Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International and Development Education ((INTDE))

Abstract

Methods and methodology are fundamental to the cognitive structure of any field of study (Wells 1981). Their nature and role have generated a great deal of debate, both within the field of comparative education and, more generally, within the academic community. The purpose of this chapter is to describe how research strategies have evolved since comparative education became an academic field of study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bereday, George Z. F. 1964. Comparative Method in Education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • CER Editorial Office. 2003. Annual Report of the Comparative Education Review. New Orleans: Comparative and International Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, Robert. 1980. “Comparative Education in Europe: A Note.” Comparative Education Review 24 (1): 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, John W. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1910. How We Think. Boston: D. C. Heath.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Myron. 1986. “Field Work in a Hostile Environment.” Comparative Education Review 10 (2): 367–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Juergen. 1984–1989. The Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by T. McCarthy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans, Nicholas. 1955. Comparative Education: A Study of Educational Factors and Traditions. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra. 1987. Feminism and Methodology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrickson, Leslie, Steve Faison, and Val D. Rust. 2003. “Theory in Comparative Education.” World Studies in Education 4 (1): 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Brian. 1977. “The Positivist Debate in Comparative Education: An Anglo-Saxon Perspective.” Comparative Education 13 (2): 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Brian. 1984. “Paradigm Shifts in Comparative Education.” Comparative Education Review 28 (4): 584–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, Isaac. 1930. Essays in Comparative Education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, Isaac. 1933. Comparative Education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauden, L. 1977. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longino, Helen. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonner, Walter J. and John W. Berry. 1986. Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Bernard S. 1976. Social Research: Strategy and Tactics. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1931. The Scientific Outlook. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, Val D., Aminata Soumaré, Octavio Pescador, and Megumi Shibuya. 1999. “Research Strategies in Comparative Education.” Comparative Education Review 43 (1): 86–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Friedrich. 1931/32. “Internationale Paedagogik, Auslands Paedagogik, Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft: Geschichte, Wesen, Methoden, Aufgaben und Ergebnisse.” Internationale Zeitschrift fuer Erziehungswissenschaft 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Friedrich. 1961. Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Quelle und Meyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Barney G. and Anselm L. Glasser. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Richard H. and J. Steven Picou. 1981. American Sociology: Theoretical and Methodological Structure. Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 John N. Hawkins and W. James Jacob

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rust, V.D., Liao, X. (2011). The Evolving Nature of Comparative Education Research. In: Hawkins, J.N., Jacob, W.J. (eds) Policy Debates in Comparative, International, and Development Education. International and Development Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230339361_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics