of the Register of the Company of Stationers of London, 1554–1640 A.D. vol. 1 of 5 (New York: P. Smith, 1951), 555.

    Google Scholar 

  5. John Pitcher, “Daniel, Samuel (1562/3–1619),” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/7120, accessed August 23, 2007]

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. R. Woudhuysen, Sir Philip Sidney and the Circulation of Manuscripts 1558–1640 (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1996), 359.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roger Kuin, Chamber Music: Elizabethan Sonnet-Sequences and the Pleasure of Criticism (Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press, 1998), 177

    Google Scholar 

  8. William Barker, “Fraunce, Abraham (1559?-1592/3?),” in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, ed. H. C. G. Matthew and Brian Harrison (Oxford: OUP, 2004), http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/10133 (accessed October 8, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacD. P. Jackson, “The Printer of the First Quarto of Astrophil and Stella (1591),” Studies in Bibliography 31 (1979): 201–03

    Google Scholar 

  10. Christopher Wilson, “Astrophil and Stella: A Tangled Editorial Web,” The Library 6.1 (1979): 336–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Germaine Warkentin, “Patrons and Profiteers: Thomas Newman and the ‘Violent enlargement’ of Astrophil and Stella,” The Book Collector 34.4 (1985): 480–1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gavin Alexander, Writing After Sidney: The Literary Response to Sir Philip Sidney, 1586–1640 (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 2007), 136–41

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kelly Quinn, “Fulke Greville’s Friendly Patronage” in Studies in Philology 103 (2006): 417–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harold Love, Scribal Publication in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Arthur F. Marotti, Manuscript, Print, and the English Renaissance Lyric (Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wendy Wall, The Imprint of Gender: Authorship and Publication in the English Renaissance, (Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heidi Brayman Hackel, Reading Material in Early Modern England: Print, Gender, and Literacy (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005), 146.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. C. Hamilton, “Sidney’s Astrophil and Stella as a Sonnet Sequence” ELH 36 (1969): 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. David Kalstone, Sidney’s Poetry: Contexts and Interpretations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1965), 122–23, 140–78

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Neil Rudenstine, Sidney’s Poetic Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1967), 250–62

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Ann Rosalind Jones and Peter Stallybrass, “The Politics of Astrophil and Stella,” SEL 24 (1984): 54, 59, 68.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Paul Allen Miller, “Sidney, Petrarch, and Ovid, or Imitation as Subversion,” ELH 58 (1991): 505–06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Andrew Strycharski, “Literacy, Education, and Affect in Astrophil and Stella,” SEL 48 (2008): 54.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thomas P. Roche Jr., “Astrophil and Stella: A Radical Reading,” in Spenser Studies: A Renaissance Poetry Annual 3 (1982): 139–191.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Margreta de Grazia, “Lost Potential in Grammar and Nature: Sidney’s Astrophil and Stella,” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1800 21 (1981): 23, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Greenblatt’s Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Louis Montrose’s “The Elizabethan Subject and the Spenserian Text,” in Literary Theory/Renaissance Texts, ed. Patricia Parker and David Quint (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1986), 303–40

    Google Scholar 

  28. Joel Fineman, Shakespeare’s Perjured Eye: The Invention of Poetic Subjectivity in the Sonnets (Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Henry W. Russell, “Astrophil and Stella: Hell in a Very Small Place,” Renascence 44.2 (1992): 105–114, and C.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stuart Hunter, “Erected Wit and Infected Will: Sidney’s Poetic Theory and Practice,” Sidney Newsletter 5.2 (1984): 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Richard B. Young, “English Petrarke: A Study of Sidney’s Astrophel and Stella” in Three Studies in the Renaissance: Sidney, Jonson, Milton, Yale Studies in English vol. 138 (New Haven, CT, Yale Univ. Press, 1958), 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Heather Dubrow, Echoes of Desire: English Petrarchism and its Counterdiscourses (Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press, 1995), 110, 114.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tom Parker’s Proportional Form in the Sonnets of the Sidney Circle: Loving in Truth (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Michael Baird Saenger, “Did Sidney Revise Astrophil and Stella?” Studies in Philology 96 (1999): 417–38.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Annibel Jenkins, “A Second Astrophel and Stella Cycle,” in Renaissance Papers (1970), 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Herman, Peter C., ed., Sir Philip Sidney’s An Apology for Poetry and Astrophil and Stella: Texts and Contexts, (Glen Allen, VA: College Publishing, 2001), 119.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rudenstine, Sidney’s Poetic Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1967), 150

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Lisa Freinkel, Reading Shakespeare’s Will: The Theology of Figure from Augustine to the Sonnets (New York; Columbia Univ. Press, 2002), 42–45 and 179–80.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yvor Winters, “The Sixteenth Century Lyric in England: A Critical and Historical Reinterpretation,” Poetry 53 (February and March 1939): 258–72, 320–35; 54 (April 1939): 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Annie Finch, The Ghost of Meter: Culture and Prosody in American Free Verse (Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press, 1993), especially chapters 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Paul Fussell, Poetic Meter and Poetic Form (New York: Random House, 1979), 103.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Frank Whigham, Ambition & Privilege: The Social Tropes of Elizabethan Courtesy Theory (Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press, 1984), 33–36, 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Raphael Falco, Conceived Presences: Literary Genealogy in Renaissance England (Amherst, MA: Univ. of Massachusetts Press, 1994) for the complete version of this argument.

    Google Scholar 

  44. William Shakespeare, The Sonnets and A Lover’s Complaint, ed. and intro. by John Kerrigan (New York: Penguin, 1986), 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kerrigan follows Katherine Duncan-Jones, “Was the 1609 Shakes-peares Sonnets really unauthorized?” Review of English Studies 34 n.s. (1983): 151–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Heather Dubrow, “‘Dressing old words new’? Re-evaluating the ‘Delian Structure,’” in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Sonnets, ed. Michael Carl Schoenfeldt (Maiden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2007), 90–103.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kelly Quinn, “Mastering Complaint: Michael Drayton’s Peirs Gaveston and the Royal Mistress Complaints” ELR 38 (2008): 444

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ronald Primeau, “Daniel and the Mirror Tradition: Dramatic Irony in The Complaint of RosamondSEL 15 (1975): 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  49. Quinn’s “Ecphrasis and Reading Practices in Elizabethan Narrative Verse” SEL 44 (2004): 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  50. John Kerrigan’s Motives of Woe: Shakespeare and “Female Complaint” (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991) is an excellent critical anthology of the subgenre.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Robert E. Stillman, Philip Sidney and the Poetics of Renaissance Cosmopolitanism (Burlington, VT: Ashgate Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lloyd E. Berry, ed. The English Works of Giles Fletcher, the Elder (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1964), 3–49

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lucy Munro, “Fletcher, Giles, the elder (bap. 1546, d. 1611),” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, Sept 2004; online edition, January 2008 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/9726, accessed November 5, 2009]

    Google Scholar 

  54. Giles Fletcher the Elder, Licia, or Poemes of Love, in Honour of the admirable and singular virtues of his Lady, to the imitation of the best Latin Poets, and others (Cambridge, 1593), STC 11055, Sig. A4.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Anne Lake Prescott, “Licia’s Temple: Giles Fletcher the Elder and Number Symbolism,” Renaissance et Réforme 2 (1978): 170–181.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Joel B. Davis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, J.B. (2011). The Performance of Astrophel and Stella in the 1591 Quartos. In: The Countesse of Pembrokes Arcadia and the Invention of English Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230339705_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics