Skip to main content
  • 325 Accesses

Abstract

The rejected suitor continues to pursue the woman, sending her flowers and candy, dedicating songs to her on the radio, calling her, and emailing her. As his obsession grows, he follows her to the grocery store, lurks outside her house as she goes about her daily chores, and even watches her dust the living room via a webcam. A soundtrack plays in his mind, articulating his pain: “Baby, come back” and “Don’t you want me baby? Don’t you want me, oooh …” In one of the most memorable advertising campaigns of recent years, mops, brooms, and feather dusters pine for the women who have abandoned them after purchasing new Swiffer cleaning products like the Swiffer Wet Jet. The commercials end with the tagline “Swiffer gives cleaning a whole new meaning.”1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Vanessa Facenda, “This is One Swiffer Picker-Upper,” Brandweek, February 11, 2008, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brian Rupp, “Pity Those Loser Mops,” Brandweek, August 25, 2008, 60.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Susan Strasser, Never Done: A History of American Housework (New York: Henry Holt, 1982, 2000), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ruth Schwartz Cowan, More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave (New York: Basic Books, 1983), 45.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christine Bose, Philip Bereano, and Mary Malloy, “Household Technology and the Social Construction of Housework,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 25, no. 1 (1984): 53–82.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eileen B. Leonard, Women, Technology, and the Myth of Progress (Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joel Mokyr, “Why ‘More Work for Mother?’ Knowledge and Household Behavior, 1870–1945,” Journal of Economic History 60, no. 1 (2000): 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alana Erickson Coble, Cleaning Up: The Transformation of Domestic Service in Twentieth Century New York (New York: Routledge, 2006), 89.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Faye E. Dudden, Serving Women: Household Service in Nineteenth-Century America (Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1983), 107.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marilyn Irvin Holt, Linoleum, Better Babies and the Modern Farm Woman, 1890–1930 (Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 1995), 40.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Phyllis Palmer, Domesticity and Dirt: Housewives and Domestic Servants in the United States, 1920–1945 (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1989), 90, 138.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Daniel E. Sutherland, Americans and Their Servants: Domestic Service from 1800 to 1920 (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1981), 10, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Suellen Hoy, Chasing Dirt: The American Pursuit of Cleanliness (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guliz Ger and Baskin Yeniciglu, “Clean and Dirty: Playing with Boundaries of Consumers’ Safe Havens,” Advances in Consumer Research 31 (2004): 462–467.

    Google Scholar 

  15. William Smyth, “Oh! To Be Clean: Domestic Cleanliness in Mid-Nineteenth-Century America,” Lamar Journal of Humanities 17, no. 2 (1993): 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Juliann Sivulka, Stronger Than Dirt: A Cultural History of Advertising Personal Hygiene in America, 1875 to 1940 (Amherst: Humanity Books, 2001), 63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. On germ theory, see Lydia Martens and Sue Scott, “Under the Kitchen Surface: Domestic Products and Conflicting Constructions of Home,” Home Cultures 3, no. 1 (2006): 42–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. see Don Fernandez, “Swept Up in Need to Clean: In an Era of High Anxiety, We’re Finding Comfort in the Conquest of Grime, Germs, and Untidiness,” Atlanta Journal Constitution, November 28, 2004, MS1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. On domestic reform, see Dolores Hayden, Grand Domestic Revolution: A History of Feminist Designs for American Homes, Neighborhoods, and Cities (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jennifer Scanlon, “Old Housekeeping, New Housekeeping, or No Housekeeping? The Kitchenless Home Movement and the Women’s Service Magazine,” Journalism History 30, no. 1 (2004): 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lawrence Samuel, Brought to You By: Postwar Television Advertising and the American Dream (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Julianne Sivulka, Soap, Sex, and Cigarettes: A Cultural History of American Advertising (Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing, 1998), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pamela Walker Laird writes in Advertising Progress: American Business and the Rise of Consumer Marketing (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998), 5: “Prior to the 1890s, the vast majority of advertisements were created by merchants and manufacturers, aided by printers but not by specialized advertising professionals. This is still the case for the legions of small advertisers in all media.” However, advertising agencies created the vast majority of the ads and commercials I examined.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Regina Blaszczyk, American Consumer Society, 1865–2005: From Hearth to HDTV (Wheeling: Harlan Davidson, 2005), 124–125; 130–131.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gail Collins, America’s Women: 400 Years of Dolls, Drudges, Helpmates, and Heroines (New York: Harper Collins, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Christina Hardyment, Dream Babies: Three Centuries of Good Advice on Child Care (New York: Harper Row, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sarah Leavitt, From Catherine Beecher to Martha Stewart: A Cultural History of Domestic Advice (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Megan Elias, Stir it Up: Home Economics in American Culture (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Laurel D. Graham, “Domesticating Efficiency: Lillian Gilbreth’s Scientific Management of Homemakers, 1924–1930,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 24, no. 3 (1999): 633–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Janice Williams Rutherford, Selling Mrs. Consumer: Christine Frederick and the Rise of Household Efficiency (Athens: The University of Georgia Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Laura Shapiro, Perfection Salad: Women and Cooking at the Turn of the Century (New York: Farrar, Straus, and iroux, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sarah Stage and Virginia Vincenti, Rethinking Home Economics: Women and the History of a Profession (New York: Cornell University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Eileen Boris, “The Home as Workplace: Deconstructing Dichotomies,” International Review of Social History 39 (1994): 415–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nancy Christie, “Women, the Public Sphere, and Middle class Culture,” Journal of Women’s History 20, no. 1 (2008): 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Judy Giles, The Parlour and the Suburb: Domestic Identities, Class, Femininity and Modernity (Oxford: Berg Publishers, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nona Y. Glazer, “Servants to Capital: Unpaid Domestic Labor and Paid Work,” Review of Radical Political Economics 16, no. 1 (1984): 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Joan B. Landes, “Further Thoughts on the Public/Private Distinction,” Journal of Women’s History 15, no. 2 (2003): 28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Susan Ingalls Lewis, Unexceptional Women: Female Proprietors in Mid-Nineteenth Century Albany, New York, 1830–1885 (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Alison Piepmeir, “Stepping Out: Rethinking the Public and Private Spheres,” Journal of Women’s History 18, no. 3 (2006): 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Joan W. Scott and Debra Keates, eds., Going Public: Feminism and Shifting Boundaries of the Private Sphere (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nicole Tonkovich, “Ghosts of Domesticities Past,” Journal of Women’s History 18, no. 3 (2006): 118–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim Warren, “Separate Spheres: Analytical Persistence in United States Women’s History,” History Compass 5, no. 1 (2007): 262–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. On race, see Elizabeth ClarkLewis, Living In, Living Out: African-American Domestics in Washington, D.C, 1910–1940 (Washington: Smithsonian Institute Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sarah Deutsch, Separate Refuge: Culture, Class, and Gender on the Anglo-Hispanic Frontier in the American Southwest, 1880–1940 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Evelyn Nakano Glen, Issei, Nisei, War Bride: Three Generations of Japanese American Women in Domestic Service (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Diane Hotten-Somers, “Relinquishing and Reclaiming Independence: Irish Domestic Servants, American Middle Class Mistresses, and Assimilation, 1850–1920,” Eire-Ireland 36, nos. 1–2 (2001): 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jacqueline Jones, Labor of Love, Labor of Sorrow: Black Women, Work, and the Family from Slavery to the Present (New York: Basic Books, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Marilyn Maness Mehaffy, “Advertising Race/Raceing Advertising: The Feminine Consumer (-Nation), 1876–1900,” Signs: The Journal of Women in Culture and Society 23, no. 1 (1997): 121–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Glenna Matthew, Just a Housewife:” The Rise and Fall of Domesticity in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), 35.

