Abstract
Social scientists did not pay adequate attention to the toxic and hazardous wastes generated in the course of industrial production in the United States during much of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. There was a general failure to closely examine the interaction among the social, technological, and natural processes that often produce hazards and major disasters. Although systematic studies of disasters in the United States can be traced back to the 1940s-1950s (e.g., Lemons, 1957; Fritz and Williams, 1957), it was not until the late 1960s and early 1970s that the issue of toxic waste began to command the attention of many sociologists and other social scientists. In 1984, James F. Short particularly challenged sociologists to get involved in the study of risks, risk analysis, and disasters.1 A series of catastrophic events during the period, involving extensive contamination and disruption of communities, loss of lives, and destruction of properties directed scholarly interest into the study of disasters and risks. Much of the emergent sociological research on disasters focused on short-term social responses to disasters of natural or human etiologies (Kreps, 1985; Kreps and Drabeck, 1996; Quarantelli and Dynes, 1977).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
James F. Short, “The Social Fabric at Risk: Toward the Social Transformation of Risk Analysis,” American Sociological Review 49 (1984): 711–725.
Robert E. Hernan, This Borrowed Earth: Lessons from the 15 Worst Environmental Disasters around the World (New York: Palgrave/Macmillan, 2010).
Hernan, Borrowed Earth, pp. 61–100; Phil Brown, Toxic Exposures: Contested Illnesses and the Environmental Movement (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007).
Elizabeth D. Blum, Love Canal Revisited: Race, Class, and Gender in Environmental Activism (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2008).
Phil Brown and E. J. Mikkelson, No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia and Community Action (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990).
Robert D. Bullard, Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class and Environmental Quality (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990).
B. L. Allen, Uneasy Alchemy: Citizens and Experts in Louisiana Chemical Corridor Disputes (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003).
See P. Brown, “Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 3 (September, 1992): 267–281.
Hernan, Borrowed Earth, pp. 61–100; M. R. Edelstein, Contaminated Communities: The Social and Psychological Impacts of Residential Toxic Exposure (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1988): 43–83.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Francis O. Adeola
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adeola, F.O. (2011). Sociology of Hazardous Wastes, Disasters, and Risk. In: Hazardous Wastes, Industrial Disasters, and Environmental Health Risks. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230339538_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230339538_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29821-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-33953-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)