    Google Scholar 

  50. See also Linda J. Rynbrandt, Caroline Bartlett Crane and Progressive Reform: Social Housekeeping as Sociology (New York: Garland, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Daphne Spain, How Women Saved the City (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Nancy Flobre, “The Unproductive Housewife: Her Evolution in Nineteenth-Century Economic Thought,” Signs 16, no. 1 (1991): 463–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dana Frank, “Housewives, Socialists, and the Politics of Food: The 1917 New York Cost-of-Living Protests,” Feminist Studies 11, no. 2 (1985): 255–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Izola Forrester, “Women Capture the Food Market,” Good Housekeeping, May 1912, 670–675.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lesley Johnson and Justin Lloyd, Sentenced to Everyday Life: Feminism and the Housewife (New York: Berg Publishers, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sylvie Murray, The Progressive Housewife: Community Activism in Suburban Queens, 1945–1965 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Annelise Orleck, “‘We are that mythical thing called the public:’ Militant Housewives During the Great Depression,” Feminist Studies 19, no. 1 (1993): 147–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lesley Johnson and Justin Lloyd, Sentenced to Everyday Life: Feminism and the Housewife (New York: Berg Publishers, 2004). On the 1960s debate, see Norah Lee Alter, “I Won’t Apologize for Being a Housewife!” Ladies Home Journal, June 1979, 24+; Terry Martin Hekker, “Up With Housewives!” Good Housekeeping, May 1978, 250+; “Evelyn Kaye, “Housewife Power!” Parents Magazine, August 1979, 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Patricia Kroken, “I’m a Housewife and I Have the Right to Be Proud,” Redbook, July 1973, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Shirley Streshinsky, “Why Housewife is No Longer a Dirty Word,” Redbook, February 1978, 90+.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Assumptions about female consumers continue to shape housework advertising, even when industry studies suggest marketing to men could increase sales. Anthony Astrachan, “Marketing to Men: Magnifying Changes in Masculine Marketplace,” Advertising Age, October 8, 1984, 11–13; “Large Number of Husbands Buy Household Products, Do Housework,” Marketing News, October 3, 1980, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lenore Skenazy, “Dads are the New Moms, So It’s Time to Start Selling Them Stuff,” Advertising Age, August 20, 2007, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Laura Zinn, “Real Men Buy Paper Towels Too,” Business Week, November 9, 1992, 75–76. Thanks to Dr. Michelle Ladd for her insights into the “provider myth.”

    Google Scholar 

  64. Roland Marchland, Advertising the American Dream: Making Way for Modernity, 1920–1940 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), xvii.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Annegret S. Ogden, The Great American Housewife: From Helpmate to Wage Earner, 1776–1985 (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1985), 158.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Stephanie Coontz, A Strange Stirring: The Feminine Mystique and American Women at the Dawn of the 1960s (New York: Basic Books, 2011), 38. Coontz is paraphrasing Betty Friedan’s analysis in The Feminine Mystique (New York: Norton, 1963, 2001), 324–325.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Marjorie Gail Anderson, “‘The Happy Housewife’ Stereotype in Contemporary Business Magazine Advertisements,” M.A. thesis, Louisiana State University, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ahmed Belkaoui and Janice M. Belkaoui, “A Comparative Analysis of the Roles Portrayed by Women in Print Advertisements: 1958, 1970, 1972,” Journal of Marketing Research 13, no. 2 (1976): 168–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Scott Coltrane and Michele Adams, “Work-Family Imagery and Gender Stereotypes: Television and the Reproduction of Difference,” Journal of Vocational Behavior 50 (1997): 323–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Scott Coltrane and Melinda Messineo, “The Perpetuation of Subtle Prejudice: Race and Gender Imagery in 1990s Television Advertising,” Sex Roles 42, nos. 5–6 (2000): 363–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Alice E. Courtney and Sarah Wernick Lockeretz, “A Woman’s Place: An Analysis of Roles Portrayed by Women in Magazine Advertising, Journal of Marketing Research 1 (February 1971): 92–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Gayle Kaufman, “The Portrayal of Men’s Family Roles in Television Commercials,” Sex Roles 41, nos. 5–6 (1999): 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Carolyn Lin, “Beefcake Versus Cheesecake in the 1990s: Sexist Portrayals of Both Genders in Television Commercials,” Howard Journal of Communications 8, no. 3 (1997): 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. William O’Barr, “Representations of Masculinity and Femininity in Advertisements,” Advertising and Society Review 7, no. 2 (2006): http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/asr/v007/7.2unit07.html (accessed October 3, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Beth Hentges, Jo Ann Meier, and Robert Bartsch, “The Effects of Race, Gender, and Bias on Linking of Commercials with Perceived Stereotypes,” Current Research in Social Psychology 13, no. 6 (2007): 64–78.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Sue Lafky, Margaret Duffy, Mary Steinmaus, and Dan Berkowitz, “Looking Through Gendered Lenses: Female Stereotyping and Gender Role Expectations,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 73, no. 2 (1996): 379–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. On reader response theory, see Janet Staiger, Media Reception Studies (New York: New York University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  78. example of textual based analysis of advertising and gender stereotypes, see Daniel Delis Hill, Advertising to the American Woman 1900–1999 (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  79. See especially Jean Kilbourne, Deadly Persuasion: Why Women and Girls Must Fight the Addictive Power of Advertising (New York: Free Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Joann Lipman, “Television Ads Ring Up No Sale in Study,” Wall Street Journal. February 15, 1989, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Michael Schudson, Advertising: The Uneasy Persuasion: Its Dubious Impact on American Society (New York: Basic Books, 1986), xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Juliann Sivulka, “The Fabulous Fifties: Selling Mr. And Mrs. Consumer,” Advertising and Society Review 9, no. 4 (2008): http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/advertising_and_society_review/v009/9.4.sivulka.html (accessed October 3, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Erin Dejesus, “Mad Women,” Bust, December/January 2009, 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Dee Gill, “More than Just ‘Mad Men,’” Crain’s Chicago Business, October 6, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Bernice Kanner, “Ad Workplace Change, Via One Woman’s Eyes,” Advertising Age, March 28, 2005, 80–81.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Jennifer Scanlon, Inarticulate Longings: The Ladies Home Journal, Gender, and the Promise of Consumer Culture (New York: Routledge, 1995), 171–195.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Juliann Sivulka, Ad Women: How They Impact What We Need, Want, and Buy (Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  88. On race, see Jason Chambers, Madison Avenue and the Color Line: African Americans in the Advertising Industry (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Pres, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Andrew McMains, “Diversity Study Takes Ad Biz to Task,” adweek.com. January 9, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Marissa Miley and Ken Wheaton, “Agencies Not Only Lack Black Workers, They Pay Them Less,” Advertising Age, January 12, 2009, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Stuart Elliot, “A Lawyer’s Call for a Greater Black Presence in Agencies,” New York Times, January 9, 2009, B6.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Rena Bartos, The Moving Target: What Every Marketer Should Know About Women (New York: The Free Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Iain Ellwood and Shelia Shekar, Wonder Woman: Marketing Secrets for the Trillion Dollar Customer (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  94. Bernice Kanner, Pocketbook Power (New York: McGraw Hill, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Teresa Mastin, “Product Purchase Decision-Making Behavior and Gender Role Stereotypes: A Content Analysis of Advertisements in Essence and Ladies’ Home Journal, 1990–1999,” The Howard Journal of Communication 15 (2004): 241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. As quoted by James C. Foust and Katherine Bradshaw, “Something for the Boys: Framing Images of Women in Broadcasting Magazine in the 1950s,” Journalism History 33, no. 2 (2007): 93.

    Google Scholar 

  97. As Mary P. Ryan points out in her literary study of domesticity, The Empire of the Mother: American Writing About Domesticity 1830–1860 (New York: Haworth Press, 1982), 11–12: “Popular literature as an object of historical inquiry is important, and in some ways more complete and resonant, than raw individual experience. It records the way in which that experience was sorted out, evaluated, assigned relative importance, and given human and social meaning” The same holds true for understanding domestic norms via an analysis of advertising.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Pamela Walker Laird, “Progress in Separate Spheres: Selling Nineteenth-Century Technologies,” Knowledge and Society 10 (1996): 19.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Mandy Schutzman, The Real Thing: Performance, Hysteria, and Advertising (Hanover: Wesleyan University Press, 1999), 117.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Gail Collins, When Everything Changed: The Amazing Journey of American Women from 1960 to the Present (New York: Little, Brown, and Company, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  101. Ruth Rosen, The World Split Open (New York: Penguin Books, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Kenneth Allan and Scott Coltrane, “Gender Displaying Television Commercials: A Comparative Study of Television Commercials in the 1950s and 1980s,” Sex Roles 35, nos. 3–4 (1996): 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Adreinne Ward Fawcett, “Friedan Sees Real Progress in Women’s Ads,” Advertising Age, October 4, 1993, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Eileen Prescott, “Real Men Do Wear Aprons,” Across the Board, November 1983, 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Kenneth C. Schneider and Sharon Barich Schneider, “Trends in Sex Roles in Television Commercials,” Journal of Marketing 43 (1979): 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Barbara Bryant, “Combined Career-Homemaker Lifestyle Grows Ever More Popular Among Women,” Marketing News, January 18, 1977, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Karen Gentleman, “Not All Women Watch TV Soaps or Work as High-Powered Execs,” Marketing News. September 5, 1980s, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Marybeth Laruea, “Consumer: Women Torn Between Two Stereotypes,” Madison Avenue, August 1983, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  109. William J. Lundstrom and Donald Sciglimpaglia, “Sex Role Portrayals in Advertising,” Journal of Marketing 41, no. 3 (July 1977): 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Patricia D. Mamay and Richard L. Simpson, “Three Female Roles in Television Commercials,” Sex Roles 7, no. 1 (1981): 1224–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Louis C. Wagner and Janis B. Banos, “A Woman’s Place: A Follow-Up Analysis of the Roles Portrayed by Women in Magazine Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing Research 10, no. 2 (May 1973): 213–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Bryan K. Robinson and Erica Hunter, “Is Mom Still Doing It All? Reexamining Depictions of Family Work in Popular Advertising,” Journal of Family Issues 29 (2008), 482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Maria Bailey, Mom 3–0: Marketing to Today’s Mothers (Deadwood: Wyatt-McKenzie Publishing, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Becky Ebenkamp, “The Post-Soccer Mom,” Brandweek, June 23, 2008, 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Emily Foshee, “Navigating the Mommy Blogosphere: Reach the World’s Largest Target Market,” Public Relations Tactics, May 2010, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Nora Lee, The Mom Factor: What Really Drives Where We Shop, Eat, and Play (Washington: Urban Land Institute, 2005); “Marketing to Moms,” Adweek, September 28, 2009, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Judith Warner, Perfect Madness: Motherhood in the Age of Anxiety (New York: Riverhead Books, 2005), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Susan J. Douglas and Meredith W. Michaels, The Mommy Myth: The Idealization of Motherhood and How It Has Undermined Women (New York: Free Press, 2004), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Ibid., 20–21. See also Ben Yoganda, “My Heart Belongs to Mother,” New York Times, May 14, 2006, C14.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Robert Bartsch, “Gender Representations in Television Commercials: Updating an Update,” Sex Roles 43, nos. 9–10 (2000): 735–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, “Images of Women in Online Advertisements of Global Products: Does Sexism Exist?” Journal of Business Ethics 83 (2008): 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Edumund Andrews, “Survey Confirms It: Women Outjuggle Men,” New York Times, September 15, 2004: A23.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Gabriella Boston, “Sour Economy Adds to Moms’ Tasks,” The Washington Times, January 28, 2009, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jan/28/woe-is-mom (accessed October 3, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  124. Marilyn Gardner, “The Artful Dodge of Housework: More Men Pitch in to Help Around the House These Days; But Women Still Do More,” Christian Science Monitor, July 6, 2005, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Constance Gager, Laura Sanchez, and Alred Emaris, “Whose Time Is It? The Effect of Employment and Work/Family Stress on Children’s Housework,” The Journal of Family Issues, no. 30, no. 11 (2009): 1459–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Sharon Jayson, “Married Women, Unite! Husbands Do Far Less Housework; So Says Study of 28 Countries,” USA Today, August 29, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Amy Joyce, “Household Chores Conform to Stereotypes: In the Work-Family Balance Act, Women Still Do Most of the Juggling,” Washington Post, September 19, 2004, F5; “Married Women Do Twice as Much Housework as Their Husbands Do,” Marketing to Women, March 2002, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Andrew Singleton and Janemaree Mahar, “The ‘New Man’ Is in the House: Young Men, Social Change, and Housework,” The Journal of Men’s Studies 12, no. 3 (2004): 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Lisa Gidding, “Political Economy and the Construction of Gender: The Example of Housework Within Same-Sex Households,” Feminist Economics 4, no. 2 (1998): 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Diana Khor, “‘Doing Gender:’ A Critical Review and an Exploration of Lesbigay Domestic Arrangements,” Journal of GLBT Family Studies 3, no. 1 (2007): 35–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Mignon Moore, “Gendered Power Relations Among Women: A Study of Household Decision Making in Black, Lesbian Stepfamilies,” American Sociological Review 73, no. 2 (2008): 335–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Kristin Natlie, “‘I’m Not His Wife: Doing Gender and Doing Housework in the Absence of Women,” Journal of Sociology 39, no. 2 (2003): 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Sarah Oerton, “Reclaiming the ‘Housewife?’ Lesbians and Household Work,” in Gillian A. Dunne, ed., Living “Difference:” Lesbian Perspectives on Work and Family Life (New York: Haworth Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Carla A. Pfeifer, “‘Women’s Work?’ Women Partners of Transgender Men Doing Housework and Emotion Work,” Journal of Marriage and Family 72, no. 1 (2010): 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Suzanne Bianchi, “Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor,” Social Forces 70, no. 1 (2000): 191–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Sharon Claffey and Kristin Mickelson, “Division of Household Labor and Distress: The Role of Perceived Fairness for Employed Mothers,” Sex Roles 60, no. 11/13 (2009): 819–831; “Few Couples Argue Over Housework,” Marketing to Women. April 2006, 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Maggie Jackson, “Division of Labor: Gender Gap in Housework Narrows, But Remains,” Boston Globe, November 7, 2004, G1.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Ruth Davis Konigsberg, “Chore Wars,” Time, August 8, 2011, 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Sue Shellengbarger, “Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: Men Do More Housework Than Women Think,” Wall Street Journal, May 19, 2005, D1.

    Google Scholar 

  140. On how individual experiences of housework, see Sarah Pink, Home Truths: Gender, Domestic Objects and Everyday Life (New York: Berg, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  141. Nancy Rollins Ahlander and Kathleen Salugh Bahr, “Beyond Drudgery, Power, and Equity: Toward an Expanded Discourse on the Moral Dimensions of Housework in Families,” Journal of Marriage and the Family 57, no. 1 (1995): 54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Glenna Spitze and Karyn A. Losocco, “The Labor of Sisyphus? Women’s and Men’s Reactions to Housework,” Social Science Quarterly 81, no. 4 (2000): 1087–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Anne-Rigt Poortman and Tanja Van Der Lippe, “Attitudes Toward Housework and Child Care and the Gendered Division of Labor,” Journal of Marriage and Family 71, no. 3 (2009): 526–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Caitlin Flanagan, To Hell with All That: Loving and Loathing Our Inner Housewife (Boston: Back Bay Books, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  145. Shannon Hayes, Radical Homemakers: Reclaiming Domesticity from a Consumer Culture (Richmondville: Left to Write Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  146. Darla Shine, Happy Housewives: I Was a Whining, Miserable, Desperate Housewife—But I Finally Snapped Out of It. … You Can Too! (New York: Avon Books, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  147. Jean Zimmerman, Made from Scratch: Reclaiming the Pleasures of the American Hearth (New York: Free Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Jessamyn Neuhaus

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neuhaus, J. (2011). Introduction. In: Housework and Housewives in Modern American Advertising. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230337978_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230337978_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29618-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-33797-8

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics